Sustainable smart geopolymers—from earth-derived materials to high-performance functional applications

1. Shafeek AM, Khedr M, El-Dek S, Shehata N (2020) Influence of ZnO nanoparticle ratio and size on mechanical properties and whiteness of White Portland Cement. Appl Nanosci 10(9):3603–361510.1007/s13204-020-01444-5 ↗

2. Alfaifi SM, Balu R, Chiang K, Choudhury NR, Dutta NK (2025) Electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: significant advances, major challenges, and future directions. ACS Catal 15:9301–934510.1021/acscatal.5c00903 ↗

3. Elsaid K, Olabi A, Wilberforce T, Abdelkareem MA, Sayed ET (2021) Environmental impacts of nanofluids: a review. Sci Total Environ 763:14420210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144202 ↗

4. Elsaid K, Sayed ET, Abdelkareem MA, Baroutaji A, Olabi y (2020) Environmental impact of desalination processes: mitigation and control strategies. Sci Total Environ 740:14012510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140125 ↗

5. Elsaid K, Sayed ET, Abdelkareem MA, Mahmoud MS, Ramadan M, Olabi A (2020) Environmental impact of emerging desalination technologies: a preliminary evaluation. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):10409910.1016/j.jece.2020.104099 ↗

6. Elsaid K, Sayed ET, Yousef BA, Rabaia MKH, Abdelkareem MA et al (2020) Recent progress on the utilization of waste heat for desalination: a review. Energy Convers Manag 221:11310510.1016/j.enconman.2020.113105 ↗

7. Fierro JJ, Escudero-Atehortua A, Nieto-Londoño C, Giraldo M, Jouhara H, Wrobel LC (2020) Evaluation of waste heat recovery technologies for the cement industry. Int J Thermofluids 7:10004010.1016/j.ijft.2020.100040 ↗

8. Ribeiro JM, Dias DFC, Nika E, Delpech B, Katsou E, Jouhara H (2025) Circularity assessment of industrial heat exchanger and water treatment systems integration. Therm Sci Eng Prog. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2025.10366110.1016/j.tsep.2025.103661 ↗

9. Olabi A, Elsaid K, Rabaia MKH, Askalany AA, Abdelkareem MA (2020) Waste heat-driven desalination systems: perspective. Energy 209:11837310.1016/j.energy.2020.118373 ↗

10. Shehata N, Mohamed HS, Emam HM, Ahmed S (2017) Fuel produced from catalytic pyrolysis of waste plastic. Emirat J Eng Res 22:1–6

11. Abdelkareem MA, Sayed ET, Nakagawa N (2020) Significance of diffusion layers on the performance of liquid and vapor feed passive direct methanol fuel cells. Energy 209:11849210.1016/j.energy.2020.118492 ↗

12. Abdelkareem MA, Sayed ET, Mohamed HO, Obaid M, Rezk H, Chae K-J (2020) Nonprecious anodic catalysts for low-molecular-hydrocarbon fuel cells: theoretical consideration and current progress. Prog Energy Combust Sci 77:10080510.1016/j.pecs.2019.100805 ↗

13. Olabi A, Wilberforce T, Sayed ET, Elsaid K, Rezk H, Abdelkareem MA (2020) Recent progress of graphene based nanomaterials in bioelectrochemical systems. Sci Total Environ 749:14122510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141225 ↗

14. Sayed ET, Shehata N, Abdelkareem MA, Atieh MA (2020) Recent progress in environmentally friendly bio-electrochemical devices for simultaneous water desalination and wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 748:14104610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141046 ↗

15. Kamel A, Rezk H, Shehata N, Thomas J (2019) Energy management of a DC microgrid composed of photovoltaic/fuel cell/battery/supercapacitor systems. Batteries 5(3):6310.3390/batteries5030063 ↗

16. Rezk H, Sayed ET, Al-Dhaifallah M, Obaid M, Abou Hashema M, Abdelkareem MA et al (2019) Fuel cell as an effective energy storage in reverse osmosis desalination plant powered by photovoltaic system. Energy 175:423–43310.1016/j.energy.2019.02.167 ↗

17. Wilberforce T, Baroutaji A, El Hassan Z, Thompson J, Soudan B, Olabi AG (2019) Prospects and challenges of concentrated solar photovoltaics and enhanced geothermal energy technologies. Sci Total Environ 659:851–86110.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.257 ↗

18. Soudan B (2019) Community-scale baseload generation from marine energy. Energy 189:11613410.1016/j.energy.2019.116134 ↗

