Revealing the microscopic origin of the magnetization plateau in Na3Ni2BiO6
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recent experimental studies of the spin-1 honeycomb antiferromagnet Na 3 Ni 2 BiO 6 have revealed a pronounced one-third magnetization plateau under applied magnetic fields, highlighting the presence of strong magnetic frustration and anisotropy in this material. Such behavior has been attributed to substantial bond-dependent Kitaev interactions in combination with single-ion anisotropy, placing Na 3 Ni 2 BiO 6 among honeycomb compounds of interest for unconventional magnetic phases. Motivated by these observations, we present a first-principles-based analysis of the magnetic interactions in Na 3 Ni 2 BiO 6 . By combining density-functional calculations with microscopic modeling, we extract the relevant exchange parameters and construct an effective spin model that qualitatively reproduces both the elastic neutron-scattering spectra and the magnetization curve. The model captures the experimentally observed zero-field zigzag magnetic order, and proposes a double-zigzag state at intermediate magnetic fields, realizing the one-third magnetization plateau in a simpler way than suggested in previous works. Crucially, we show that the one-third magnetization plateau does not require Kitaev interactions; instead, it arises from the interplay of strong out-of-plane single-ion anisotropy and competing ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor ( J 1 ) and antiferromagnetic third-neighbor ( J 3 ) Heisenberg couplings. These results establish a consistent microscopic description of Na 3 Ni 2 BiO 6 and clarify the origin of its field-induced plateau phase from first principles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Balents, L. Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464, 199–208 (2010).10.1038/nature08917 ↗
2. Savary, L. & Balents, L. Quantum spin liquids: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016).10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502 ↗
3. Rousochatzakis, I., Perkins, N. B., Luo, Q. & Kee, H.-Y. Beyond Kitaev physics in strong spin-orbit coupled magnets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 026502 (2024).10.1088/1361-6633/ad208d ↗
4. Broholm, C. et al. Quantum spin liquids. Science 367, eaay0668 (2020).10.1126/science.aay0668 ↗
5. Wen, J., Yu, S.-L., Li, S., Yu, W. & Li, J.-X. Experimental identification of quantum spin liquids. npj Quantum Mater. 4, 12 (2019).10.1038/s41535-019-0151-6 ↗
6. Starykh, O. A. Unusual ordered phases of highly frustrated magnets: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 052502 (2015).10.1088/0034-4885/78/5/052502 ↗
7. Fernandes, R. M., Chubukov, A. V. & Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97–104 (2014).10.1038/nphys2877 ↗
8. Glasbrenner, J. K. et al. Effect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductivity in iron chalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 11, 953–958 (2015).10.1038/nphys3434 ↗
9. Scherer, D. D. et al. Interplay of nematic and magnetic orders in FeSe under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094504 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094504 ↗
10. Fortune, N. A. et al. Cascade of magnetic-field-induced quantum phase transitions in a spin- 1\2 triangular-lattice antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 257201 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.257201 ↗
11. Zhou, H. D. et al. Successive phase transitions and extended spin-excitation continuum in the s = 1\2 triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267206 (2012).
12. Susuki, T. et al. Magnetization process and collective excitations in the s=1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 267201 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.267201 ↗
13. Kamiya, Y. et al. The nature of spin excitations in the one-third magnetization plateau phase of Ba3CoSb2O9. Nat. Commun. 9, 2666 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-04914-1 ↗
14. Zhitomirsky, M. E. Field-induced transitions in a kagomé antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057204 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.057204 ↗
15. Damle, K. & Senthil, T. Spin nematics and magnetization plateau transition in anisotropic kagome magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 067202 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067202 ↗
16. Nishimoto, S., Shibata, N. & Hotta, C. Controlling frustrated liquids and solids with an applied field in a kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 4, 2287 (2013).10.1038/ncomms3287 ↗
17. Yoshida, H. K. Frustrated kagome antiferromagnets under high magnetic fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 101003 (2022).10.7566/JPSJ.91.101003 ↗
18. Heidrich-Meisner, F., Honecker, A. & Vekua, T. Frustrated ferromagnetic spin- 1\2 chain in a magnetic field: the phase diagram and thermodynamic properties. Phys. Rev. B 74, 020403(R) (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.020403 ↗
19. Jeschke, H. et al. Multistep approach to microscopic models for frustrated quantum magnets: The case of the natural mineral azurite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 217201 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217201 ↗
20. Heinze, L. et al. Magnetization process of atacamite: A case of weakly coupled s = 1/2 sawtooth chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 207201 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.207201 ↗
21. Singh, Y. & Gegenwart, P. Antiferromagnetic Mott insulating state in single crystals of the honeycomb lattice material Na2IrO3. Phys. Rev. B 82, 064412 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.064412 ↗
22. Plumb, K. W. et al. α-RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112(R) (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041112 ↗
23. Winter, S. M. et al. Models and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 493002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5 ↗
24. Trebst, S. & Hickey, C. Kitaev materials. Phys. Rep. 950, 1–37 (2022).10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.003 ↗
25. Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2 – 111 (2006).10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 ↗
26. Rau, J. G., Lee, E. K.-H. & Kee, H.-Y. Generic spin model for the honeycomb iridates beyond the Kitaev limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204 ↗
27. Winter, S. M., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O. & Valentí, R. Challenges in design of Kitaev materials: magnetic interactions from competing energy scales. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214431 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431 ↗
28. Yadav, R. et al. Kitaev exchange and field-induced quantum spin-liquid states in honeycomb α-RuCl3. Sci. Rep. 6, 37925 (2016).10.1038/srep37925 ↗
29. Kim, H.-S. & Kee, H.-Y. Crystal structure and magnetism in α-RuCl3: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155143 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155143 ↗
30. Möller, M. et al. Rethinking α-RuCl3: parameters, models, and phase diagram. Phys. Rev. B 112, 104403 (2025).10.1103/hflp-41lj ↗
31. Winter, S. M., Riedl, K., Kaib, D., Coldea, R. & Valentí, R. Probing α-RuCl3 beyond magnetic order: effects of temperature and magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 077203 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.077203 ↗
32. Hickey, C. & Trebst, S. Emergence of a field-driven u(1) spin liquid in the Kitaev honeycomb model. Nat. Commun. 10, 530 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-08459-9 ↗
33. Kaib, D. A. S., Winter, S. M. & Valentí, R. Kitaev honeycomb models in magnetic fields: dynamical response and dual models. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144445 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144445 ↗
34. Ponomaryov, A. N. et al. Nature of magnetic excitations in the high-field phase of α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 037202 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.037202 ↗
35. Sahasrabudhe, A. et al. High-field quantum disordered state in α-RuCl3: Spin flips, bound states, and multiparticle continuum. Phys. Rev. B 101, 140410(R) (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.140410 ↗
36. Sarkis, C. L. et al. Intermediate field spin(on) dynamics in α-RuCl3. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16850 (2026).
37. Park, M. J., Lee, S. & Kim, Y. B. Hinge magnons from noncollinear magnetic order in a honeycomb antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 104, L060401 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L060401 ↗
38. Feng, S. & Trivedi, N. Magnetic field induced phenomena in Kitaev spin liquids. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14496 (2026).
39. Shangguan, Y. et al. A one-third magnetization plateau phase as evidence for the Kitaev interaction in a honeycomb-lattice antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 19, 1883–1889 (2023).10.1038/s41567-023-02212-2 ↗
40. Shi, X. et al. Low-energy spin dynamics in a Kitaev material Na3Ni2BiO6 investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance. Chin. Phys. B 33, 067601 (2024).10.1088/1674-1056/ad3dce ↗
41. Chen, Z. et al. Strength of Kitaev interaction in Na3Co2SbO6 and Na3Ni2BiO6. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69, 257513 (2026).10.1007/s11433-025-2743-4 ↗
42. Riedl, K., Li, Y., Valentí, R. & Winter, S. M. Ab initio approaches for low-energy spin Hamiltonians. Phys. Status Solidi B 256, 1800684 (2019).10.1002/pssb.201800684 ↗
43. Kaib, D. A. S. et al. Electronic and magnetic properties of the RuX3 (X=Cl, Br, I) family: two siblings—and a cousin? npj Quantum Mater. 7, 75 (2022).10.1038/s41535-022-00481-3 ↗
44. Konieczna, A. A., Kaib, D. A. S., Winter, S. M. & Valentí, R. Understanding the microscopic origin of the magnetic interactions in CoNb2O6. npj Quantum Mater. 10, 8 (2025).10.1038/s41535-024-00715-6 ↗
45. Stavropoulos, P. P. Emergent Phenomena in Correlated Materials with Strong Spin-orbit Coupling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto (Canada) (2021).
46. Dahlbom, D. et al. Sunny.jl: A Julia package for spin dynamics. J. Open Source Softw. 10, 8138 (2025).10.21105/joss.08138 ↗
47. Woodland, L. et al. Excitations of quantum Ising chain CoNb2O6 in low transverse field: quantitative description of bound states stabilized by off-diagonal exchange and applied field. Phys. Rev. B 108, 184417 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.184417 ↗
48. Churchill, D. & Kee, H.-Y. Transforming from Kitaev to disguised Ising chain: application to CoNb2O6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056703 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.056703 ↗
49. Seibel, E. M. et al. Structure and magnetic properties of the α-NaFeO2-type honeycomb compound Na3Ni2BiO6. Inorg. Chem. 52, 13605–13611 (2013).10.1021/ic402131e ↗
50. Liu, J. et al. Quantification of honeycomb number-type stacking faults: application to Na3Ni2BiO6 cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Inorg. Chem. 55, 8478–8492 (2016).10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01078 ↗
51. Xiao, L. et al. Insight into the structural disorder in honeycomb-ordered sodium-layered oxide cathodes. iScience 23, 100898 (2020).10.1016/j.isci.2020.100898 ↗
52. Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743–1757 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743 ↗
53. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. Eschrig, H., Koepernik, K. & Chaplygin, I. Density functional application to strongly correlated electron systems. J. Solid State Chem. 176, 482–495 (2003).10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00274-3 ↗
55. Koepernik, K., Janson, O., Sun, Y. & van den Brink, J. Symmetry-conserving maximally projected wannier functions. Phys. Rev. B 107, 235135 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235135 ↗
56. Autieri, C. et al. Limited ferromagnetic interactions in monolayers of MPS3 (M = Mn and Ni). J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 6791–6802 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00646 ↗
57. Pavarini, E., Koch, E., Lichtenstein, A. & Vollhardt, D. (eds) The LDA+DMFT Approach to Strongly Correlated Materials, vol. 1 of Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Modeling and Simulation (Forschungszenrum Jülich, Jülich, 2011). https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/17645.
58. Zvereva, E. A. et al. Zigzag antiferromagnetic quantum ground state in monoclinic honeycomb lattice antimonates A3Ni2SbO6 (A=Li,Na). Phys. Rev. B 92, 144401 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.144401 ↗
59. Hernandez, V., Roman, J. E. & Vidal, V. SLEPc: A scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31, 351–362 (2005).10.1145/1089014.1089019 ↗
60. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).10.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