Milling Performance of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718: Cutting Parameters Effect on Tool Wear, Surface Quality, Chip Morphology, and Microstructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Zahoor, F. Ameen, W. Abdul-Kader, and J. Stagner, Environmentally Conscious Machining of Inconel 718: Surface Roughness, Tool Wear, and Material Removal Rate Assessment, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 106, p 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04550-z10.1007/s00170-019-04550-z ↗
2. N. Khanna, P. Shah, C. Agrawal et al., Inconel 718 Machining Performance Evaluation Using Indigenously Developed Hybrid Machining Facilities: Experimental Investigation and Sustainability Assessment, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 106, p 4987–4999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04921-x10.1007/s00170-020-04921-x ↗
3. T. Jadam, S. Datta, and M. Masanta, Influence of Cutting Tool Material on Machinability of Inconel 718 Superalloy, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2021, 25, p 349–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2020.181504710.1080/10910344.2020.1815047 ↗
4. C. Pérez-Salinas, L.N.L. de Lacalle, A. del Olmo, and C.S. Kumar, The Relationship Between the Cutting-Edge, Tool Wear, and Chip Formation during Inconel 718 Dry Cutting, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2024, 132, p 6001–6017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13685-710.1007/s00170-024-13685-7 ↗
5. B. Kurs, Optimization of Cutting Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Milling Inconel 718 Superalloy Using Borax-Added Nanofluid in (MQL) System, Indus. Lubr. Tribol., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-05-2024-0191/Keywords10.1108/ILT-05-2024-0191/Keywords ↗
6. L. Sun, S. Shi, X. Li et al., Surface Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Property Investigation of Inconel 718 Alloy Using Multiple Trimmings and WEDM, Exp. Tech., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00749-210.1007/s40799-024-00749-2 ↗
7. A.S. Rao, Effect of Nose Radius on the Chip Morphology, Cutting Force and Tool Wear during Dry Turning of Inconel 718, Tribol. Mater. Surf. Interfaces, 2023, 17, p 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2022.216016110.1080/17515831.2022.2160161 ↗
8. U. Alonso, F. Veiga, A. Suárez, and T. Artaza, Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing on the Machinability of Titanium Parts, Metals, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3390/met1001002410.3390/met10010024 ↗
9. J. Dang, X. Cai, D. Yu et al., Effect of Material Microstructure on Tool Wear Behavior during Machining Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2020, 20, p 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-019-0007-710.1007/s43452-019-0007-7 ↗
10. K. Mahesh, J.T. Philip, S.N. Joshi, and B. Kuriachen, Machinability of Inconel 718: A Critical Review on the Impact of Cutting Temperatures, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2021, 36, p 753–791.10.1080/10426914.2020.1843671 ↗
11. Z. Liu, X. Li, X. