A double crosslinked self-healing hydrogel for light-based bioprinting toward bone tissue engineering

1. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT (2017) The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv 35:217–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.00610.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗

2. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.295810.1038/nbt.2958 ↗

3. Cui X, Li J, Hartanto Y, Durham M, Tang J, Zhang H, Hooper G, Lim K, Woodfield T (2020) Advances in extrusion 3D bioprinting: a focus on multicomponent hydrogel‐based bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20190164810.1002/adhm.201901648 ↗

4. Morgan FLC, Moroni L, Baker MB (2020) Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20190179810.1002/adhm.201901798 ↗

5. Ma D, Liu J, Lu WW, Liu W, Ruan C (2026) Dynamic bioinks for tissue/organ bioprinting: principle, challenge, and perspective. Prog Mater Sci 155:101527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.10152710.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101527 ↗

6. Wang H, Heilshorn SC (2015) Adaptable hydrogel networks with reversible linkages for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 27:3717–3736. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150155810.1002/adma.201501558 ↗

7. Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, Darnell M, Bencherif SA, Weaver JC, Huebsch N, Lee H, Lippens E, Duda GN, Mooney DJ (2016) Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater 15:326–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat448910.1038/nmat4489 ↗

8. Lou J, Stowers R, Nam S, Xia Y, Chaudhuri O (2018) Stress relaxing hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell culture. Biomaterials 154:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.004 ↗

9. Bertsch P, Diba M, Mooney DJ, Leeuwenburgh SCG (2023) Self-healing injectable hydrogels for tissue regeneration. Chem Rev 123:834–873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0017910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00179 ↗

10. Heidarian P, Kouzani AZ, Kaynak A, Paulino M, Nasri-Nasrabadi B (2019) Dynamic hydrogels and polymers as inks for three-dimensional printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0004710.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00047 ↗

11. Karvinen J, Kellomäki M (2024) 3D-bioprinting of self-healing hydrogels. Eur Polym J 209:112864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11286410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112864 ↗

12. Liu Y, Wong C-W, Chang S-W, Hsu S (2021) An injectable, self-healing phenol-functionalized chitosan hydrogel with fast gelling property and visible light-crosslinking capability for 3D printing. Acta Biomater 122:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.05110.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.051 ↗

13. Wu M, Han L, Yan B, Zeng H (2023) Self-healing hydrogels based on reversible noncovalent and dynamic covalent interactions: a short review. Supramol Mater 2:100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supmat.2023.10004510.1016/j.supmat.2023.100045 ↗

14. Picchioni F, Muljana H (2018) Hydrogels based on dynamic covalent and non covalent bonds: a chemistry perspective. Gels 4:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels401002110.3390/gels4010021 ↗

15. Yin H, Liu F, Abdiryim T, Liu X (2023) Self-healing hydrogels: from synthesis to multiple applications. ACS Mater Lett 5:1787–1830. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c0032010.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00320 ↗

16. Wang W, Narain R, Zeng H (2018) Rational design of self-healing tough hydrogels: a mini review. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.0049710.3389/fchem.2018.00497 ↗

17. Strandman S, Zhu XX (2016) Self-healing supramolecular hydrogels based on reversible physical interactions. Gels 2:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels202001610.3390/gels2020016 ↗

18. Hua J, Liu C, Fei B, Liu Z (2022) Self-healable and super-tough double-network hydrogel fibers from dynamic acylhydrazone bonding and supramolecular interactions. Gels 8:101. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels802010110.3390/gels8020101 ↗

19. Lu R, Zhou X, Peng K, Liu C, Yuan T, Li P, Zhang S (2024) High-density dynamic bonds cross-linked hydrogel with tissue adhesion, highly efficient self-healing behavior, and NIR photothermal antibacterial ability as dressing for wound repair. Biomacromol 25:2486–2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.3c0144310.1021/acs.biomac.3c01443 ↗

20. Hai M, Zhang Q, Li Z, Cheng M, Kuehne AJC, Shi F (2022) Visualizing polymer diffusion in hydrogel self-healing. Supramol Mater 1:100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supmat.2022.10000910.1016/j.supmat.2022.100009 ↗

