Unraveling the Li Penetration Mechanism in Polycrystalline Solid Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Lithium dendrite penetration has been widely evidenced in ceramic solid electrolytes (SEs), which are expected to suppress Li dendrite formation due to their ultrahigh elastic modulus. This work aims to reveal the mechanism of Li penetration in polycrystalline SEs through electro‐chemo‐mechanical phase‐field model, using Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) as the model material. The results show the Li penetration patterns are influenced by both mechanical and electronic properties of the microstructures, i.e., grain boundaries (GBs). Li nucleates at the GB junctions on the Li/SE interface and propagates along the GB, at which the interfacial compressive stress is small due to the GB softening. Moreover, the excess trapped electrons at the GB may trigger isolated Li nucleation sites, abruptly increasing the Li penetration depth. High‐throughput simulations yield a phase map of Li penetration patterns under different trapped electrons concentrations and GB/grain elastic modulus mismatch. The map can quantitatively inform whether the mechanical or electronic properties dominate Li penetration morphologies, providing a strategy for the design of improved SE materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan‐Dearborn Dearborn MI 48128‐1491 USA
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body Hunan University Changsha 410082 P. R. China
Research and Innovation Center Ford Motor Company Dearborn MI 48121 USA
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.022 ↗
2. 10.1038/451652a10.1038/451652a ↗
3. 10.1149/1.222084910.1149/1.2220849 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.185085410.1149/1.1850854 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20170265710.1002/aenm.201702657 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10454510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104545 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.01510.1016/j.matt.2020.03.015 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.018 ↗
9. 10.1088/1361-6528/aab06210.1088/1361-6528/aab062 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.02.00810.1016/j.matt.2020.02.008 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20170053010.1002/aenm.201700530 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0266810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02668 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20170100310.1002/aenm.201701003 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0254210.1021/acsenergylett.8b02542 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22718610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227186 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.00910.1016/j.joule.2020.10.009 ↗
17. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9b0810.1149/1945-7111/ab9b08 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.0321910jes10.1149/2.0321910jes ↗
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ecd10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ecd ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b1722310.1021/acsami.8b17223 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0196710.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01967 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.09810.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.098 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20190067110.1002/aenm.201900671 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41586-020-1972-y10.1038/s41586-020-1972-y ↗
26. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2019.10001210.1016/j.xcrp.2019.100012 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0911409jes10.1149/2.0911409jes ↗
28. 10.1142/237310.1142/2373 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.1111904jes10.1149/2.1111904jes ↗
30. 10.1039/C7CP03304D10.1039/C7CP03304D ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.08510.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.085 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20190095010.1002/adfm.201900950 ↗
33. 10.1149/2.0221902jes10.1149/2.0221902jes ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0069310.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00693 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10010610.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100106 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10030110.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100301 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.053 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2020.10007510.1016/j.mtnano.2020.100075 ↗