Performance evolution of porous Cu/CuxO(x = 2,1) in the whole life cycle for methanol oxidation

1. Attar AE, Oularbi L, Chemchoub S, Rhazi ME (2020) Preparation and characterization of copper oxide particles/polypyrrole (Cu2O/PPy) via electrochemical method: application in direct ethanol fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energ 45:8887–8898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.00810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.008 ↗

2. Xu W, Zhu S, Li Z, Cui Z, Yang X (2015) Evolution of palladium/copper oxide-titanium dioxide nanostructures by dealloying and their catalytic performance for methanol electro-oxidation. J Power Sources 274:1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.14710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.147 ↗

3. Shih ZY, Wang CW, Xub G, Chang HT (2013) Porous palladium copper nanoparticles for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol in direct methanol fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 1:4773–4778. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta01664a10.1039/c3ta01664a ↗

4. Yuda A, Ashok A, Kumar A (2022) A comprehensive and critical review on recent progress in anode catalyst for methanol oxidation reaction. Catal Rev 64:126–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2020.180281110.1080/01614940.2020.1802811 ↗

5. Antolini E (2018) Photo-assisted methanol oxidation on Pt-TiO2 catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells: a short review. Appl Catal B Environ 237:491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.02910.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.029 ↗

6. Rebello JS, Samant PV, Figueiredo JL, Fernandes JB (2006) Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of carbon-supported MnOx/Ru catalysts for methanol oxidation in fuel cells. J Power Sour 153(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.00510.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.005 ↗

7. Gamil S, Rouby W, Antuch M, Zedan IT (2019) Nanohybrid layered double hydroxide materials as efficient catalysts for methanol electrooxidation. RSC Adv 9(24):13503–13514. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra01270b10.1039/c9ra01270b ↗

8. Chen L, Hua Z, Shi J, He M (2018) CuO/Co(OH)2 nanosheets: a novel kind of electrocatalyst for highly efficient electrochemical oxidation of methanol. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(45):39002–39008. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1625610.1021/acsami.8b16256 ↗

9. Zhang Z, Liu J, Gu J, Sub L, Cheng L (2014) An overview of metal oxide materials as electrocatalysts and supports for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 7:2535–2558. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43886d10.1039/c3ee43886d ↗

10. Royer S, Duprez D (2011) Catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide over transition metal oxides. ChemCatChem 3:24–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.20100037810.1002/cctc.201000378 ↗

11. Dresp S, Strasser P (2018) Non-noble metal oxides and their application as bifunctional catalyst in reversible fuel cells and rechargeable air batteries. ChemCatChem 10:4162–4171. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.20180066010.1002/cctc.201800660 ↗

12. Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang W, Chenge J, Li X, Cheng P, Chen C, Zhu Y, Zhang S (2024) Research progress of metal oxide supports for fuel cells electrocatalysts. ChemistrySelect 9:e202400479. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20240047910.1002/slct.202400479 ↗

13. Zhou Z, Li X, Li Q, Zhao Y, Pang H (2019) Copper-based materials as highly active electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Mater Today Chem 11:169–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.10.00810.1016/j.mtchem.2018.10.008 ↗

14. Ratynski M, Hamankiewicz B, Krajewski M, Boczar M, Ziolkowska D, Czerwinski A (2018) Single step, electrochemical preparation of copper-based positive electrode for lithium primary cells. Materials 11:2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1111212610.3390/ma11112126 ↗

15. Schimka L, Harl J, Stroppa A, Grüneis A, Marsman M, Mittendorfer F, Kresse G (2010) Accurate surface and adsorption energies from many-body perturbation theory. Nat Mater 9:741–744. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat280610.1038/nmat2806 ↗

16. Hori Y, Murata A, Yoshinami Y (1991) Adsorption of CO, intermediately formed in electrochemical reduction of CO2, at a copper electrode. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 87:125–128. https://doi.org/10.1039/ft991870012510.1039/ft9918700125 ↗

17. Farooq U, Ahmad T, Naaz F, Islam SU (2023) Review on metals and metal oxides in sustainable energy production: progress and perspectives. Energy Fuels 37:1577–1632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c0339610.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03396 ↗

18. Wang T, Li LY, Chen LN, Sheng T, Chen L, Wang YC, Zhang P, Hong YH, Ye J, Lin WF, Zhang Q, Zhang P, Fu G, Tian N, Sun SG, Zhou ZY (2022) High CO-tolerant Ru-based catalysts by constructing an oxide blocking layer. J Am Chem Soc 144:9292–9301. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c0060210.1021/jacs.2c00602 ↗

19. Chen H, Liang X, Liu Y, Ai X, Asefa T, Zou X (2020) Active site engineering in porous electrocatalysts. Adv Mater 32:2002435. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200243510.1002/adma.202002435 ↗

20. Li Y, Fu ZY, Su BL (2012) Hierarchically structured porous materials for energy conversion and storage. Adv Funct Mater 22:4634–4667. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120059110.1002/adfm.201200591 ↗

