journal article·2023-01-01

Effect of Test Parameters on Sensitivity of Tensile Test Results for Greige Cotton Hydroentangled Nonwoven Fabric

Weijie Yu, Lihua Lou, Michael Reynolds, Paul Sawhney, Seshadri Ramkumar

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 10· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This research is an in-depth study into the tensile properties of hydro-entangled nonwoven fabrics made of greige cotton. The effect of five different testing parameters or sample characteristics, weight, gauge length, speed of testing, angle to machine direction, and specimen width, of hydro-entangled nonwoven fabrics made of greige cotton were correlated with load at break, extension at break, tensile stress at break, tensile strain at break, Young’s modulus, and energy at break. The regression equations with an average r 2 of 0.82 demonstrated parameters’ positive and effective influence on tensile properties. The influence order of all testing parameters is gauge length = specimen width > speed. This analysis aims to study the effects of testing parameters or sample characteristics on tensile properties. It is hoped that this study can contribute a better understanding of the relationship between hydro-entangled nonwoven fabric mechanical performance and web formations, potentially promoting greige cotton applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nonwoven and Advanced Materials Laboratory, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, New Orleans, LA, USA

Funding

National Agricultural Statistics Service

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Gordon S · 2006
2. 10.1201/978142004588810.1201/9781420045888 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.09610.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.096 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.02.00310.1016/j.dyepig.2004.02.003 ↗
5. 10.1590/S1516-8913201000050000210.1590/S1516-89132010000500002 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051751140212910.1177/0040517511402129 ↗
7. Parikh DV · J Eng Fibers and Fabr · 2007 · 2 · 40
8. 10.1177/004051751036319410.1177/0040517510363194 ↗
9. Chellamani K · J Acad Indus Res · 2013 · 1 · 735
10. 10.1177/152808370706950910.1177/1528083707069509 ↗
11. Sawhney P · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2012 · 7 · 103
12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.09610.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.096 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.00710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.007 ↗
14. 10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y ↗
15. 10.1214/aoms/117770704710.1214/aoms/1177707047 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.minpro.2005.01.00210.1016/j.minpro.2005.01.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.4715910.1002/app.47159 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.4921310.1002/app.49213 ↗