19. Inayat A, Nassef AM, Rezk H, Sayed ET, Abdelkareem MA, Olabi A (2019) Fuzzy modeling and parameters optimization for the enhancement of biodiesel production from waste frying oil over montmorillonite clay K-30. Sci Total Environ 666:821–82710.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.321 ↗

20. Sayed ET, Alawadhi H, Elsaid K, Olabi A, Adel Almakrani M, Bin Tamim ST et al (2020) A carbon-cloth anode electroplated with iron nanostructure for microbial fuel cell operated with real wastewater. Sustainability 12(16):653810.3390/su12166538 ↗

21. Aiken TA, Kwasny J, Sha W, Soutsos MN (2018) Effect of slag content and activator dosage on the resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to sulfuric acid attack. Cem Concr Res 111:23–4010.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.011 ↗

22. Aliques-Granero J, Tognonvi MT, Tagnit-Hamou A (2019) Durability study of AAMs: sulfate attack resistance. Constr Build Mater 229:11710010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117100 ↗

23. Lahoti M, Tan KH, Yang E-H (2019) A critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications. Constr Build Mater 221:514–52610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.076 ↗

24. da Rocha Segundo IG, Margalho ÉM, Lima Jr ODS, Pinheiro CGdS, de Freitas EF, Carneiro JASO (2023) Smart asphalt mixtures: a bibliometric analysis of the research trends. Coatings 3(8):139610.3390/coatings13081396 ↗

25. Shill SK, Al-Deen S, Ashraf M, Hutchison W (2020) Resistance of fly ash based geopolymer mortar to both chemicals and high thermal cycles simultaneously. Constr Build Mater 239:11788610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117886 ↗

26. Vafaei M, Allahverdi A, Dong P, Bassim N (2018) Acid attack on geopolymer cement mortar based on waste-glass powder and calcium aluminate cement at mild concentration. Constr Build Mater 193:363–37210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.203 ↗

27. Abdel-Ghani NT, Elsayed HA, AbdelMoied S (2018) Geopolymer synthesis by the alkali-activation of blastfurnace steel slag and its fire-resistance. HBRC J 14(2):159–16410.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.06.001 ↗

28. Lv X, Wang K, He Y, Cui X (2019) A green drying powder inorganic coating based on geopolymer technology. Constr Build Mater 214:441–44810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.163 ↗

29. Wang K-t, Tang Q, Cui X-m, He Y, Liu L-p (2016) Development of near-zero water consumption cement materials via the geopolymerization of tektites and its implication for lunar construction. Sci Rep 6(1):2965910.1038/srep29659 ↗

30. Liu J, Hu L, Tang L, Ren J (2021) Utilisation of municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash with metakaolin for preparation of alkali-activated cementitious material. J Hazard Mater 402:12345110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123451 ↗

31. Dindi A, Quang DV, Vega LF, Nashef E, Abu-Zahra MR (2019) Applications of fly ash for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage. J CO2 Util 29:82–10210.1016/j.jcou.2018.11.011 ↗

32. Li Y-C, Min X-B, Ke Y, Chai L-Y, Shi M-Q, Tang C-J et al (2018) Utilization of red mud and Pb/Zn smelter waste for the synthesis of a red mud-based cementitious material. J Hazard Mater 344:343–34910.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.046 ↗

33. Yang Z, Mocadlo R, Zhao M, Sisson JRD, Tao M, Liang J (2019) Preparation of a geopolymer from red mud slurry and class F fly ash and its behavior at elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 221:308–31710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.034 ↗

34. Zhao Y, Liang N, Chen H, Li Y (2020) Preparation and properties of sintering red mud unburned road brick using orthogonal experiments. Constr Build Mater 238:11773910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117739 ↗

35. Zhang J, Zhang S, Liu B (2020) Degradation technologies and mechanisms of dioxins in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: a review. J Clean Prod 250:11950710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119507 ↗

36. Davidovits J (2017) Geopolymers: Ceramic-like inorganic polymers. J Ceram Sci Technol 8(3):335–350

37. Davidovits J (1976) Solid phase synthesis of mineral blockpolymer by low temperature polycondensation of alumino-silicate polymers

38. Provis J, Van Deventer J (2007) Geopolymerisation kinetics, 2: reaction kinetic modelling. Chem Eng Sci 62(9):2318–2910.1016/j.ces.2007.01.028 ↗