21. Yang Q, Qin Y, Chu S, Sun S, Liu D, Yang S, Liang S (2021) Preparation of nanoporous Cu/Cu2O composites by anodic oxidation and their electrocatalytic performance towards methanol oxidation. Mater Today Commun 26:101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10199210.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101992 ↗

22. Hu Z, Xu L, Li J, Wang Q, Shao Y, Chen X, Dai W, Ouyang M (2021) Mechanistic insight into the accelerated decay of fuel cells from catalyst-layer structural failure. Energy Convers Manag 227:113568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11356810.1016/j.enconman.2020.113568 ↗

23. Nguyen HL, Han J, Nguyen XL, Yu S, Goo Y-M, Le DD (2021) Review of the durability of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell in long-term operation: main influencing parameters and testing protocols. Energies 14:4048. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1413404810.3390/en14134048 ↗

24. Shibata T, Zhu YC (1995) The effect of film formation conditions on the structure and composition of anodic oxide films on titanium. Corros Sci 37:253–27010.1016/0010-938X(94)00133-Q ↗

25. Fu X, Wan C, Huang Y, Duan X (2022) Noble metal based electrocatalysts for alcohol oxidation reactions in alkaline media. Adv Funct Mater 32:2106401. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210640110.1002/adfm.202106401 ↗

26. Giri SD, Sarkar A (2016) Electrochemical study of bulk and monolayer copper in alkaline solution. J Electrochem Soc 163:H252–H259. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0071605jes10.1149/2.0071605jes ↗

27. Chung DY, Lee KJ, Sung YE (2016) Methanol electro-oxidation on the Pt surface: revisiting the cyclic voltammetry interpretation. J Phys Chem C 120:9028–9035. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1230310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12303 ↗

28. Hofstead-Duffy AM, Chen DJ, Sun SG, Tong YJ (2012) Origin of the current peak of negative scan in the cyclic voltammetry of methanol electro-oxidation on Pt-based electrocatalysts: a revisit to the current ratio criterion. J Mater Chem 22:5205–5208. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM15426A10.1039/C2JM15426A ↗

29. Zhao Y, Li X, Schechter JM, Yang Y (2016) Revisiting the oxidation peak in the cathodic scan of the cyclic voltammogram of alcohol oxidation on noble metal electrodes. RSC Adv 6:5384–5390. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA24249E10.1039/C5RA24249E ↗

30. Haisch T, Kubannek F, Nikitina L, Nikitin I, Pott S, Clees T, Krewer U (2020) The origin of the hysteresis in cyclic voltammetric response of alkaline methanol electrooxidation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:16648–16654. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP00976H10.1039/D0CP00976H ↗

31. Yu EH, Scott K, Reeve RW (2003) A study of the anodic oxidation of methanol on Pt in alkaline solutions. J Electroanal Chem 547:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(03)00172-410.1016/S0022-0728(03)00172-4 ↗

32. Abdel Rahim MA, Abdel Hameed RM, Khalil MW (2004) Nickel as a catalyst for the electro-oxidation of methanol in alkaline medium. J Power Sour 134:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.034 ↗

33. Marken F, Neudeck A, Bond AM (2010) Cyclic voltammetry. Electroanalytical methods: guide to experiments and applications 57–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02915-8410.1007/978-3-642-02915-84 ↗

34. Feng Y, Bi L, Liu Z, Kong D, Yu Z (2012) Significantly enhanced electrocatalytic activity for methanol electro-oxidation on Ag oxide-promoted PtAg/C catalysts in alkaline electrolyte. J Catal 290:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2012.02.01310.1016/j.jcat.2012.02.013 ↗

35. Allam NK, Grimes CA (2011) Electrochemical fabrication of complex copper oxide nanoarchitectures via copper anodization in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. Mater Lett 65:1949–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.10510.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.105 ↗

36. Lasia A (2014) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4614-8933-7 ↗

37. Mehmood A, Scibioh MA, Prabhuram J, An MG, Ha HY (2015) A review on durability issues and restoration techniques in long-term operations of direct methanol fuel cells. J Power Sour 297:224–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.09410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.094 ↗

38. Knights SD, Colbow KM, Pierre JS, Wilkinson DP (2004) Aging mechanisms and lifetime of PEFC and DMFC. J Power Sour 127:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.033 ↗

39. Shukla AK, Jackson CL, Scott K, Raman RK (2002) An improved-performance liquid-feed solid-polymer-electrolyte direct methanol fuel cell operating at near-ambient conditions. Electrochim Acta 47:3401–3407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00276-110.1016/S0013-4686(02)00276-1 ↗

40. Eickes C, Piela P, Davey J, Zelenay P (2005) Recoverable cathode performance loss in direct methanol fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 153:A171–A178. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.213607310.1149/1.2136073 ↗

41. Kim H, Shin SJ, Park Y, Song J, Kim H (2006) Determination of DMFC deterioration during long-term operation. J Power Sour 160:440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.05710.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.057 ↗

42. Helia H, Jafariana M, Mahjania MG, Gobalb F (2004) Electro-oxidation of methanol on copper in alkaline solution. Electrochim Acta 49:4999–5006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.06.01510.1016/j.electacta.2004.06.015 ↗