journal article·2026-11-01

Assessment of Mechanical and Durability Characteristics of Bituminous Mixtures with Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Jhama Brick Aggregate: Simplified Approach

Sukanta Karati, Arya Das

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and Jhama brick aggregate (JBA) in asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures, with basalt aggregate (BA) as the primary base material, and developed an equation to adjust the proportions of RAP aggregate and RAP binder for the bituminous mix preparation. RAP was combined with JBA to achieve the required gradation, and the aged binder in RAP was rejuvenated using viscosity-grade bitumen, specifically VG20 and VG30. The aim was to develop a high-performance, sustainable AC mix incorporating the RAP, JBA, and fresh binders. Optimal blending ratios for VG30:RAP binder and VG20:RAP binder were found to be 65∶35 and 55∶45 , respectively, based on penetration and rheological evaluations. The modified RAP mixtures demonstrated notable enhancements in mechanical performance, with Marshall stability increased by 12.45% and 19.07%, respectively, compared with that of the control mix. Incorporating the JBA into the RAP-modified mixes further improved the results with respect to the modified Lottman test, resilient modulus ratio (RMR), indirect tensile strength (ITS) across different temperatures, and resistance to the rutting and fatigue. Life-cycle cost and carbon footprint analyses demonstrated significant cost savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions compared with the control mix. The outcomes highlight the effectiveness of RAP and JBA as cost-efficient, environmentally friendly alternatives for durable and reliable pavement construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Affiliations

Sanaka Educational Trust’s Group of Institutions

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2010. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt. AASHTOT 324-14. Washington DC: AASHTO.
2. AASHTO. 2022. Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO T 283-22. Washington DC: AASHTO.
3. Al-Qadi, I. L., M. A. Elseifi, and S. H. Carpenter. 2010. “Impact of moisture and freeze–thaw cycles on the performance of asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2179 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2179-01.
4. 10.1080/10298436.2022.205797710.1080/10298436.2022.2057977 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000356110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003561 ↗
6. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1761510.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17615 ↗
7. Asphalt Institute. 2014. Asphalt mix design methods. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
8. ASTM. 2004. Indirect tension test for resilient modulus of bituminous mixtures. ASTM D4123. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
9. ASTM. 2010. Standard practice for preparation of bituminous specimens using Marshall apparatus. ASTM D6926-10. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
10. ASTM. 2011. Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures. ASTM D2172-11. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
11. ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. ASTM D4402. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
12. ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator. ASTM D5404. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
13. ASTM. 2022. Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). ASTM D6521-22. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM.
14. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.15310.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.153 ↗
15. Bessa, I. S., V. T. C. Branco, J. B. Soares, and J. A. N. Neto. 2014. “Aggregate shape properties and their influence on the behavior of hot-mix asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (6): 04014212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001181.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000347710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003477 ↗
17. Bidgoli, M. N., M. Bahadori, and M. Sharifipour. 2022. “Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on durability and mechanical properties of cementitious composites.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 34 (7): 04022163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004230.
18. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1963a. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part I: Particle size and shape. IS 2386-1. New Delhi India: BIS.
19. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1963b. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part 3: Specific gravity density voids absorption and bulking. IS 2386-3. New Delhi India: BIS.
20. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1963c. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part 4: Mechanical properties. IS 2386-4. New Delhi India: BIS.
21. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1978a. Determination of viscosity: Absolute viscosity. Part II. BIS 1206. New Delhi India: BIS.
22. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1978b. Determination of viscosity: Kinematic viscosity. Part III. BIS 1206. New Delhi India: BIS.
23. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2013. Paving bitumen-specification (second revision). BIS 73. New Delhi India: BIS.
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000073010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000730 ↗
25. 10.1186/s43088-022-00302-310.1186/s43088-022-00302-3 ↗
26. Das, K., and P. Ghosh. 2018. “Durability of Jhama brick dust concrete in aggressive environments.” Mater. Sustainable Constr. 14 (2): 90–102.
27. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.10.00810.1016/j.ijprt.2017.10.008 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11943510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119435 ↗
29. El-Hmrawey, S., and A. I. Elmohr. 2015. “Durability of hot asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavements.” Open Access Library J. 2 (5): 580–582. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101508.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000223910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002239 ↗
31. Hailesilassie, B. W., M. Hugener, and M. N. Partl. 2006. “Influence of foaming water content on foam asphalt mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 85 (Jun): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.071.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.071 ↗
32. 10.1139/cjce-2023-012210.1139/cjce-2023-0122 ↗
33. 10.3390/app12241284110.3390/app122412841 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000022310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000223 ↗
35. Huang, C. W., T. H. Yang, and G. B. Lin. 2020. “The evaluation of short- and long-term performance of cold-mix asphalt patching materials.” J. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 220 (Mar): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8968951.
36. IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2009. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. IRC SP-30. New Delhi India: IRC.
37. IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. IRC: 37. New Delhi India: IRC.
38. Islam M. R. M. I. Hossain S. Hossain F. A. Faisal M. Hasan and S. M. Rahman. 2019. “Potential of RAP as aggregate base and subbase in the context of Bangladesh.” In Proc. Int. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conf. 136–143. Reston VA: ASCE.10.1061/9780784482469.014 ↗
39. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1747810.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17478 ↗
40. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159022310.1080/14680629.2019.1590223 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000412010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004120 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.26510.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.265 ↗
43. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1676910.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16769 ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(81)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(81) ↗
45. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000279010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002790 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000465910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004659 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(777)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(777) ↗
48. MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2013. Specifications for road and bridge works. 5th ed. New Delhi, India: Government of India.
49. 10.3923/jas.2007.3870.387910.3923/jas.2007.3870.3879 ↗
50. Patil, G. S., and P. B. Autade. 2015. “Effect of partial replacement of coarse aggregate by Jhama class brick in concrete.” Int. J. Eng. Res. and General Sci. 3 (4): 226–233.
51. Petersen, J. C. 2009. “A review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation: Chemical, physicochemical, physical property, and durability relationships.” In Transportation Research Circle E-C140. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000348010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003480 ↗
53. 10.3390/technologies601002010.3390/technologies6010020 ↗
54. Raj, A., and J. M. Krishnan. 2019. “Influence of gauge length on the measurement of resilient modulus of bituminous mixtures.” SN Appl. Sci. 1 (118): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0087-7.
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000137410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001374 ↗
56. Sarkar, D., M. Pal, A. K. Sarkar, and U. Mishra. 2016. “Evaluation of the properties of bituminous concrete prepared from brick-stone mix aggregate.” Hindawi Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016 (1): 2761038. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2761038.
57. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1776010.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17760 ↗
58. Suresh, M., and M. Pal. 2019. “Effect of centrifuged latex on moisture damage of hot-mix asphalt with brick aggregate.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 174 (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.19.00095.
59. 10.11648/j.ajce.20150303.1610.11648/j.ajce.20150303.16 ↗
60. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000024510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000245 ↗
61. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000009310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000093 ↗
62. Takle, A., P. Kawade, S. Mhasade, A. Bahikar, and S. Kathalkar. 2022. “Analysis on partial replacement of coarse aggregate by Jhama brick in concrete.” J. Emerging Technol. Innovative Res. 9 (5): 165–172.
63. 10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/01206510.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012065 ↗
64. Wanjule, P. B., S. B. Chandanshiv, and S. Aswale. 2015. “Brick making in India—History.” Int. J. Marketing Financ. Serv. Manage. Res. 4 (11): 11–16.
65. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475) ↗
66. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.10510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.105 ↗
67. 10.3390/app1009332410.3390/app10093324 ↗