39. Ren D, Yan C, Duan P, Zhang Z, Li L, Yan Z (2017) Durability performances of wollastonite, tremolite and basalt fiber-reinforced metakaolin geopolymer composites under sulfate and chloride attack. Constr Build Mater 134:56–6610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.103 ↗

40. De Silva P, Sagoe-Crenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V (2007) Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cem Concr Res 37(4):512–51810.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.003 ↗

41. Prasanphan S, Wannagon A, Kobayashi T, Jiemsirilers S (2019) Reaction mechanisms of calcined kaolin processing waste-based geopolymers in the presence of low alkali activator solution. Constr Build Mater 221:409–42010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.116 ↗

42. Zhang Z, Wang H, Provis JL, Bullen F, Reid A, Zhu Y (2012) Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 1. The activation of metakaolin with sodium hydroxide. Thermochim Acta 539:23–3310.1016/j.tca.2012.03.021 ↗

43. Zhang M, Zhao M, Zhang G, Sietins JM, Granados-Focil S, Pepi MS et al (2018) Reaction kinetics of red mud-fly ash based geopolymers: effects of curing temperature on chemical bonding, porosity, and mechanical strength. Cement Concr Compos 93:175–18510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.008 ↗

44. Lakshmi UR, Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Lataye DH (2009) Rice husk ash as an effective adsorbent: Evaluation of adsorptive characteristics for Indigo Carmine dye. J Environ Manage 90(2):710–72010.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.002 ↗

45. Izquierdo M, Querol X, Davidovits J, Antenucci D, Nugteren H, Fernández-Pereira C (2009) Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: microstructure and metal leaching. J Hazard Mater 166(1):561–56610.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.063 ↗

46. Davidovits J, Davidovits F (2020) Ancient geopolymers in South-American Monuments, part IV (: use of natural andesite volcanic sand (not crushed). Geopolym Archaeol 1:36–43

47. Grady FS, Boes AD, Geerling JC (2022) A century searching for the neurons necessary for wakefulness. Front Neurosci 16:93051410.3389/fnins.2022.930514 ↗

48. Rangan BV (2008) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Curtin Univ Technol 7:1

49. Xu H, Van Deventer JS (2002) Geopolymerisation of multiple minerals. Miner Eng 15(12):1131–113910.1016/S0892-6875(02)00255-8 ↗

50. Chawakitchareon P, Veesommaia C (2013) Geopolymer mortar production using silica waste as raw material. Am Trans Eng Appl Sci 2(1):3–13

51. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JS (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42:2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-006-0637-Z10.1007/S10853-006-0637-Z ↗

52. Singh B, Mackinnon IDR, Page D (2001) Process for forming alumino-silicate derivatives. Google Patents 2001

53. Horsley C, Tsaknopoulos DG, Fitzpatrick-Schmidt KL, Zhang Y (2015) Geopolymer-the green cement

54. Cong P, Cheng Y (2021) Advances in geopolymer materials: a comprehensive review. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Ed) 8(3):283–314

55. Zain H, Abdullah MMAB, Hussin K, Ariffin N, Bayuaji R (2017) Review on various types of geopolymer materials with the environmental impact assessment. In: MATEC web of conferences: EDP sciences, p 0102110.1051/matecconf/20179701021 ↗

56. Wang J-t, Ge Y-y, He Y, Xu M-x, Cui X-m (2019) A porous gradient geopolymer-based tube membrane with high PM removal rate for air pollution. J Clean Prod 217:335–34310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.268 ↗

57. Sellami M, Barre M, Toumi M (2019) Synthesis, thermal properties and electrical conductivity of phosphoric acid-based geopolymer with metakaolin. Appl Clay Sci 180:10519210.1016/j.clay.2019.105192 ↗

58. Sekkal W, Zaoui A (2022) High strength metakaolin-based geopolymer reinforced by pristine and covalent functionalized carbon nanotubes. Constr Build Mater 327:12691010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126910 ↗

59. Villaquirán-Caicedo MA (2019) Studying different silica sources for preparation of alternative waterglass used in preparation of binary geopolymer binders from metakaolin/boiler slag. Constr Build Mater 227:11662110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.002 ↗

60. Istuque D, Soriano L, Akasaki J, Melges J, Borrachero M, Monzó J et al (2019) Effect of sewage sludge ash on mechanical and microstructural properties of geopolymers based on metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 203:95–10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.093 ↗

