Effect of the combination of chain extender/coupling agents on the mechanical performance and compost ability of PLA/PBAT polymer nanocomposites: simulation and experiment

1. Freitas A et al (2017) Effect of montmorillonite and chain extender on rheological, morphological and biodegradation behavior of PLA/PBAT blends. Polym Test 62:189–19510.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.030 ↗

2. Weng YX et al (2013) Biodegradation behavior of poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)(PBAT), poly (lactic acid)(PLA), and their blend under soil conditions. Polym Test 32:918–92610.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.05.001 ↗

3. Justin Koh J, Xiwen Z, Chaobin H (2018) Fully biodegradable Poly(lactic acid)/Starch blends: a review of toughening strategies. Int J Biol Macromol 109:99–11310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.048 ↗

4. Li YC et al (2024) Depolymerization and re/upcycling of biodegradable PLA plastics. ACS Omega 9:13500–13512

5. Zaaba NF, Jaafar M (2020) A review on degradation mechanisms of polylactic acid: hydrolytic, photodegradative, microbial, and enzymatic degradation. Polym Eng Sci 60:2061–207510.1002/pen.25511 ↗

6. Hu X, Chen Y (2024) Response mechanism of non-biodegradable polyethylene terephthalate microplastics and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics to nitrogen removal in activated sludge system. Sci Total Environ 917:17051610.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170516 ↗

7. Bi MH et al (2017) Particle size effect of BaTiO3 nanofillers on the energy storage performance of polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale 9:16386–1639510.1039/C7NR05212J ↗

8. Jiang L, Zhang JW, Wolcott MP (2007) Comparison of polylactide/nano-sized calcium carbonate and polylactide/montmorillonite composites: reinforcing effects and toughening mechanisms. Polymer 48:7632–764410.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.001 ↗

9. Rahmanifard M et al (2024) Reactive processing-microstructure-mechanical performance correlations in biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/expanded graphite nanocomposites. RSC Adv 14:794–80710.1039/D3RA06622C ↗

10. Jadhav H et al (2020) Potential of polylactide based nanocomposites-nanopolysaccharide filler for reinforcement purpose: a comprehensive review. J Polym Res 27:12310.1007/s10965-020-02287-y ↗

11. Ou ZQ et al (2021) Cellulose isolated from waste rubber wood and its application in PLA based composite films. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:66639910.3389/fbioe.2021.666399 ↗

12. Yan L et al (2024) Multiple noncovalent interactions tailored crystallization and performance reinforcement mechanisms of biopolyester composites with functional cellulose nanocrystals. Int J Biol Macromol 255:12826410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128264 ↗

13. Pinheiro IF et al (2017) Mechanical, rheological and degradation properties of PBAT nanocomposites reinforced by functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. Eur Polym J 97:356–36510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.10.026 ↗

14. Joo MJ, Auras R, Almenar E (2011) Preparation and characterization of blends made of poly(L-lactic acid) and β-cyclodextrin: improvement of the blend properties by using a masterbatch. Carbohydr Polym 86:1022–103010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.058 ↗

15. Byun Y et al (2015) Improved thermal stability of polylactic acid (PLA) composite film via PLA-β-cyclodextrin-inclusion complex systems. Int J Biol Macromol 81:591–59810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.036 ↗

16. Lu HF et al (2024) Construction of a three-dimensional network in branched PETG to prepare PETG composite microcellular foam with outstanding mechanical properties at low temperatures. Eur Polym J 202:11264310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112643 ↗

17. Li PP et al (2023) Biodegradable composites based on well-characterized cellulose and poly (butyleneadipate-co-terephthalate). BioResources 18:1916–193210.15376/biores.18.1.1916-1932 ↗

18. Gavrilov AA, Komarov PV, Khalatur PG (2015) Thermal properties and topology of epoxy networks: a multiscale simulation methodology. Macromolecules 48:206–21210.1021/ma502220k ↗

19. Singh SK, Chaurasia A, Verma A et al (2023) Basics of density functional theory, molecular dynamics, and monte carlo simulation techniques in materials science. In: Verma A (ed) Coating materials: computational aspects, applications and challenges. Springer, pp 111–12410.1007/978-981-99-3549-9_5 ↗

20. Lyulin SV et al (2014) Thermal properties of bulk polyimides: insights from computer modeling versus experiment. Soft Matter 10:1224–123210.1039/c3sm52521j ↗

