A bulk-surface continuum model for voltage propagation in dielectric materials

1. R.F. Harrington, Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields, 2nd ed. (Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001), p.6510.1109/9780470546710 ↗

2. W.J. Padilla, R.D. Averitt, Imaging with metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 85–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00394-310.1038/s42254-021-00394-3 ↗

3. S. Shrinnoush, F. Ahmadi, M. Saadat, Transmitting energy in a simple electric circuit. Eur. J. Phys. 39, 055201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aac6f810.1088/1361-6404/aac6f8 ↗

4. G. Antonini, A.E. Ruehli, D. Romano, F. Loreto, The partial elements equivalent circuit method: the state of the art. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 99, 1–20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2023.330270010.1109/TEMC.2023.3302700 ↗

5. P. Liu et al., Superior carrier tuning in ultrathin superconducting materials by electric-field gating. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 336–352 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00438-210.1038/s42254-022-00438-2 ↗

6. M. Borsch, M. Meierhofer, R. Huber, M. Kira, Lightwave electronics in condensed matter. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 668–687 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00592-810.1038/s41578-023-00592-8 ↗

7. P. Liu et al., Quantum geometry in condensed matter. Natl. Sci. Rev. 12, nwae334 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae33410.1093/nsr/nwae334 ↗

8. A. Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012), p.27810.1017/CBO9781139034777 ↗

9. G. Lei, Y. Guo, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Data-driven methods for design and analysis of electromagnetic devices. Appl. Sci. 13, 11674 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13211167410.3390/app132111674 ↗

10. D.M. Knauss et al., Electric fields in polymeric systems. Chem. Rev. 124, 13331–13369 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0049010.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00490 ↗

11. D. Stalke, Meaningful structural descriptors from charge density. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 9264–9278 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20110061510.1002/chem.201100615 ↗

12. P. Macchi, Modern charge density studies: the entanglement of experiment and theory. Cryst. Cryst. Rev. 19, 58–101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.4565910.7892/boris.45659 ↗

13. L. Dou, Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Nan, An overview of linear dielectric polymers and their nanocomposites for energy storage. Molecules 26, 6148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2620614810.3390/molecules26206148 ↗

14. D. Zhang, P. Schoenherr, P. Sharma, J. Seidel, Ferroelectric order in van der Waals layered materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 25–40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00484-310.1038/s41578-022-00484-3 ↗

15. A. Duffy, G. Zhang, Electromagnetic design and analysis in electrical power conversion and usage. Energies 16(5), 2203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1605220310.3390/en16052203 ↗

16. P. Vetter, A. Roth, M. Hausser, Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 926–937 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.92610.1152/jn.2001.85.2.926 ↗

17. G. Zhu et al., Effects of morphology constraint on electrophysiological properties of cortical neurons. Sci. Rep. 6, 23086 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2308610.1038/srep23086 ↗

18. K. Tóth, M. Okun, Seventy years later: the legacy of the Hodgkin and Huxley model in computational neuroscience. J. Physiol. 601(15), 3009–3010 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1113/JP28460610.1113/JP284606 ↗

19. M.P.B. de Sousa et al., Thermal effects and ephaptic entrainment in Hodgkin–Huxley model. Sci. Rep. 14, 20075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70655-510.1038/s41598-024-70655-5 ↗

20. M. Sinha, R. Narayanan, Active dendrites and local field potentials: biophysical mechanisms and computational explorations. Neuroscience 489, 111–142 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.03510.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.035 ↗

21. B.A. Bicknell, M. Häusser, A Synaptic learning rule for exploiting nonlinear dendritic computation. Neuron 109, 4001-4017.e10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.04410.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.044 ↗

22. J.J. Moore, V. Robert, S.K. Rashid, J. Basu, Assessing local and branch-specific activity in dendrites. Neuroscience 489, 143–164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.02210.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.022 ↗

23. C. Kelley, S. Dura-Bernal, S.A. Neymotin, S.D. Antic, N.T. Carnevale, M. Migliore, W.W. Lytton, Effects of Ih and TASK-like shunting current on dendritic impedance in Layer 5 pyramidal-tract neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 125, 1461–1478 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00015.202110.1152/jn.00015.2021 ↗

24. I.S. Jones, K.P. Kording, Do biological constraints impair dendritic computation? Neuroscience 489, 262–274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.07.03610.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.07.036 ↗

25. K.A. Lindsay, J.R. Rosenberg, G. Tucker, From Maxwell’s equations to the cable equation and beyond. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85(1), 71–116 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.08.00110.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.08.001 ↗

26. E.J. López-Sánchez, J.M. Romero, Cable equation for general geometry. Phys. Rev. E 95, 022403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.02240310.1103/PhysRevE.95.022403 ↗