61. Jiang Y, Ling T-C, Mo KH, Shi C (2019) A critical review of waste glass powder–multiple roles of utilization in cement-based materials and construction products. J Environ Manage 242:440–44910.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.098 ↗

62. Dey A, Rumman R, Wakjira TG, Jindal A, Bediwy AG, Islam MS et al (2024) Towards net-zero emission: a case study investigating sustainability potential of geopolymer concrete with recycled glass powder and gold mine tailings. J Build Eng 86:10868310.1016/j.jobe.2024.108683 ↗

63. Çelik Aİ, Tunç U, Bahrami A, Karalar M, Mydin MAO, Alomayri T et al (2023) Use of waste glass powder toward more sustainable geopolymer concrete. J Mater Res Technol 24:8533–854610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.094 ↗

64. Mathew G, Issac BM (2020) Effect of molarity of sodium hydroxide on the aluminosilicate content in laterite aggregate of laterised geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 32:10148610.1016/j.jobe.2020.101486 ↗

65. Ergün A (2011) Effects of the usage of diatomite and waste marble powder as partial replacement of cement on the mechanical properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(2):806–81210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.002 ↗

66. Boukhelkhal A, Azzouz L, Belaïdi ASE, Benabed B (2016) Effects of marble powder as a partial replacement of cement on some engineering properties of self-compacting concrete. J Adhes Sci Technol 30(22):2405–241910.1080/01694243.2016.1184402 ↗

67. Nikolov A, Nugteren H, Rostovsky I (2020) Optimization of geopolymers based on natural zeolite clinoptilolite by calcination and use of aluminate activators. Constr Build Mater 243:11825710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118257 ↗

68. Bayiha BN, Billong N, Yamb E, Kaze RC, Nzengwa R (2019) Effect of limestone dosages on some properties of geopolymer from thermally activated halloysite. Constr Build Mater 217:28–3510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.058 ↗

69. Hassan HS, Abdel-Gawwad H, Vásquez-García S, Israde-Alcántara I, Flores-Ramirez N, Rico J et al (2019) Cleaner production of one-part white geopolymer cement using pre-treated wood biomass ash and diatomite. J Clean Prod 209:1420–142810.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.137 ↗

70. Gholampour A, Ozbakkaloglu T, Ng C-T (2019) Ambient-and oven-cured geopolymer concretes under active confinement. Constr Build Mater 228:11672210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116722 ↗

71. Naghizadeh A, Ekolu S (2019) Behaviour of fly ash geopolymer binders under exposure to alkaline media. Asian J Civ Eng 20:785–79810.1007/s42107-019-00144-y ↗

72. Khan I, Xu T, Castel A, Gilbert RI, Babaee M (2019) Risk of early age cracking in geopolymer concrete due to restrained shrinkage. Constr Build Mater 229:11684010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116840 ↗

73. Rashad AM, Mohamed RA-E, Zeedan SR, El-Gamal A (2024) Basalt powder as a promising candidate material for improving the properties of fly ash geopolymer cement. Constr Build Mater 435:13680510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136805 ↗

74. Lei S, Gao H, Dai H, Bernardo E, Zhang H, Yang Q et al (2023) Characteristics of lightweight geopolymers from microwave curing of basalt and waste glass powder mixtures. Constr Build Mater 409:13375810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133758 ↗

75. Mohammed BS, Haruna S, Wahab M, Liew M, Haruna A (2019) Mechanical and microstructural properties of high calcium fly ash one-part geopolymer cement made with granular activator. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0225510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02255 ↗

76. De Rossi A, Ribeiro M, Labrincha J, Novais R, Hotza D, Moreira R (2019) Effect of the particle size range of construction and demolition waste on the fresh and hardened-state properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars with total replacement of sand. Process Saf Environ Prot 129:130–13710.1016/j.psep.2019.06.026 ↗

77. Bouaissi A, Li L-y, Abdullah MMAB, Bui Q-B (2019) Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA-GGBS-HMNS based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 210:198–20910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.202 ↗

78. Yu Z, Song W, Li J, Li Q (2020) Improved simultaneous adsorption of Cu (II) and Cr (VI) of organic modified metakaolin-based geopolymer. Arab J Chem 13(3):4811–482310.1016/j.arabjc.2020.01.001 ↗

79. Soultana A, Valouma A, Bartzas G, Komnitsas K (2019) Properties of inorganic polymers produced from brick waste and metallurgical slag. Minerals 9(9):55110.3390/min9090551 ↗

