journal article·2026-08-05

Correlations Between Lattice Vacancies and Ferromagnetism in Mn‐Doped ZnO Nanorods

Mutsuhiro Shima, Kazuya Sugio, Tanawat Imboon, Keisuke Yamada, Sirikanjana Thongmee

physica status solidi (a)· Volume 223· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

We have investigated the effects of Mn doping and lattice vacancies on the structure and magnetic properties of chemically synthesized ZnO nanorods for d 0 ferromagnetism. Energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy analysis confirms that Mn composition X in ZnO nanorods with 80–198 nm in diameter and 0.477–2.10 μm in length increases from 0.29% to 4.1% with increasing the initial doping level of Mn from 5% to 30% in the synthesis. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis shows that the oxygen vacancy concentration V O in the crystal increases with increasing the synthesis temperature T syn from 333 to 353 K. On the other hand, photoluminescence measurements suggest that the zinc vacancy concentration V Zn increases with X . Furthermore, magnetic measurements reveal that all the samples exhibit ferromagnetic hysteresis at 1.8 and 300 K, where the saturation magnetization M S varies with V O , suggesting that the oxygen vacancies play an important role in the observed ferromagnetism. In addition, it is revealed that in Mn‐doped ZnO nanorods, M S increases with increasing both V O and X . This is presumably due to an increase in magnetic moments originating from paired defects at oxygen and zinc lattice sites V O – V Zn, in addition to the moment from Mn 2+ .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science Gifu University Gifu Japan

Department of Physics Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1369‐7021(06)71691‐110.1016/S1369‐7021(06)71691‐1 ↗
2. 10.1021/la902142b10.1021/la902142b ↗
3. 10.5923/j.nn.20130303.0610.5923/j.nn.20130303.06 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2025.11576710.1016/j.rser.2025.115767 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598‐020‐59326‐310.1038/s41598‐020‐59326‐3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.23810.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.238 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano1509068210.3390/nano15090682 ↗
8. 10.1039/d1na00880c10.1039/d1na00880c ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ipha.2024.08.00410.1016/j.ipha.2024.08.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.00210.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12466110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124661 ↗
12. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1511263410.3390/pharmaceutics15112634 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0203510.1021/acsanm.3c02035 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bbadva.2022.10005110.1016/j.bbadva.2022.100051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mser.2009.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2009.02.001 ↗
16. 10.2472/JSMS.59.69010.2472/JSMS.59.690 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.02510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.05.00210.1016/j.materresbull.2018.05.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.11.01210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.11.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15974110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159741 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.03010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.030 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41598‐025‐90425‐110.1038/s41598‐025‐90425‐1 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10854‐025‐15741‐810.1007/s10854‐025‐15741‐8 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c0256910.1021/acs.jpcc.5c02569 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.01.02610.1016/j.jmmm.2013.01.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.00810.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.008 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.155612510.1063/1.1556125 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cjph.2019.09.03710.1016/j.cjph.2019.09.037 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598‐023‐35456‐210.1038/s41598‐023‐35456‐2 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.360996410.1063/1.3609964 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.506395310.1063/1.5063953 ↗
32. 10.1038/nmat131010.1038/nmat1310 ↗
33. 10.1088/0256‐307X/22/4/05910.1088/0256‐307X/22/4/059 ↗
34. 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2012.01.04310.1016/J.JALLCOM.2012.01.043 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.13927710.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.139277 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598‐023‐44102‐w10.1038/s41598‐023‐44102‐w ↗
37. 10.1007/s10854‐026‐17202‐210.1007/s10854‐026‐17202‐2 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467‐026‐70835‐z10.1038/s41467‐026‐70835‐z ↗