journal article·2026-07

Multi-domain data integration for a predictive geometallurgy framework applied to MgO control in phosphate beneficiation

Fabrizzio R. Costa, Laura O. Silva, Rafael D. Borges, Bruno P. Milanezi, Dong Yaosong, Cleyton de C. Carneiro, Carina Ulsen

Publisher page

Abstract

The control of magnesium oxide (MgO) content in apatite concentrates is a critical challenge in phosphate processing plants hosted in carbonatite deposits, as elevated MgO levels degrade concentrate quality and impair downstream fertilizer production. This study presents a data-driven geometallurgical framework to forecast MgO content in the final concentrate by integrating geological, chemical, metallurgical, and operational variables through machine learning. A comprehensive dataset from 258 phosphate ore stockpiles was compiled, encompassing lithological proportions, head-sample chemistry, grinding parameters, and plant performance data. Among five regression algorithms evaluated, Support Vector Regression (SVR) demonstrated the most robust performance under Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV), achieving a satisfactory R2 of 0.69 and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of approximately 13%. Model stability and uncertainty were rigorously assessed using bootstrap confidence intervals and k-fold validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret the underlying logic of the model, identifying plant feed MgO, micaceous lithologies, and Al-/Fe-bearing phases as the primary controls on MgO deportment. To bridge the gap between complex modeling and industrial routine, a simplified linear surrogate equation was derived and validated against an independent external dataset. The proposed framework provides a transparent, operationally relevant tool for stockpile management and blending strategies, enabling proactive quality control in phosphate beneficiation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Towards an integrated geometallurgical approach: critical review of current practices and future trends10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106072 ↗
2. Applied machine learning for geometallurgical throughput prediction. A case study using production data at the tropicana gold mining complex10.3390/min11111257 ↗
3. Application of machine learning techniques in mineral classification for scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) images10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108178 ↗
4. Evaluation and comparison of different machine-learning methods to integrate sparse process data into a spatial model in geometallurgy10.1016/j.mineng.2019.01.032 ↗
5. Machine learning applications in minerals processing: a review10.1016/j.mineng.2018.12.004 ↗
6. Modeling industrial hydrocyclone operational variables by SHAP-CatBoost. A “conscious lab” approach
7. Explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using shapley additive explanations10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115736 ↗
8. Cone beam X-ray microtomography for 3D liberation analysis10.1016/0301-7516(96)00005-1 ↗
9. Mineral liberation by 3D X-ray microtomography and SEM-based image analysis in low-grade iron ores10.1016/j.mineng.2024.109150 ↗
10. Using quantitative electron microscopy for process mineralogy applications10.1007/s11837-000-0126-9 ↗
11. Automated scanning electron microscope based mineral liberation analysis
12. The value of automated mineralogy10.1016/j.mineng.2014.01.020 ↗
13. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1 ↗
14. PCA and PLS with very large data sets10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.027 ↗
15. Rock hardness and copper recovery prediction using textural clustering10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108005 ↗
16. Evaluation of logistic regression and SVM for XRF-based particle sorting10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108003 ↗
17. Predicting gold accessibility from mineralogical characterization using machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.139 ↗
18. Enhanced gold ore classification: a comparative analysis of machine learning techniques with textural and chemical data10.3390/geosciences15070248 ↗
19. Efficient magnesium removal by reverse flotation of apatite using cyclic modified fatty acid soaps: experiment and DFT calculation10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109804 ↗
20. What teachers should know about the bootstrap10.1080/00031305.2015.1089789 ↗
21. Data structures for statistical computing in python10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a ↗
22. Array programming with NumPy10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
23. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
24. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
25. Seaborn: statistical data visualization10.21105/joss.03021 ↗
26. Fenites associated with carbonatite complexes: a review10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.12.003 ↗
27. The Late Cretaceous impact of the trindade mantle plume: evidence from large-volume mafic potassic magmatism in SE Brazil10.1093/petrology/36.1.189 ↗
28. Petrology of kamafugites and kimberlites from the alto paranaíba alkaline province, Minas Gerais, Brazil10.1007/s004100100280 ↗
29. Weathering alteration and related REE concentration in the catalão I carbonatite complex, central Brazil10.1016/S0895-9811(98)00024-8 ↗