Review: manufacturing processes, application advances, and recycling transformation of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites

1. Pakdel E, Kashi S, Varley R et al (2021) Recent progress in recycling carbon fibre reinforced composites and dry carbon fibre wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10534010.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105340 ↗

2. Mishnaevsky L, Branner K, Petersen H et al (2017) Materials for wind turbine blades: an overview. Materials (Basel) 10:1285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗

3. Wang S, Xing X, Zhang X et al (2018) Room-temperature fully recyclable carbon fibre reinforced phenolic composites through dynamic covalent boronic ester bonds. J Mater Chem A 6:10868–10878. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta01801d10.1039/c8ta01801d ↗

4. Veleva V, Bodkin G, Todorova S (2017) The need for better measurement and employee engagement to advance a circular economy: lessons from Biogen’s “zero waste” journey. J Clean Prod 154:517–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.17710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.177 ↗

5. Meng F, Olivetti EA, Zhao Y et al (2018) Comparing life cycle energy and global warming potential of carbon fiber composite recycling technologies and waste management options. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:9854–9865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0102610.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01026 ↗

6. Ateeq M (2023) A state of art review on recycling and remanufacturing of the carbon fiber from carbon fiber polymer composite. Composites Part C: Open Access 12:100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.10041210.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100412 ↗

7. Zhang J, Chevali VS, Wang H et al (2020) Current status of carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites recycling. Compos Part B Eng 193:108053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108053 ↗

8. Ouyang Z, Rao Q, Peng X (2022) Significantly improving thermal conductivity of carbon fiber polymer composite by weaving highly conductive films. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 163:107183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10718310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107183 ↗

9. Su H, An D, Ma L et al (2025) A survey of multi-scale optimization methods in fiber-reinforced polymer composites design for automobile applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407025132770610.1177/09544070251327706 ↗

10. Zhang J, Lin G, Vaidya U et al (2023) Past, present and future prospective of global carbon fibre composite developments and applications. Compos Part B: Eng 250:110463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11046310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110463 ↗

11. Meng Z, Liu S, Hu K et al (2024) A review on the cutting of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. Polym Compos 45:13459–13479. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2874810.1002/pc.28748 ↗

12. Du A, Chen H, Chen J et al (2024) Enhanced mechanical property and flame retardancy of halogen‐free PE/EVA composites through crosslinking and carbon fiber inclusion. Polym Compos 45:15704–15714. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2886410.1002/pc.28864 ↗

13. Wang S, Wang T, Zhang S et al (2023) Enhancing fiber-matrix interface in carbon fiber/poly ether ether ketone (CF/PEEK) composites by carbon nanotube reinforcement of crystalline PEEK sizing. Compos Part B Eng 251:110470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11047010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110470 ↗

14. Toro SA, González C, Fernández-Blázquez JP et al (2024) Fabrication and mechanical properties of a high-performance PEEK-PEI hybrid multilayered thermoplastic matrix composite reinforced with carbon fiber. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 185:108308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10830810.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108308 ↗

15. Akash NM, Saad S, Bari MAA et al (2024) Development of asphaltene-derived carbon fiber reinforced composites via additive manufacturing. Carbon 228:119413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.11941310.1016/j.carbon.2024.119413 ↗

16. Wang Z, Zhang B, Wang J (2024) Influences of isothermal annealing post‐treatment on mechanical performances in fused deposition modeling manufactured short carbon fibrous PETG and PA composites. Polym Eng Sci 64:6247–6264. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2698410.1002/pen.26984 ↗

17. Lorenzi E, Arrigo R, Frache A (2025) 3D printed polypropylene‐based multifunctional skin‐core structures for thermal conductivity. Polym Compos 46:15115–15124. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.3011710.1002/pc.30117 ↗

18. Ragosta G, Musto P, Martuscelli E et al (2000) Recycling of plastic car components: the case of a multilayer item based on polypropylene. J Mater Sci 35:3741–3751. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:100480880942210.1023/a:1004808809422 ↗

19. Ren T, Ma H, Zhan Y et al (2025) Influence of long‐term thermo‐oxidative treatment on the properties of carbon fiber/polycarbonate thermoplastic composites. Polym Compos 46:14345–14355. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.3006410.1002/pc.30064 ↗

20. Kim YS, Ko MJ, Kim SW et al (2024) Novel thermoplastic matrix resin with low processing temperature and good interfacial strength for carbon fiber-reinforced polyethersulfone. Compos Part B Eng 281:111503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11150310.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111503 ↗

21. Vivekanandhan S, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2012) Thermal, mechanical, and morphological investigation of injection molded poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/carbon fiber composites. Polym Compos 33:1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2233310.1002/pc.22333 ↗

22. Blaj M-I, Zaharia S-M, Morariu CO et al (2024) Tensile behavior of parts manufactured using a material extrusion process from a filament with short carbon fibers and PET matrix. Processes 12:334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1202033410.3390/pr12020334 ↗

23. Ye W, Dou H, Liu J et al (2024) Additive manufacture of programmable multi-matrix continuous carbon fiber reinforced gradient composites. Addit Manuf 89:104255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10425510.1016/j.addma.2024.104255 ↗

24. Quan D, Liu J, Yao L et al (2023) Interlaminar and intralaminar fracture resistance of recycled carbon fibre/PPS composites with tailored fibre/matrix adhesion. Compos Sci Technol 239:110051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11005110.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110051 ↗

25. Tian X, Liu T, Wang Q et al (2017) Recycling and remanufacturing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. J Clean Prod 142:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗

26. Liu Y, Li J, Kuang Y et al (2023) Effect of carbon nanotubes modification on bending fatigue properties of carbon fiber reinforced polyimide composites. Int J Fatigue 175:107814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10781410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107814 ↗

27. Wang HH, Huo S, Chevali V et al (2025) Carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics: from materials to manufacturing and applications. Adv Mater 37:2418709. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20241870910.1002/adma.202418709 ↗

28. Zol SM, Alauddin MS, Said Z et al (2023) Description of Poly(aryl-ether-ketone) materials (PAEKs), Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) for application as a dental material: a materials science review. Polymers 15:2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1509217010.3390/polym15092170 ↗

29. Li Y, Hao J-s, Zhou Y (2025) Economic analysis of different hydrogen production routes under a CO2 pricing mechanism – a levelized cost of hydrogen based study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 128:47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.18510.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.185 ↗

30. Prashanth GK, Gadewar M, Lalithamba HS et al (2024) Synthesis, and applications of carbon-integrated polymer composites and foams: a concise review. Inorg Chem Commun 166:112614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.11261410.1016/j.inoche.2024.112614 ↗

31. Ning H, Lu N, Hassen AA et al (2019) A review of long fibre thermoplastic (LFT) composites. Int Mater Rev 65:164–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2019.158500410.1080/09506608.2019.1585004 ↗

32. Gogoi R, Maurya AK, Manik G (2022) A review on recent development in carbon fiber reinforced polyolefin composites. Compos Part C Open Access 8:100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.10027910.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100279 ↗

33. Pervaiz S, Qureshi TA, Kashwani G et al (2021) 3D printing of fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: a status review. Materials (Basel) 14:4520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1416452010.3390/ma14164520 ↗

34. Almushaikeh AM, Alaswad SO, Alsuhybani MS et al (2023) Manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics and its recovery of carbon fiber: a review. Polym Test 122:108029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.10802910.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108029 ↗

35. Pasciucco F, Rossi D, Maccaferri E et al (2025) Recycling polyamide 6 fishing nets and carbon fibers for the development of novel sustainable composites: properties and LCA process analysis. J Clean Prod 486:144634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14463410.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144634 ↗

36. Dai L, Hu X, Zhao C et al (2024) Machine learning constructs the microstructure and mechanical properties that accelerate the development of CFRP pyrolysis for carbon-fiber recycling. Waste Manag 190:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.09.00210.1016/j.wasman.2024.09.002 ↗

37. Zhu J, Li H, Yi J et al (2025) Electromagnetic techniques in carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites manufacturing: a review. Compos Part B Eng 296:112227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11222710.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112227 ↗

38. Oromiehie E, Prusty BG, Compston P et al (2019) Automated fibre placement based composite structures: review on the defects, impacts and inspections techniques. Compos Struct 224:110987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11098710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110987 ↗

39. Massoud M, Vega G, Subburaj A et al (2023) Review on recycling energy resources and sustainability. Heliyon 9:e15107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1510710.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15107 ↗

