journal article·2026-07-25

Modeling Anthropogenic Pressure with Synthetic Water and Wastewater Media: Growth Response of Lemna minor Under a Controlled Chemical Gradient

Magdalena Nowak, Tomasz Kamizela, Angelika Skorupa, Małgorzata Worwąg

Materials· Volume 19· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Anthropogenic pressure on aquatic environments is currently associated not only with the inflow of nutrients, but also with the presence of municipal micropollutants and complex mixtures of sewage origin. This study aimed to evaluate the growth response of Lemna minor (L. minor) and the behavior of the plant–medium system under conditions of a controlled chemical gradient reflecting an increasing degree of anthropogenic transformation of the aquatic environment. The experimental setup included four synthetic media: two variants of river water with varying anthropogenic loads and two variants of synthetic wastewater, one of which was enriched with caffeine as a marker of municipal pressure. The experiment was conducted in two independent 14-day series, analyzing changes in nitrate and orthophosphate concentrations, pH, conductivity, plant morphological condition, and final biomass. The most favorable growth conditions for L. minor were found in the river variants, especially in the medium with higher loading, whereas the wastewater variants caused growth inhibition, deterioration in plant condition, and greater instability of physicochemical parameters. In the wastewater media, nitrate concentrations did not show a consistent net decrease, while orthophosphate concentrations remained high. These observations indicate that the measured nutrient forms were not effectively reduced under the tested conditions. However, the processes responsible for their temporal patterns could not be identified from the monitored parameters. The addition of caffeine modified the system’s response, but its effect was not quantitatively consistent across both series. The results confirm the usefulness of synthetic media for modeling anthropogenic pressure gradients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Affiliations

Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland

Funding

Czestochowa University of Technology

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: A global problem10.1065/espr2002.12.142 ↗
2. Agriculture and eutrophication: Where do we go from here?10.3390/su6095853 ↗
3. Zhang, W., Lou, I., Ung, W.K., Kong, Y., and Mok, K.M. (2022). The impact of cyanobacteria blooms on the aquatic environment and human health. Toxins, 14.10.3390/toxins14100658 ↗
4. A review on emerging water contaminants and the application of sustainable removal technologies10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100219 ↗
5. Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.059 ↗
6. Combined toxicity of therapeutic pharmaceuticals to duckweed, L. minor
7. Zhou, Y., Stepanenko, A., Kishchenko, O., Xu, J., and Borisjuk, N. (2023). Duckweeds for phytoremediation of polluted water. Plants, 12.10.3390/plants12030589 ↗
8. Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater contamination of surface waters10.1021/es020125z ↗
9. Combined sewer overflows to surface waters detected by the anthropogenic marker caffeine10.1021/es052553l ↗
10. Investigations of the presence of caffeine in the Rudawa River, Kraków, Poland10.1007/s10661-015-4760-7 ↗
11. Lim, F.Y., Ong, S.L., and Hu, J.Y. (2017). Recent advances in the use of chemical markers for tracing wastewater contamination in aquatic environment: A review. Water, 9.10.3390/w9020143 ↗
12. Quyen, D.T.T., Masahiro, O., Otaki, Y., and Chaminda, T. (2021). Sewage Markers as Determinants to Differentiate Origins of Emerging Organic Pollutants in an Urban Sri Lankan Water Drainage Network. Water, 13.10.3390/w13202898 ↗
13. Sucralose and caffeine as chemical indicators of domestic wastewater contamination in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin10.1007/s10661-024-13252-3 ↗
14. Sikorski, Ł., Bęś, A., and Warmiński, K. (2023). The effect of quinolones on common duckweed L. minor L., a hydrophyte bioindicator of environmental pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20065089 ↗
15. Ambiguous changes in photosynthetic parameters of L. minor L. after short-term exposure to naproxen and paracetamol: Can the risk be ignored?10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106537 ↗
16. Noori, A.N., Corbelli, L.C., Lincoln, E.L., Thomas, S.T., Jones, J., Nason, S.L., White, J.C., Lewis, R.L., and Haynes, C.L. (2025). Phytotoxicity and phytoremediation potential of L. minor exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid. Front. Plant Sci., 15.10.3389/fpls.2024.1493896 ↗
17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). Test No. 221: Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test, OECD Publishing.
18. Ziegler, P. (2025). Developments in toxicity testing with duckweeds. J. Xenobiot., 15.10.3390/jox15020048 ↗
19. Application of common duckweed (L. minor) in phytoremediation of chemicals in the environment: State and future perspective10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.025 ↗
20. Vulpe, C.-B., Toplicean, I.-M., Agachi, B.-V., and Datcu, A.-D. (2025). A review on uses of L. minor, a beneficial plant for sustainable water treatments, in relation to bioeconomy aspects. Water, 17.10.3390/w17091400 ↗
21. Biomonitoring of heavy metals and their phytoremediation by duckweeds: Advances and prospects10.1016/j.envres.2023.118015 ↗
22. Advantages and limitations of duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems10.2166/wst.1997.0207 ↗
23. Estimation of the potential of L. minor for effluent remediation in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture using newly developed synthetic aquaculture wastewater10.1007/s10499-021-00736-z ↗
24. Walsh, É., Coughlan, N.E., O’Brien, S., Jansen, M.A.K., and Kuehnhold, H. (2021). Density dependence influences the efficacy of wastewater remediation by L. minor. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10071366 ↗
25. Duckweed bioreactors: Challenges and opportunities for enhanced phytoremediation10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130285 ↗
26. Evaluation of L. minor phytoremediation performance for the treatment of dairy wastewater10.2166/wpt.2023.074 ↗
27. Redmond, C., Coughlan, N.E., Purcell, A., and Jansen, M.A.K. (2025). Optimisation of dairy soiled water as a novel duckweed growth medium. Plants, 14.10.3390/plants14010110 ↗
28. Iqbal, J., Javed, A., and Baig, M.A. (2019). Growth and nutrient removal efficiency of duckweed (L. minor) from synthetic and dumpsite leachate under artificial and natural conditions. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0221755 ↗
29. Wastewater valorisation in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system; assessing nutrient removal and biomass production by duckweed species10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119059 ↗
30. Duckweed application in nature-based system for water phytoremediation and high-value coproducts at family agrisystem from a circular economy perspective10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170714 ↗
31. Effects of point and nonpoint source pollution on urban rivers: From the perspective of pollutant composition and toxicity10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132441 ↗
32. Application of duckweed (Lemna sp.) and water fern (Azolla sp.) in the removal of pharmaceutical residues in water: State of art focus on antibiotics10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156565 ↗
33. (1972). Determination of the Biochemical Oxidation Efficiency of Anionic and Nonionic Synthetic Surfactants Using the Activated Sludge Method Under Kinetic Conditions (Standard No. PN-72/C-04550).
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Test No. 303: Simulation Test—Aerobic Sewage Treatment—A: Activated Sludge Units; B: Biofilms, OECD Publishing. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3.
35. European Commission (2014). Commission Regulation (EU) No. 260/2014 of 24 January 2014 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning REACH; Test Method C.10: Simulation Test—Aerobic Sewage Treatment. Off. J. Eur. Union, L81, 1–253.
36. (1999). Water Quality—Guidelines for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) (Standard No. PN-EN 1484:1999).
37. Hermanowicz, W., Dojlido, J., Dożańska, W., Koziorowski, B., and Zerbe, J. (1999). Fizyczno-Chemiczne Badanie Wody i Ścieków, Wydawnictwo Arkady. [2nd ed.]. (In Polish).
38. (2004). Charakterystyka Osadów Ściekowych—Oznaczanie Suchej Pozostałości i Zawartości Wody (Standard No. PN-EN 12880:2004).
39. Lowering pH enables duckweed (L. minor L.) growth on toxic concentrations of high-nutrient agricultural wastewater10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136392 ↗
40. Caffeine as an anthropogenic marker of domestic waste: A study from Lake Simcoe watershed10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.001 ↗
41. Devlamynck, R., de Souza, M.F., Michels, E., Sigurnjak, I., Donoso Pantoja, N.C., Coudron, C., Leenknegt, J., Vermeir, P., Eeckhout, M., and Meers, E. (2021). Agronomic and environmental performance of L. minor cultivated on agricultural wastewater streams: A practical approach. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031570 ↗