Pareto–Edgeworth–Grierson (PEG), Preference Selection Index (PSI) and CURLI method in multi criteria decision making for turning process parameters optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT In almost all machining processes there are several constraints associated and the objective functions are in conflict with the another objective function. In these situations, where equal importance is to be given to all constraints, multi criteria decision making is involved to determine the best optimal solution taking into consideration of all the objective functions in the turning process of AISI4140 steel. In this paper, PEG, PSI and CURLI method are employed. The PEG provides effective discrimination among the alternatives and ranking of alternatives is done effectively without any transition. PSI method is used in identifying the suitable alternatives without assigning the subjective weight assignment. In CURLI method, pairwise scoring matrix is obtained by computing the pairwise absolute difference between the values of the each alternative. Gini index is used in this work to quantify the level of disagreement among the PEG, PSI and CURLI ranking results for each alternative. In this work, PEG and CURLI approaches for MCDM for turning process parameters for AISI 4140 steel, the experimental run ‘#A14’ achieved the highest utility value and minimum radial deviation from the ideal solution, resulting combined acceptance of superior productivity in achieving minimum surface roughness and maximum MRR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KGISL Institute of Technology, India
Adithya Institute of Technology, India
Mahendra Institute of Technology, India
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. “Multi-criteria decision making of turning operation based on PEG, PSI and CURLI methods”10.1051/mfreview/2022007 ↗
2. “Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index.”10.1504/IJOR.2016.078462 ↗
3. Application of MCDM methods for process parameter optimization in turning process—a review
4. “Application of MCDM method for the selection of optimum process parameters in turning process”
5. “Application of MCDM-based TOPSIS method for the selection of optimal process parameter in turning of pure titanium”10.1108/BIJ-01-2016-0004 ↗
6. “Application of MCDM based hybrid optimization tool during turning of ASTM A588.”10.5267/j.dsl.2017.6.003 ↗
7. “An MCDM approach for multi-response optimisation of machining parameters in turning of EN8 steel (AISI-1040) for sustainable manufacturing.”10.1007/s12008-023-01368-8 ↗
8. “The improved CURLI method for multi-criteria decision making”10.48084/etasr.5538 ↗
9. “CURLIA: A streamlined aggregation method that elevates ranking accuracy in complex MCDM problems”10.2298/YJOR250815040T ↗
10. “Comparision of both methods psi and curli: applied in solving multi-objective optimization problem of turning process”
11. “Applying multi-criteria decision making methods for cutting oil selection”10.15587/1729-4061.2023.275717 ↗
12. “Dry turning optimization of austenitic stainless steel 316L based on Taguchi and TOPSIS approaches.”10.1051/mattech/2020034 ↗
13. “BILAL KURŞUNCU., CAHIT KURBANOĞLU., ŞEVKI YILMAZ GÜVEN., “Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods”10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.042 ↗
14. KAMILLA B.S. · 2022 · 135
15. “ Experimental investigation based on CDM optimization of electrical discharge machined Al-WC-B4C hybrid composite using Taguchi-MARCOS method”
16. “Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes”10.1051/mfreview/2022003 ↗
17. “A combination method for multi-criteria decision making problem in turning process”10.1051/mfreview/2021024 ↗
18. “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: a comparative study”10.14743/apem2021.4.412 ↗
19. “Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process”10.36897/jme/142599 ↗
20. “CURLIA: A streamlined aggregation method that elevates ranking accuracy in complex MCDM problems.”
21. “The performance of TiN-coated high speed steel tool inserts in turning”10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00066-3 ↗
22. “Comparison of MCDM methods effectiveness in the selection of plastic injection molding machines”10.24036/teknomekanik.v7i1.29272 ↗
23. “SIWEC-R: A rank-sensitive improvement to SIWEC methodology”10.24036/teknomekanik.v8i2.40172 ↗
24. “The Preference Selection Index (PSI) in multi-criteria decision-making: a systematic and critical review of applications, integrations, and future directions”10.3390/mca30060124 ↗