journal article·2012-02Open access

Molecular Understanding of the Open‐Circuit Voltage of Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells

Shunsuke Yamamoto, Akiko Orimo, Hideo Ohkita, Hiroaki Benten, Shinzaburo Ito

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract The origin of open‐circuit voltage (VOC) was studied for polymer solar cells based on a blend of poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and seven fullerene derivatives with different LUMO energy levels and side chains. The temperature dependence of J–V characteristics was analyzed by an equivalent circuit model. As a result, VOC increased with the decrease in the saturation current density J0 of the device. Furthermore, J0 was dependent on the activation energy EA for J0, which is related to the HOMO–LUMO energy gap between P3HT and fullerene. Interestingly, the pre‐exponential term J00 for J0 was larger for pristine fullerenes than for substituted fullerene derivatives, suggesting that the electronic coupling between molecules also has substantial impact on VOC. This is probably because the recombination is non‐diffusion‐lmilited reaction depending on electron transfer at the P3HT/fullerene interface. In summary, the origin of VOC is ascribed not only to the relative HOMO–LUMO energy gap but also to the electronic couplings between fullerene/fullerene and polymer/fullerene.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.108810.1002/pip.1088 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.332.6027.29310.1126/science.332.6027.293 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20035164710.1002/anie.200351647 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.01.01510.1016/j.solmat.2007.01.015 ↗
5. 10.1080/15583724.2010.51576510.1080/15583724.2010.515765 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat192810.1038/nmat1928 ↗
7. 10.1021/am800229p10.1021/am800229p ↗
8. 10.1039/c0cc01787f10.1039/c0cc01787f ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20110009410.1002/aenm.201100094 ↗
10. 10.1021/jp201742v10.1021/jp201742v ↗
11. 10.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::AID-ADFM374>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::AID-ADFM374>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20050171710.1002/adma.200501717 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20090009010.1002/adfm.200900090 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20080005610.1002/adfm.200800056 ↗
15. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.19210.1038/nphoton.2009.192 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20099019010.1002/adma.200990190 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.188924010.1063/1.1889240 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.24520710.1103/PhysRevB.82.245207 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.11320110.1103/PhysRevB.78.113201 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20100236010.1002/adma.201002360 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja900772210.1021/ja9007722 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.359567910.1063/1.3595679 ↗
24. 10.1021/ar900139v10.1021/ar900139v ↗
25. 10.1021/ja903100p10.1021/ja903100p ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat254810.1038/nmat2548 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.81.125204 ↗
28. 10.1109/JRPROC.1957.27852810.1109/JRPROC.1957.278528 ↗
29. Sze S. M. · 1981
30. 10.1063/1.219893010.1063/1.2198930 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.340911610.1063/1.3409116 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.11520910.1103/PhysRevB.83.115209 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20070243810.1002/adma.200702438 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20090045910.1002/adfm.200900459 ↗
35. 10.1021/cm052783z10.1021/cm052783z ↗
36. 10.1063/1.239700310.1063/1.2397003 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja908602j10.1021/ja908602j ↗
38. 10.1063/1.219997010.1063/1.2199970 ↗
39. 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.204203410.1109/JSTQE.2010.2042034 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.1995007060810.1002/adma.19950070608 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.329429010.1063/1.3294290 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20110051410.1002/adfm.201100514 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja910878710.1021/ja9108787 ↗
44. 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.204306110.1109/JSTQE.2010.2043061 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.10.01410.1016/j.orgel.2010.10.014 ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20040033710.1002/adfm.200400337 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20060006810.1002/adma.200600068 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20080014510.1002/adfm.200800145 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.217042410.1063/1.2170424 ↗
50. In Ref 49 it has been proposed that the recombination rate in bulk heterojunction devices is limited by the slowest mobility in the blend and demonstrated thatVOCcan be well explained byγmin=qmin(μe μh)/ϵ. As shown in Table 1 μhof P3HT is as low as ∼10−4cm2V−1s−1in P3HT:fullerene blend films. This is much smaller thanμeof pristine fullerenes and fullerene derivatives with attached groups. In other words the recombination rate in P3HT:fullerene blend films is given byγmin=qμh/ϵ which is independent of fullerene derivatives and hence cannot explain the difference inJ00at all. In either case the difference inJ00by two orders of magnitude cannot be explained only in terms of the charge mobility.
51. 10.1021/ja100302p10.1021/ja100302p ↗
52. 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00431-610.1016/S0009-2614(01)00431-6 ↗
53. 10.1021/ja105260d10.1021/ja105260d ↗
54. 10.1021/ja201837e10.1021/ja201837e ↗
55. 10.1021/nl903828910.1021/nl9038289 ↗
56. 10.1002/anie.19931111310.1002/anie.199311113 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.20.163110.1103/PhysRevB.20.1631 ↗
58. 10.1021/jp049584810.1021/jp0495848 ↗
59. If the recombination rate is limited by the slowest mobility in the blend the difference inJ00should be due tokrecalone becauseγis independent of the presence or absence of attached groups to fullerenes. In this case HAB2between P3HT and pristine fullerenes is about 100 times larger than that between P3HT and fullerene derivatives with attached groups.
60. 10.1021/ja039924n10.1021/ja039924n ↗
61. 10.1063/1.320239310.1063/1.3202393 ↗
62. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6910.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
63. 10.1021/jp109130y10.1021/jp109130y ↗
64. 10.1016/S1010-6030(98)00217-210.1016/S1010-6030(98)00217-2 ↗
65. 10.1021/ar980112j10.1021/ar980112j ↗
66. 10.1021/nl070709510.1021/nl0707095 ↗
67. 10.1246/bcsj.43.269010.1246/bcsj.43.2690 ↗
68. 10.1080/1542140060080371310.1080/15421400600803713 ↗