40. Pickering SJ (2006) Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials—current status. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1206–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030 ↗

41. Liu Y, Farnsworth M, Tiwari A (2017) A review of optimisation techniques used in the composite recycling area: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod 140:1775–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.03810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.038 ↗

42. Deng Z, Fan J, Huang Z et al (2023) Efficient recycling of carbon fiber from carbon fiber reinforced composite and reuse as high performance electromagnetic shielding materials with superior mechanical strength. Polym Test 125:108110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.10811010.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108110 ↗

43. Qin B, Liu S, Xu JF (2023) Reversible amidation chemistry enables closed‐loop chemical recycling of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites to monomers and fibers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 62:e202311856. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20231185610.1002/anie.202311856 ↗

44. Xu M-x, Meng X-x, Ji H-w et al (2024) Evolution of pyrolysis char during the recovery of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite and its effects on the recovered carbon fiber. J Environ Chem Eng 12:112214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.11221410.1016/j.jece.2024.112214 ↗

45. Zhang W, Yu H, Yin B et al (2023) Sustainable transformation of end-of-life wind turbine blades: advancing clean energy solutions in civil engineering through recycling and upcycling. J Clean Prod 426:139184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13918410.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139184 ↗

46. Nabavi SF, Dalir H (2025) A review on laser-assisted manufacturing process of thermoset composites: a review of fundamentals, processes, scientific modelling, challenges and prospective. Opt Laser Technol 181:111713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.11171310.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111713 ↗

47. Yao S-S, Jin F-L, Rhee KY et al (2018) Recent advances in carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites: a review. Compos Part B Eng 142:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007 ↗

48. Cimino A, Elbasheer M, Longo F et al (2025) Automatic simulation models generation in industrial systems: a systematic literature review and outlook towards simulation technology in the Industry 5.0. J Manuf Syst 80:859–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.03.02710.1016/j.jmsy.2025.03.027 ↗

49. Khan N, Riccio A (2024) A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: current trends and future directions. Prog Aerosp Sci 149:101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.10102110.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101021 ↗

50. Kaczmarek D, Walczyk D, Garofalo J et al (2021) An investigation of in situ impregnation for additive manufacturing of thermoplastic composites. J Manuf Process 64:972–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.01810.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.018 ↗

51. Xu X, Peng G, Zhang B et al (2025) Material performance, manufacturing methods, and engineering applications in aviation of carbon fiber reinforced polymers: a comprehensive review. Thin-Walled Struct 209:112899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.11289910.1016/j.tws.2024.112899 ↗

52. Hanchi J, Eiss NS (1997) Dry sliding friction and wear of short carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK) at elevated temperatures. Wear 203–204:380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07347-410.1016/s0043-1648(96)07347-4 ↗

53. Kim DW, Jin CK, Lee MS et al (2014) Investigation of optimal lamination condition of CFRTP by compression molding method and a comparison of mechanical properties with CFRTS. Adv Mech Eng 12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781402098625210.1177/1687814020986252 ↗

54. Zakaria MR, Ahmad Thirmizir MZ, Zainol Abidin MS et al (2023) A comparison process between wet lay-up, single vacuum bagging and double vacuum bagging toward natural fibre (palm, coconut and kenaf) reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Fibers Polym 24:2107–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00204-w10.1007/s12221-023-00204-w ↗

55. Ramachandran K, Gnanasagaran CL, Vekariya A (2023) Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber and bio-fiber composites prepared via vacuum bagging technique. J Manuf Process 89:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.06810.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.068 ↗

56. Minchenkov K, Vedernikov A, Safonov A et al (2021) Thermoplastic pultrusion: a review. Polymers 13:180. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1302018010.3390/polym13020180 ↗

57. Cestari SP, Martin JP, Hanna RP et al (2021) Use of virgin/recycled polyethylene blends in rotational moulding. J Polym Eng 41:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2021-006510.1515/polyeng-2021-0065 ↗

58. Surace R, Pagano C, Bellantone V et al (2021) Injection vs micro-injection molding of nano-particle filled polyamide 6: moldability and structuring. Polymer 230:124035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12403510.1016/j.polymer.2021.124035 ↗

59. Verma N, Singh MK, Zafar S et al (2021) Comparative study of in-situ temperature measurement during microwave-assisted compression-molding and conventionally compression-molding process. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35:336–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.00510.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.005 ↗

60. Lessard F, Dubé M, Laberge Lebel L (2022) A model of multi-die thermoplastic pultrusion. Compos Part B Eng 247:110319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11031910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110319 ↗

61. Korniejenko K, Łach M, Chou S-Y et al (2020) Mechanical properties of short fiber-reinforced geopolymers made by casted and 3D printing methods: a comparative study. Materials (Basel) 13:579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1303057910.3390/ma13030579 ↗

62. Sun D, Lin G, Sui G et al (2015) Multi‐gating injection molding to enhance the thermal conductivity of carbon fiber/polysulfone composite. Polym Compos 38:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2357410.1002/pc.23574 ↗

63. Frketic J, Dickens T, Ramakrishnan S (2017) Automated manufacturing and processing of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: an additive review of contemporary and modern techniques for advanced materials manufacturing. Addit Manuf 14:69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.01.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.01.003 ↗

64. Fereidouni M, Hoa SV (2024) In-situ consolidation of thermoplastic composites by automated fiber placement: characterization of defects. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 38:471–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705724125183710.1177/08927057241251837 ↗

65. Ricard T (2017) Automated preform manufacture at an affordable price. Reinforced Plast 61:149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2017.02.00410.1016/j.repl.2017.02.004 ↗

66. Hofstätter T, Pedersen DB, Tosello G et al (2017) State-of-the-art of fiber-reinforced polymers in additive manufacturing technologies. J Reinf Plast Compos 36:1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441769564810.1177/0731684417695648 ↗

67. Ma Q, Ge J, Rejab MRM et al (2021) Fabrication of the carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) cone tube through the laboratory-scale 3-axis winding machine. Mater Today: Proc 46:1645–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.25910.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.259 ↗

68. Wittig J (2005) Process automation for the production of large composite parts. Reinf Plast 49:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-3617(05)00519-910.1016/s0034-3617(05)00519-9 ↗

69. Carosella S, Hügle S, Helber F et al (2024) A short review on recent advances in automated fiber placement and filament winding technologies. Compos Part B: Eng 287:111843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11184310.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111843 ↗

70. Sorrentino L, Anamateros E, Bellini C et al (2019) Robotic filament winding: an innovative technology to manufacture complex shape structural parts. Compos Struct 220:699–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.055 ↗

71. Früh N, Knippers J (2021) Multi-stage filament winding: integrative design and fabrication method for fibre-reinforced composite components of complex geometries. Compos Struct 268:113969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11396910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113969 ↗

72. Mindermann P, Witt M-U, Gresser GT (2022) Pultrusion-winding: a novel fabrication method for coreless wound fiber-reinforced thermoset composites with distinct cross-section. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 154:106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10676310.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106763 ↗

73. Bodea S, Zechmeister C, Dambrosio N et al (2021) Robotic coreless filament winding for hyperboloid tubular composite components in construction. Automn Constr 126:103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10364910.1016/j.autcon.2021.103649 ↗

74. Duque Estrada R, Kannenberg F, Wagner HJ et al (2020) Spatial winding: cooperative heterogeneous multi-robot system for fibrous structures. Constr Robot 4:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-020-00036-710.1007/s41693-020-00036-7 ↗

75. Hildebrandt H, Mengxi He, Chen P-A, et al (2024) Slack pack: fabrication system for the dual robotic winding of spatial fiber structures. In: Physical Intelligence CDRF 2023 Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (ed Yan C, Chai H, Sun T, Yuan PF), Singapore, pp 476–491. Springer10.1007/978-981-99-8405-3_40 ↗

76. Alves de Campos A, Henriques E, Magee CL (2022) Technological improvement rates and recent innovation trajectories in automated advanced composites manufacturing technologies: a patent-based analysis. Compos Part B Eng 238:109888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10988810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109888 ↗

77. Ji Y, Luan C, Cheng L et al (2024) Real-time in-situ process monitoring method based on the self-conductivity of carbon fiber prepreg for automated fiber placement (AFP). Compos Part B Eng 276:111356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11135610.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111356 ↗

78. Boon YD, Joshi SC, Bhudolia SK (2021) Review: filament winding and automated fiber placement with in situ consolidation for fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites. Polymers (Basel) 13:1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1312195110.3390/polym13121951 ↗

79. Khan M, McNally C (2024) Recent developments on low carbon 3D printing concrete: revolutionizing construction through innovative technology. Clean Mater 12:100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.10025110.1016/j.clema.2024.100251 ↗

80. van de Werken N, Tekinalp H, Khanbolouki P et al (2020) Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf 31:100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10096210.1016/j.addma.2019.100962 ↗

81. Majko J, Sága M, Vaško M et al (2020) FE modeling of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite structures produced by additive manufacturing. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 776:012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/776/1/01208010.1088/1757-899x/776/1/012080 ↗

82. Jiang G, Pickering SJ (2015) Structure–property relationship of recycled carbon fibres revealed by pyrolysis recycling process. J Mater Sci 51:1949–1958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9502-210.1007/s10853-015-9502-2 ↗

83. Tan LJ, Zhu W, Zhou K (2020) Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Adv Funct Mater 30:2003062. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200306210.1002/adfm.202003062 ↗

84. Liu Q, Ge R, Li C et al (2023) Digital design and additive manufacturing of structural materials in electrochemical and thermal energy storage systems: a review. Virt Phys Prototyp 18:e2273949. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.227394910.1080/17452759.2023.2273949 ↗

85. Ma J, Zheng S, Fu Y et al (2024) The status and challenging perspectives of 3D-printed micro-batteries. Chem Sci 15:5451–5481. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sc06999k10.1039/d3sc06999k ↗

86. Yang L, Wu S, Yan C et al (2021) Fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V gyroid graded lattice structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion with lateral loading. Addit Manuf 46:102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10221410.1016/j.addma.2021.102214 ↗

87. Zhang C, Zheng H, Yang L et al (2022) Mechanical responses of sheet-based gyroid-type triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures fabricated using selective laser melting. Mater Des 214:110407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11040710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110407 ↗

88. Zhang Z, Long Y, Yang Z et al (2022) An investigation into printing pressure of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 162:107162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10716210.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107162 ↗

89. Clancy G, Peeters D, Oliveri V et al (2019) A study of the influence of processing parameters on steering of carbon Fibre/PEEK tapes using laser-assisted tape placement. Compos Part B Eng 163:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.033 ↗

90. Prüß H, Vietor T (2015) Design for fiber-reinforced additive manufacturing. J Mech Design 137:111409. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403099310.1115/1.4030993 ↗

91. International A (2015) standard terminology for additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology. ISO/ASTM52900–15.

92. Chacón JM, Caminero MA, Núñez PJ et al (2019) Additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 181:107688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10768810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107688 ↗

93. Jiang L, Zhou Y, Jin F (2022) Design of short fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites: a review. Polym Compos 43:4835–4847. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2681710.1002/pc.26817 ↗

94. Wang P, Zou B, Ding S et al (2020) Preparation of short CF/GF reinforced PEEK composite filaments and their comprehensive properties evaluation for FDM-3D printing. Compos Part B Eng 198:108175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10817510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108175 ↗

95. Gupta A, Fidan I, Hasanov S et al (2020) Processing, mechanical characterization, and micrography of 3D-printed short carbon fiber reinforced polycarbonate polymer matrix composite material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3185–3205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z ↗

96. Yu N, Sun X, Wang Z et al (2020) Effects of auxiliary heat on warpage and mechanical properties in carbon fiber/ABS composite manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Mater Design 195:108978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10897810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108978 ↗

97. Li X, He J, Hu Z et al (2022) High strength carbon-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites additively manufactured by screw-based extrusion. Compos Sci Technol 229:109707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10970710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109707 ↗

98. Subramaniyan M, Karuppan S, Appusamy A et al (2025) Sandwich printing of PLA and carbon fiber reinforced-PLA for enhancing tensile and impact strength of additive manufactured parts. J Manuf Process 137:425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.001 ↗

99. Lu S, Zhang B, Niu J et al (2024) High-strength carbon fiber-reinforced polyether-ether-ketone composites with longer fiber retention length manufactured via screw extrusion-based 3D printing. Addit Manuf 86:104200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10420010.1016/j.addma.2024.104200 ↗

100. Li L, Liu W, Sun L (2022) Mechanical characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 227:109618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10961810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109618 ↗