Mesoscale Simulation of Chloride Ion Diffusion in Nanosilica-Modified Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Northeast Forestry Univ.
Florida International Univ.
China Construction First Group Corporation Limited
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10006110.1016/j.clema.2022.100061 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.00110.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.001 ↗
3. Chen, X. Y., Q. Zhou, Z. Y. Cheng, and Y. P. Tu. 2022. “Effect of nano-SiO2 on the interface transition zone between old and new mortar of recycled concrete.” Mater. Rep. 36 (Z2): 191–195.
4. Chinese Standard. 2010. Recycled coarse aggregate for concrete. GB/T 25177-2010. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China Standardization Administration of China.
5. Chinese Standard. 2013. Technical specification for test of chloride ion content in concrete. JGJ/T 322-2013. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development.
6. Chinese Standard. 2019. Standard for design of concrete structure durability. GB/T 50476-2019. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development State Administration for Market Regulation.
7. Chinese Standard. 2023. Common portland cement. GB 175-2023. Beijing: State Administration for Market Regulation Standardization Administration of China.
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13424.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13424.x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13870210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138702 ↗
10. 10.3390/cryst1108088710.3390/cryst11080887 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.007 ↗
12. Gao, S., J. Guo, Y. Gong, S. Ban, and A. Liu. 2022. “Study on the penetration and diffusion of chloride ions in interface transition zone of recycled concrete prepared by modified recycled coarse aggregates.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16 (Jun): e01034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01034.
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12478510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124785 ↗
14. 10.1680/jmacr.17.0019410.1680/jmacr.17.00194 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.20910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.209 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.08910.1016/j.aej.2024.05.089 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12959210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129592 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10844310.1016/j.jobe.2024.108443 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.01510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.22410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.224 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10396310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103963 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12254710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122547 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.088 ↗
25. 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90089-R10.1016/0008-8846(93)90089-R ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.017 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1515527610.3390/ma15155276 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12126410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121264 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.21510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.215 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.010 ↗
31. Rao, M., J. Wei, Z. Gao, W. Zhou, Q. Li, and S. Liu. 2016. “Study on strength and microstructure of cement-based materials containing combination mineral admixtures.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016 (1): 7243670. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7243670.
32. 10.1007/s11356-021-18168-w10.1007/s11356-021-18168-w ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11705410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117054 ↗
34. 10.1002/suco.20170009110.1002/suco.201700091 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.041 ↗
36. Wang, H. L., J. J. Wang, X. Y. Sun, and J. Cheng. 2011. “Chloride diffusion characteristics of the new interface transition zone in recycled aggregate concrete.” Adv. Mater. Res. 261 (Jul): 104–110. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.261-263.104.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.261-263.104 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11736610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117366 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.024 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.07310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.073 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12595010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125950 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.008 ↗
42. 10.1007/s40069-015-0123-610.1007/s40069-015-0123-6 ↗
43. 10.1680/macr.12.0018010.1680/macr.12.00180 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12541210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125412 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12062010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120620 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.10347610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103476 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122806 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11029610.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110296 ↗
49. 10.3390/ma1414395710.3390/ma14143957 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13231910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132319 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12910110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129101 ↗