21. Sirajuddin NA, Md Jamil MS, Mat Lazim MAS (2014) Effect of cross-link density and the healing efficiency of self-healing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel. E-Polymers 14:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2014-003610.1515/epoly-2014-0036 ↗

22. Li J, Mooney DJ (2016) Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater 1:16071. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7110.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 ↗

23. Yu X, Huang J, Yang F, Li J (2025) Rational design of self-healing hydrogel with high mechanical strength and self-healing efficiency: a short review. Gels 11:807. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels1110080710.3390/gels11100807 ↗

24. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.07610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗

25. Levato R, Dudaryeva O, Garciamendez-Mijares CE, Kirkpatrick BE, Rizzo R, Schimelman J, Anseth KS, Chen S, Zenobi-Wong M, Zhang YS (2023) Light-based vat-polymerization bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Primers 3:47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00231-010.1038/s43586-023-00231-0 ↗

26. Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, Sazer DW, Fortin CL, Zaita AJ, Greenfield PT, Calafat NJ, Gounley JP, Ta AH, Johansson F, Randles A, Rosenkrantz JE, Louis-Rosenberg JD, Galie PA, Stevens KR, Miller JS (1979) Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science 364:458–464. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav975010.1126/science.aav9750 ↗

27. Lee M, Rizzo R, Surman F, Zenobi-Wong M (2020) Guiding lights: tissue bioprinting using photoactivated materials. Chem Rev 120:10950–11027. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0007710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00077 ↗

28. Caprioli M, Roppolo I, Chiappone A, Larush L, Pirri CF, Magdassi S (2021) 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via Digital Light Processing. Nat Commun 12:2462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z ↗

29. Liu W, Cheong N, He Z, Zhang T (2025) Application of hydroxyapatite composites in bone tissue engineering: a review. J Funct Biomater 16:127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1604012710.3390/jfb16040127 ↗

30. Song P, Li M, Zhang B, Gui X, Han Y, Wang L, Zhou W, Guo L, Zhang Z, Li Z, Zhou C, Fan Y, Zhang X (2022) DLP fabricating of precision GelMA/HAp porous composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Compos B Eng 244:110163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11016310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110163 ↗

31. Gentry SP, Halloran JW (2015) Light scattering in absorbing ceramic suspensions: effect on the width and depth of photopolymerized features. J Eur Ceram Soc 35:1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.12.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.12.006 ↗

32. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, Dokmeci MR (2018) Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 6:915–946. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00765E10.1039/C7BM00765E ↗

33. Al-Emam E, Soenen H, Caen J, Janssens K (2020) Characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-borax/agarose (PVA-B/AG) double network hydrogel utilized for the cleaning of works of art. Herit Sci 8:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00447-310.1186/s40494-020-00447-3 ↗

34. Nam JW, Moon C-H, Kim D-H, Kim MH, Park WH (2024) Dynamically crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol)/borax strain sensors for organ motion monitoring. Chem Eng J 498:155748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15574810.1016/j.cej.2024.155748 ↗

35. Claaßen C, Claaßen MH, Truffault V, Sewald L, Tovar GEM, Borchers K, Southan A (2018) Quantification of substitution of gelatin methacryloyl: best practice and current pitfalls. Biomacromol 19:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0122110.1021/acs.biomac.7b01221 ↗

36. Karvinen J, Kellomäki M (2022) Characterization of self-healing hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur Polym J 181:111641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11164110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111641 ↗

37. Parthiban SP, Athirasala A, Tahayeri A, Abdelmoniem R, George A, Bertassoni LE (2021) BoneMA—synthesis and characterization of a methacrylated bone-derived hydrogel for bioprinting of in-vitro vascularized tissue constructs. Biofabrication 13:035031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abb11f10.1088/1758-5090/abb11f ↗

