Adsorption behavior of hydrophilic carbon nanotube freestanding film with high-efficiency water purification

1. Katheresan V, Kansedo J, Lau SY (2018) Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 6:4676–4697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.06010.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 ↗

2. Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2018) Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1193–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z ↗

3. Nawaz MS, Ahsan M (2014) Comparison of physico-chemical, advanced oxidation and biological techniques for the textile wastewater treatment. Alexandria Eng J 53:717–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.00710.1016/j.aej.2014.06.007 ↗

4. Zongping Wang MX (2011) Textile dyeing wastewater treatment. Adv Treat Textile Effluent. https://doi.org/10.5772/103910.5772/1039 ↗

5. CiardelliCorsi GL, Marcucci M (2000) Membrane separation for wastewater reuse in the textile industry. Conserv Recycl 31:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00079-310.1016/S0921-3449(00)00079-3 ↗

6. Mo JH et al (2008) Treatment of dye aqueous solutions using nanofiltration polyamide composite membranes for the dye wastewater reuse. Dyes Pigments 76:429–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.09.00710.1016/j.dyepig.2006.09.007 ↗

7. Xu Y et al (1999) Treatment of textile dye plant effluent by nanofiltration membrane. Separat Sci Technol 34:2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-10010078710.1081/ss-100100787 ↗

8. Han F et al (2009) Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review. Appl Cataly A: General 359:25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.04310.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.043 ↗

9. Li Y et al (2024) A personalized electronic textile for ultrasensitive pressure sensing enabled by biocompatible MXene/PEDOT:PSS composite. Carbon Energy 6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.53010.1002/cey2.530 ↗

10. Zheng X et al (2023) Versatile electronic textile enabled by a mixed-dimensional assembly strategy. Small 19:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20220813410.1002/smll.202208134 ↗

11. Zheng X et al (2023) MXene functionalized, highly breathable and sensitive pressure sensors with multi-layered porous structure. Adv Funct Mater 33:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221488010.1002/adfm.202214880 ↗

12. Zheng X et al (2024) Skin-inspired textile electronics enable ultrasensitive pressure sensing. Small 20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20231003210.1002/smll.202310032 ↗

13. Shao Y et al (2023) Characteristics of electrical heating and sensing properties for CNTs/GNs polyester-knitted fabrics based on network Structure. Fibers Polym 24:1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00119-610.1007/s12221-023-00119-6 ↗

14. Xu W et al (2016) High-strength carbon nanotube film from improving alignment and densification. Nano Lett 16:946–952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0386310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03863 ↗

15. Roy S et al (2012) Formation of carbon nanotube bucky paper and feasibility study for filtration at the nano and molecular scale. J Phys Chem C 116:19025–19031. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp305677h10.1021/jp305677h ↗

16. Yu YL et al (2020) Ultra-black and self-cleaning all carbon nanotube hybrid films for efficient water desalination and purification. Carbon 169:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.08910.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.089 ↗

17. Li Z et al (2004) Carbon nanotube film sensors. Adv Mat 16:640–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20030631010.1002/adma.200306310 ↗

18. ShinichiNagasawaMasako Yudasaka AA et al (2000) Effect of oxidation on single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 328(6):374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.01610.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.016 ↗

19. Chen X et al (2016) Controlled thermal functionalization for dispersion enhancement of multi-wall carbon nanotube in organic solvents. J Mater Sci 51:5625–5634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9864-010.1007/s10853-016-9864-0 ↗

20. Kumanek B et al (2021) Enhancing thermoelectric properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes using halide compounds at room temperature and above. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88079-w10.1038/s41598-021-88079-w ↗

21. Srivastava A et al (2004) Carbon nanotube filters. Nature Mater 3:610–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat119210.1038/nmat1192 ↗

22. Lee CH et al (2011) The performance of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic carbon nanotube meshes in water–oil filtration. Carbon 49:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.01610.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.016 ↗

23. Guo J et al (2016) Preparation and dye filtration property of electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate–calcium alginate/carbon nanotubes composite nanofibrous filtration membrane. Separat Purif Technol 161:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.03610.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.036 ↗

24. Li HB et al (2010) Carbon nanotube sponge filters for trapping nanoparticles and dye molecules from water. Chem Commun 46:7966–7968. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc03290e10.1039/c0cc03290e ↗

25. Gui X et al (2011) Recyclable carbon nanotube sponges for oil absorption. Acta Mater 59:4798–4804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.02210.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.022 ↗

26. Lam S-M, Sin J-C, Mohamed AR (2016) A review on photocatalytic application of g-C3N4/semiconductor (CNS) nanocomposites towards the erasure of dyeing wastewater. Mater Sci Semiconduc Process 47:62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.01910.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.019 ↗

27. Luan J et al (2016) Efficient adsorption of organic dyes on a flexible single-wall carbon nanotube film. J Mater Chem A 4:1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta08627b10.1039/c5ta08627b ↗

28. Ma J et al (2012) Enhanced adsorptive removal of methyl orange and methylene blue from aqueous solution by alkali-activated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5749–5760. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301053m10.1021/am301053m ↗

29. Zhang ZJ et al (2001) Select pathways to carbon nanotube film growth. Adv Mater 13:1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200112)13:23%3c176710.1002/1521-4095(200112)13:23<1767 ↗

30. Rashid MH-O, Ralph SF (2017) Carbon nanotube membranes: synthesis, properties, and future filtration applications. Nanomaterials 7:99. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano705009910.3390/nano7050099 ↗

31. Chagovets VV et al (2012) Noncovalent interaction of methylene blue with carbon nanotubes: theoretical and mass spectrometry characterization. J Phys Chem C 116:20579–20590. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp306333c10.1021/jp306333c ↗

32. Pelalak R et al (2021) Molecular dynamics simulation of novel diamino-functionalized hollow mesosilica spheres for adsorption of dyes from synthetic wastewater. J Mol Liquids 322:114812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11481210.1016/j.molliq.2020.114812 ↗

33. Chimprasit A, Hannongbua S, Saparpakorn P (2021) Adsorption study of lac dyes with chitosan coated on silk fibroin using molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Graph Modell 106:107934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2021.10793410.1016/j.jmgm.2021.107934 ↗

34. El Hassani AA et al (2023) A combined molecular dynamics simulation, DFT calculations, and experimental study of the adsorption of Rhodamine B dye on kaolinite and hydroxyapatite in aqueous solutions. Surf Interf 36:102647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10264710.1016/j.surfin.2023.102647 ↗

35. Yu Y et al (2023) Energy saving dual-mode recycling of wastewater by MWCNTs-COOK/PDA/PVA assisted composite membrane. Chem Eng J 475:146202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14620210.1016/j.cej.2023.146202 ↗