80. Alonso M, Gascó C, Morales MM, Suárez-Navarro J, Zamorano M, Puertas F (2019) Olive biomass ash as an alternative activator in geopolymer formation: a study of strength, radiology and leaching behaviour. Cem Concr Compos 104:10338410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103384 ↗

81. Shilar FA, Ganachari SV, Patil VB, Nisar KS, Abdel-Aty A-H, Yahia I (2022) Evaluation of the effect of granite waste powder by varying the molarity of activator on the mechanical properties of ground granulated blast-furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete. Polymers 14(2):30610.3390/polym14020306 ↗

82. Li Z, Zhang J, Li S, Gao Y, Liu C, Qi Y (2020) Effect of different gypsums on the workability and mechanical properties of red mud-slag based grouting materials. J Clean Prod 245:11875910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118759 ↗

83. Yang T, Wang Y, Sheng L, He C, Sun W, He Q (2020) Enhancing Cd (II) sorption by red mud with heat treatment: performance and mechanisms of sorption. J Environ Manage 255:10986610.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109866 ↗

84. Kheimi M, Aziz IH, Abdullah MMAB, Almadani M, Abd Razak R (2022) Waste material via geopolymerization for heavy-duty application: a review. Materials (Basel) 15(9):320510.3390/ma15093205 ↗

85. Ahmed A, Ameer S, Abbas S, Abbass W, Razzaq A, Mohamed AM et al (2022) Effectiveness of ternary blend incorporating rice husk ash, silica fume, and cement in preparing ASR resilient concrete. Materials (Basel) 15(6):212510.3390/ma15062125 ↗

86. Duan P, Yan C, Luo W (2016) A novel waterproof, fast setting and high early strength repair material derived from metakaolin geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 124:69–7310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.058 ↗

87. Cai J, Li X, Tan J, Vandevyvere B (2020) Thermal and compressive behaviors of fly ash and metakaolin-based geopolymer. J Build Eng 30:10130710.1016/j.jobe.2020.101307 ↗

88. Huseien GF, Mirza J, Ismail M, Ghoshal S, Ariffin MAM (2018) Effect of metakaolin replaced granulated blast furnace slag on fresh and early strength properties of geopolymer mortar. Ain Shams Eng J 9(4):1557–156610.1016/j.asej.2016.11.011 ↗

89. Gao H, Liu H, Liao L, Mei L, Zhang F, Zhang L et al (2020) A bifunctional hierarchical porous kaolinite geopolymer with good performance in thermal and sound insulation. Constr Build Mater 251:11888810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118888 ↗

90. da Luz Prof CA (2021) Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and hardness of geopolymeric cement synthetized from non-calcined natural kaolin. J Clean Prod 280:12429310.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124293 ↗

91. Assaedi H, Shaikh F, Low IM (2016) Influence of mixing methods of nano silica on the microstructural and mechanical properties of flax fabric reinforced geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 123:541–55210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.049 ↗

92. Khater HM (2016) Effect of nano-silica on microstructure formation of low-cost geopolymer binder. Nanocomposites 2(2):84–9710.1080/20550324.2016.1203515 ↗

93. Assaedi H, Shaikh F, Low IM (2017) Effect of nanoclay on durability and mechanical properties of flax fabric reinforced geopolymer composites. J Asian Ceram Soc 5(1):62–7010.1016/j.jascer.2017.01.003 ↗

94. Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2014) Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 70:453–45910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.093 ↗

95. Gao K, Lin K-L, Wang D, Hwang C-L, Tuan BLA, Shiu H-S et al (2013) Effect of nano-SiO2 on the alkali-activated characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 48:441–44710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.027 ↗

96. Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S (2015) Effects of nano-silica on the strength development of geopolymer cured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 101:675–68310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.044 ↗

97. Shaikh F, Supit S, Sarker P (2014) A study on the effect of nano silica on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes. Mater Des 60:433–44210.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.025 ↗

98. Naskar S, Chakraborty AK (2016) Effect of nano materials in geopolymer concrete. Perspect Sci 8:273–27510.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.049 ↗

99. Guefrech A, Mounanga P, Khelidj A (2011) Experimental study of the effect of addition of nano-silica on the behaviour of cement mortars Mounir. Procedia Eng 10:900–90510.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.148 ↗

100. Shafiq N, Kumar R, Zahid M, Tufail RF (2019) Effects of modified metakaolin using nano-silica on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Materials (Basel) 12(14):229110.3390/ma12142291 ↗