21. Liew KM, He XQ, Wong CH (2004) On the study of elastic and plastic properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under axial tension using molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 52:2521–252710.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.043 ↗

22. Bo L et al (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation of three plastic additives’ diffusion in polyethylene terephthalate. Food Addit Contam Part A 34:1086–109910.1080/19440049.2017.1310398 ↗

23. Li H et al (2022) Cellulose nanofiber-assisted dispersion of halloysite nanotubes via silane coupling agent-reinforced starch-PVA biodegradable composite membrane. Membranes 12:16910.3390/membranes12020169 ↗

24. Qin ZY et al (2019) Preparation and characterization of soy protein isolate-based nanocomposite films with cellulose nanofibers and nano-silica via silane grafting. Polymers 11:183510.3390/polym11111835 ↗

25. Berendsen HJ et al (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–369010.1063/1.448118 ↗

26. Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 72:2384–239310.1063/1.439486 ↗

27. Rahmati M, Modarress H, Gooya R (2012) Molecular simulation study of polyurethane membranes. Polymer 53:1939–195010.1016/j.polymer.2012.02.051 ↗

28. Verlet L (1967) Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys Rev 159:98–10310.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗

29. Sun H et al (2016) COMPASS II: extended coverage for polymer and drug-like molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 30:475–487

30. Jensen B (2016) Investigation into the impact of solid surfaces in aqueous systems. Dissertation, University of Utah

31. Hou GY et al (2020) Exploiting synergistic experimental and computational approaches to design and fabricate high-performance elastomer. Macromolecules 53:6452–646010.1021/acs.macromol.0c01285 ↗

32. Wu C (2019) Free surface-induced glass-transition temperature suppression of simulated polymer chains. J Phys Chem C 123:9237–924610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01253 ↗

33. Shojaeiarani J, Bajwa DS, Chanda S (2021) Cellulose nanocrystal based composites: a review. Compos Part C Open Access 5:10016410.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100164 ↗

34. Altinbay A et al (2025) Reactivity of Joncryl chain extender in PLA/PBAT blends: effects of processing temperature and PBAT aging on blend performance. Int J Biol Macromol 303:14070310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140703 ↗

35. Shang W et al (2024) Molecular dynamics insight into the effect of chain extension and nonbond interaction in nanoparticle-enhanced plastic and elastomer double-phase recyclable polymer materials. Macromolecules 57:6990–700210.1021/acs.macromol.4c00914 ↗

36. Liu ZJ et al (2021) Cyclodextrin polymers: Structure, synthesis, and use as drug carriers. Prog Polym Sci 118:10140810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101408 ↗

37. Moud AA (2023) Polymer blends analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Polym Bull 80:5929–596410.1007/s00289-022-04394-w ↗

38. Naguib M et al (2024) Insights into particle dispersion and damage mechanisms in functionally graded metal matrix composites with random microstructure-based finite element model. Sci Rep 14:2083510.1038/s41598-024-70247-3 ↗

39. Chen R-Y et al (2025) Interfacial modulation of PLA/PBAT blends by synergistic toughening of reactive chain extenders with epoxidized natural rubber. Int J Biol Macromol 327:14751710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147517 ↗

40. Naguib M, Agwa MJ (2025) Comparative study on the mechanical behavior and damage evolution of metal matrix composites with diverse reinforcement orientations and gradients. Mech Adv Mater Struct 32:1–20

41. Kumar G, Mishra RR, Verma A et al (2022) Introduction to molecular dynamics simulations. In: Verma A (ed) Forcefields for atomistic-scale simulations: materials and applications. Springer, pp 1–19

42. Wu Q et al (2024) New simple strategy for improving interfacial adhesion of basalt fiber composites by adhering bio-based β-cyclodextrin on fiber. Compos Commun 45:10180510.1016/j.coco.2023.101805 ↗

43. Cao HN et al (2009) Fabrication of cyclodextrin-functionalized superparamagnetic Fe3O4/amino-silane core-shell nanoparticles via layer-by-layer method. Appl Surf Sci 255:7974–798010.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.199 ↗

44. Shang W et al (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation insight into topological structure dependence of self-healing polymer nanocomposites. Phys Chem Chem Phys 25:19046–1905710.1039/D3CP01309J ↗

45. Naguib M et al (2024) Computational damage analysis of metal matrix composites to identify optimum particle characteristics in indentation process. Eng Fract Mech 295:10975110.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109751 ↗