27. C. Bedárd, A. Destexhe, Generalized cable theory for neurons in complex and heterogeneous media. Phys. Rev. E 88, 022709 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.02270910.1103/PhysRevE.88.022709 ↗

28. J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57–82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-02102910.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029 ↗

29. Z. Wu, H. Xu, J. Zhou, Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, Q. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 32(2), 913–922 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2024.344676810.1109/TDEI.2024.3446768 ↗

30. C. Li et al., Surface charge migration and dc surface flashover of surface-modified epoxy-based insulators. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50(6), 065301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa520710.1088/1361-6463/aa5207 ↗

31. P.H.F. Morshuis, J.J. Smit, Partial discharges at DC voltage: their mechanism, detection and analysis. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 12, 28–340 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2005.143040110.1109/TDEI.2005.1430401 ↗

32. J. Kisała, R. Wojnarowska-Nowak, Y. Bobitski, Layered MoS₂: effective and environment-friendly nanomaterial for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Sci. Rep. 13, 14148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41279-y10.1038/s41598-023-41279-y ↗

33. L. Ojeda et al., A giant enhancement of capacitance in graphene supercapacitors by introducing on their electrodes recycled hydroxyapatite from bovine bone. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 203, 112725 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2025.11272510.1016/j.jpcs.2025.112725 ↗

34. R.A. El-Gendy et al., Metal chalcogenides (CuS or MoS₂)-modified TiO₂ as highly efficient bifunctional photocatalyst nanocomposites for green H2 generation and dye degradation. Sci. Rep. 13, 7994 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34743-210.1038/s41598-023-34743-2 ↗

35. Y. Chen et al., Novel MoS2/BaSO4/zeolite heterostructure composite for the enhanced visible-light photocatalytic degradation of sulfadiazine. NPJ Clean Water 8, 21 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-025-00455-510.1038/s41545-025-00455-5 ↗

36. Y. Sun et al., Flexible, recoverable, and efficient photocatalysts: MoS₂/TiO₂ heterojunctions grown on amorphous carbon-coated carbon textiles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 651, 284–295 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.17710.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.177 ↗

37. M. Dan, J. Li, C. Chen, J. Xiang, Y. Zhong, F. Wu, Z. Wang, Z.-Q. Liu, Y. Zhou, MoS2 and Ti3C2 ensembles into TiO2 for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: dual-bonding interactions and capacitive effect trigger the intrinsic activities. Energy Technol. 10, 2100188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20210018810.1002/ente.202100188 ↗

38. M.T. Pettes, S.-Z. Lin, E.A. Peterson, J.-X. Zhu et al., Quantum anomalies in condensed matter. Adv. Phys. Res. 4, 2400189 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr.20240018910.1002/apxr.202400189 ↗

39. T.H. Lee, Planar Microwave Engineering: a Practical Guide to Theory, Measurement, and Circuits (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p.47

40. A. Charles, M. Sadiku, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2006), pp.387–389

41. L. Callegaro, Electrical Impedance: principles, Measurement, and Applications (CRC Press, 2012), p.4510.1201/b13069 ↗

42. M. Neumann-Spallart, M. Etman, Calculation of impedance spectra by Laplace transformation of voltage transients generated by current-step excitation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 372(2), 33–37 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(93)03265-Q10.1016/0022-0728(93)03265-Q ↗

43. D. Molinero, L. Castañer, Modeling and measuring transient discharge current of microelectromechanical switches after dielectric charging by voltage stress. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 043503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.307557310.1063/1.3075573 ↗

44. J. Bono, C. Clopath, Modeling somatic and dendritic spike mediated plasticity at the single neuron and network level. Nat. Commun. 8, 706 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00740-z10.1038/s41467-017-00740-z ↗

45. Z. Yang, J. Zhang, M.C.W. Kintner-Meyer, X. Lu, D. Choi, J.P. Lemmon, J. Liu, Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem. Rev. 111, 3577–3613 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗

46. L.A. Avakyan, E.V. Paramonova, J. Coutinho, S. Öberg, V.S. Byshov, L.A. Bugaev, Optoelectropnics and defect levels in hydroxyapatite by first-principles. J. Chem. Phys. 148(15), 154706 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.502532910.1063/1.5025329 ↗

47. A.E. Sáez, J.C. Perfetti, I. Rusinek, Prediction of effective diffusivities in porous media using spatially periodic models. Transp. Porous Media 6, 143–157 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0017927710.1007/BF00179277 ↗

48. J.Q. Yin et al., Intelligent photoelectric identification of coal and gangue − a review. Measurement 233(6), 114723 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11472310.1016/j.measurement.2024.114723 ↗