38. Han L, Lu X, Wang M, Gan D, Deng W, Wang K, Fang L, Liu K, Chan CW, Tang Y, Weng L, Yuan H (2017) A mussel‐inspired conductive, self‐adhesive, and self‐healable tough hydrogel as cell stimulators and implantable bioelectronics. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20160191610.1002/smll.201601916 ↗

39. Shirahama H, Lee BH, Tan LP, Cho N-J (2016) Precise tuning of facile one-pot gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) synthesis. Sci Rep 6:31036. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3103610.1038/srep31036 ↗

40. Zhu M, Wang Y, Ferracci G, Zheng J, Cho N-J, Lee BH (2019) Gelatin methacryloyl and its hydrogels with an exceptional degree of controllability and batch-to-batch consistency. Sci Rep 9:6863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42186-x10.1038/s41598-019-42186-x ↗

41. Wang H, Hu B, Li H, Feng G, Pan S, Chen Z, Li B, Song J (2022) Biomimetic mineralized hydroxyapatite nanofiber-incorporated methacrylated gelatin hydrogel with improved mechanical and osteoinductive performances for bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine 17:1511–1529. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S35412710.2147/IJN.S354127 ↗

42. Wang J, Wang X, Liang Z, Lan W, Wei Y, Hu Y, Wang L, Lei Q, Huang D (2023) Injectable antibacterial Ag-HA/ GelMA hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.121946010.3389/fbioe.2023.1219460 ↗

43. Amarbayasgalan N, Kim JH, Koh W-G, Muthuramalingam K, Lee HJ (2026) Hydroxyapatite-mediated mechanical modulation of GelMA hydrogels influences osteogenic differentiation of 3D spheroids. Gels 12:92. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels1201009210.3390/gels12010092 ↗

44. Aljaber MB, Alageel O, Chau DYS, Knowles JC (2025) Optimizing gelatin methacryloyl for craniofacial muscle regeneration: material design and application. Gels 11:945. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels1112094510.3390/gels11120945 ↗

45. Wang Y, Cao X, Ma M, Lu W, Zhang B, Guo Y (2020) A GelMA-PEGDA-nHA composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Materials 13:3735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1317373510.3390/ma13173735 ↗

46. Tilton M, Camilleri ET, Astudillo Potes MD, Gaihre B, Liu X, Lucien F, Elder BD, Lu L (2023) Visible light-induced 3D bioprinted injectable scaffold for minimally invasive tissue regeneration. Biomater Adv 153:213539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21353910.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213539 ↗

47. Li Y, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Hou D (2023) Recent progress of the vat photopolymerization technique in tissue engineering: a brief review of mechanisms, methods, materials, and applications. Polymers 15:3940. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1519394010.3390/polym15193940 ↗

48. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, Chen Y-W, Lee K-XA, Yeong WY, Shen Y-F (2020) Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication 12:022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab603410.1088/1758-5090/ab6034 ↗

49. Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, Piluso S, Eglin D, Malda J (2020) Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev 120:11028–11055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0008410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗

50. Duong VT, Lin C (2023) Digital light processing 3D bioprinting of gelatin‐norbornene hydrogel for enhanced vascularization. Macromol Biosci. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20230021310.1002/mabi.202300213 ↗

51. Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Fu J, Suo H (2018) 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:6849–6857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1605910.1021/acsami.7b16059 ↗

52. Lin Y-H, Liu E-W, Lin Y-J, Ng HY, Lee J-J, Hsu T-T (2023) The synergistic effect of electrical stimulation and dermal fibroblast cells-laden 3D conductive hydrogel for full-thickness wound healing. Int J Mol Sci 24:11698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24141169810.3390/ijms241411698 ↗

53. Zhao X, Lang Q, Yildirimer L, Lin ZY, Cui W, Annabi N, Ng KW, Dokmeci MR, Ghaemmaghami AM, Khademhosseini A (2016) Photocrosslinkable gelatin hydrogel for epidermal tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 5:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20150000510.1002/adhm.201500005 ↗

54. Chang S-Y, Ching T, Hashimoto M (2022) Bioprinting using PEGDMA-based hydrogel on DLP printer. Mater Today Proc 70:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.01710.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.017 ↗