journal article·2026-11-01

Effect of Ion Chelating Agent on the Ion Corrosion Resistance of Concrete Partially Immersed in Different Salt Solutions

Ruiyang Wang, Jianying Yu, Quantao Liu, Ke Zhao, Dongliang Kuang, Xiaobin Han

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Concrete partially immersed in saline solutions suffers double damage from salt crystallization and harmful ion corrosion. The ion chelating agent (ICA) can stimulate the production of crystalline products to repair concrete damage and densify its structure. Based on this, this paper investigates the influence of ICA on the resistance of concrete partially immersed in different salt solutions ( {Na}2{SO}4 solution, NaCl solution, and a composite solution of {Na}2{SO}4 and NaCl) to ionic attack by means of mass loss, dynamic elastic modulus, compressive strength, pore size distribution, and internal micro-morphology of the concrete. The results revealed that the {Na}2{SO}4 solution eroded the concrete structure most seriously, while the ICA could effectively inhibit the destruction of concrete by the salt solution. After 120 days of soaking in {Na}2{SO}4 solution, the mass loss rate and total porosity of concrete with ICA decreased by 23.5% and 13.5%, respectively, while the relative dynamic elastic modulus and compressive strength increased by 8.4% and 25.9%, respectively, in comparison to control concrete. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) analyses proved that, although a large amount of expansive ettringite (AFt) and gypsum formed in the concrete with ICA immersed in {Na}2{SO}4 solution, leading to the damage of the pore structure of the concrete, crystalline products such as calcium silicate and calcium carbonate were still produced at the pores, slowing down the destruction of the concrete structure by the erosive ions.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710061, China (corresponding author).

Wuhan Univ. of Technology

Chang’an Univ.

Lecturer, School of Electric Power, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shanxi Univ., Taiyuan 030006, China.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. ASTM C597. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
2. 10.1080/21650373.2017.141129710.1080/21650373.2017.1411297 ↗
3. Cheng, S., Z. Shui, T. Sun, X. Gao, and C. Guo. 2019. “Effects of sulfate and magnesium ion on the chloride transportation behavior and binding capacity of portland cement mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 204 (Apr): 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.132.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.132 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10240010.1016/j.jobe.2021.102400 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000034810.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000348 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.26310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.263 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.09.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13433310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134333 ↗
10. Liu, C., J. Gao, F. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Chen, and Z. He. 2019. “Coupled effect of relative humidity and temperature on the degradation of cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack.” Constr. Build. Mater. 216 (Aug): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.001.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.001 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000011210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000112 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11356-021-18189-510.1007/s11356-021-18189-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.08010.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.080 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12111910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121119 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.12310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.123 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.014 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000331910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003319 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10467610.1016/j.jobe.2022.104676 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11972710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119727 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12091710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120917 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11759810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117598 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10975410.1016/j.jobe.2024.109754 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13137510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131375 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.10910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.109 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.01410.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.014 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10369510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103695 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.13610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.136 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.11510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.115 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10425610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104256 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.003 ↗
33. 10.1515/rams-2022-004910.1515/rams-2022-0049 ↗
34. Zhang, N., H. Li, D. Peng, and X. Liu. 2016. “Properties evaluation of silica-alumina based concrete: Durability and environmental friendly performance.” Constr. Build. Mater. 115 (Jul): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.043.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.043 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.clay.2010.01.01410.1016/j.clay.2010.01.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.01610.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.016 ↗