49. T. Shahsavarian, C. Li, M.A. Baferani, J. Ronzello, Y. Cao, X. Wu, D. Zhang, High temperature insulation materials for DC cable insulation – Part II: partial discharge behavior at elevated altitudes. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 28, 231–239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2020.00916610.1109/TDEI.2020.009166 ↗

50. X. Wang, M. Wu, P. Zhao, Dielectric identification method and system design of coal gangue based on frequency shift characteristics. Sci. Rep. 15, 8712 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93401-x10.1038/s41598-025-93401-x ↗

51. G. Yang, S. Zhou, H. Huang, J. Yang, Sensing depth analysis of different permittivity materials based on open-ended coaxial probes at different input powers. IEEE Sens. J. 25(18), 35248–35254 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2025.359124510.1109/JSEN.2025.3591245 ↗

52. A.R.-P. Montblanch, M. Barbone, I. Aharonovich, M. Atatüre, A.C. Ferrari, Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 555–571 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01354-x10.1038/s41565-023-01354-x ↗

53. M.A. Rothermund, S.J. Koehler, V. Vaissier Welborn, Electric fields in polymeric systems. Chem. Rev. 124(23), 13331–13369 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0049010.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00490 ↗

54. Noskov, M.; Lopatin, V.; Cheglokov, A. and Shapovalov, A. Computer simulation of discharge channel propagation in solid dielectric. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference of Solid Dielectrics ICSD’01. (Cat. No. 01CH37117), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 25–29, pp. 465–468 (2001).10.1109/ICSD.2001.955694 ↗

55. S.J. Dodd, A deterministic model for the growth of non-conducting electrical tree structures. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36, 129–141 (2002)10.1088/0022-3727/36/2/309 ↗

56. M. Rivas, L.J. del Valle, E. Armelin, O. Bertran, P. Turon, J. Puiggalí, C. Alemán, Hydroxyapatite with permanente electrical polarization: preparation, characterization and response against inorganic adsorbates. Chem. Phys. Chem. 19(14), 1746–1755 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20180019610.1002/cphc.201800196 ↗

57. L. Yu, G.Z. Chen, Supercapatteries as high-performance electrochemical energy storage devices. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 3, 271–285 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-020-00063-610.1007/s41918-020-00063-6 ↗

58. S. Rani et al., Evolution and recent developments of high-performance electrode material for supercapacitors: a review. J. Energy Storage 44(1), 103366 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.10336610.1016/j.est.2021.103366 ↗

59. Y. Ma, J. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Jia, Recent advances in hierarchical MoS₂/graphene-based materials for supercapacitor applications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 8263–8280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP05685B10.1039/D2CP05685B ↗

60. H. Lv, Q. Pan, Y. Song, X.-X. Liu, T. Liu, A review on nano-/microstructured materials constructed by electrochemical technologies for supercapacitors. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00451-z10.1007/s40820-020-00451-z ↗

61. H. Sabeeh et al., Flake-like MoS2 nano-architecture and its nanocomposite with reduced graphene oxide for hybrid supercapacitors applications. Ceram. Int. 46(13), 21064–21072 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.17910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.179 ↗

62. H. Sabeeh, M. Aadil, S. Zulfiqar, I. Ayeman, I. Shakir, P.O. Agboola, S. Haider, M.F. Warsi, Self-supporting design of NiS/CNTs nanohybrid for advanced electrochemical energy storage applications. J. Cluster Sci. 33(5), 2113–2121 (2022)10.1007/s10876-021-02138-w ↗

63. C.H. Ahn, A. Cavalleri, A. Georges, S. Ismail-Beigi, A.J. Millis, J.M. Triscone, Electric-field control of quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 20, 1462–1468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00989-210.1038/s41563-021-00989-2 ↗

64. V. Bystrov, E. Paramonova, L. Avakyan, J. Coutinho, N. Bulina, Simulation and computer study of structures and physical properties of hydroxyapatite with various defects. Nanomaterials 11(10), 2752 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1110275210.3390/nano11102752 ↗

65. M. Nakamura, A. Nagai, T. Hentunen, J. Salonen, Y. Sekilima, T. Okura, K. Hashimoto, Y. Toda, H. Monma, K. Yamashita, Surface electric fields increase osteoblast adhesion through improved wettability on hydroxyapatite electret. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1, 2181–2189 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/am900341v10.1021/am900341v ↗

66. M. Nakamura, N. Hori, S. Namba, T. Toyama, N. Nishimiya, K. Yamashita, Wettability and surface free energy of polarised ceramic biomaterials. Biomed. Mater. 10, 011001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/1/01100110.1088/1748-6041/10/1/011001 ↗

67. M. Yashima, Y. Yonehara, H. Fujimori, Experimental visualization of chemical bonding and structural disorder in hydroxyapatite through charge and nuclear-density analysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 25077 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp208746y10.1021/jp208746y ↗

68. N. Horiuchi, N. Nakamura, A. Nagai, K. Katayama, K. Yamashita, Proton conduction related electrical dipole and space charge polarization in hydroxyapatite. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 074901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475429810.1063/1.4754298 ↗

69. J.M. Kalogeras, A. Vassilikou-Dova, A. Katerinopoulou, Axially dependent dielectric relaxation response of natural hydroxyapatite single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 406 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.148177610.1063/1.1481776 ↗

70. N. Horiuchi, M. Nakamura, K. Yamashita, Proton conduction related electrical dipole and space charge polarization in hydroxyapatite. J of applied physics. 112, 134–156 (2012)10.1063/1.4754298 ↗

71. C. Wichmann, T. Kuner, Heterogeneity of glutamatergic synapses: cellular mechanisms and network consequences. Physiol. Rev. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00039.202010.1152/physrev.00039.2020 ↗

72. S.F. Bonoli, L.L. Missoni, Y.A. Pérez Sirkin, M.E. Tagliazucchi, Nonohmic ionic conductivity and bulk current rectification in nanoparticle superlattices. J. Phys. Chem. C 128, 10723–10732 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0266110.1021/acs.jpcc.4c02661 ↗

73. A. Leike, Demonstration of the exponential decay law using beer froth. Eur. J. Phys. 23(1), 21–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/23/1/30410.1088/0143-0807/23/1/304 ↗

74. S. Wang, Y. Teng, P. Perdikaris, On the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 384, 113938 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11393810.1016/j.cma.2021.113938 ↗

75. I.E. Jacobs, G. D’Avino et al., Structural and dynamic disorder, not ionic trapping, controls charge transport in highly doped conducting polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 3005–3019 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c1065110.1021/jacs.1c10651 ↗

76. K. Fukumoto et al., Surface terminations control charge transfer from bulk to surface states in topological insulators. Sci. Rep. 14, 10537 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61172-610.1038/s41598-024-61172-6 ↗

77. J.G. Checkelsky, Y.S. Hor, R.J. Cava, N.P. Ong, Bulk band gap and surface state conduction observed in voltage-tuned crystals of the topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 196801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19680110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196801 ↗

78. J.M. Rodríguez‐Serna, R. Albarracín‐Sánchez, Improved deterministic and stochastic models for simulating partial discharges in non‐conducting trees inside solid dielectrics. High Voltage 6, 82–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1049/hve2.1203810.1049/hve2.12038 ↗

79. K.K.H. De Silva, H.-H. Huang, P. Viswanath, R. Joshi, M. Yoshimura, Nanoscale electrical characterization of graphene-based materials by atomic force microscopy. J. Mater. Res. 37, 3319–3339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00758-010.1557/s43578-022-00758-0 ↗

80. W. Zhang, W. Cao, L. Qian, H. Yuan, X. Zhang, Topolectrical space-time circuits. Nat. Commun. 16, 198 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55425-110.1038/s41467-024-55425-1 ↗

81. M. Baharian, J.A. Rashed Mohassel, Leveraging space–time modulation for energy coupling control in electromagnetic coupled transmission lines structures. Sci. Rep. 13, 1930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28925-110.1038/s41598-023-28925-1 ↗

82. J.M. de los Santos-Ramirez, R. Roberts, V.G. Martinez-Gonzalez, V.H. Perez-Gonzalez, On using electric circuit models to analyze electric field distributions in insulator-based electrokinetically driven microfluidic devices. Micromachines 16, 1254 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1611125410.3390/mi16111254 ↗

83. S. Jinno, S. Kitora, H. Toki, M. Abe, The time domain numerical method of three-dimensional conductors including radiation with lumped parameter circuit. Sci. Rep. 11, 4598 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83916-410.1038/s41598-021-83916-4 ↗

84. R. Hiptmair, J. Ostrowski, Electromagnetic port boundary conditions: topological and variational perspective. Int. J. Numer. Model. Electron. Networks Devices Fields 34(3), e2839 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.283910.1002/jnm.2839 ↗

85. H. Sahin, Z.B. Siu, S.M. Rafi-Ul-Islam et al., Impedance responses and size-dependent resonances in topolectrical circuits via the method of images. Phys. Rev. B 107, 245114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.24511410.1103/PhysRevB.107.245114 ↗

86. M. Guo, Y. Jiao, Z. Zheng, B. Zhang, J. Lin, Q. Hong, Online split-phase identification of asymmetric parameters between distribution lines and ground for unbalanced voltage compensation based on power electronics. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 39, 10067–10078 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2024.339621610.1109/TPEL.2024.3396216 ↗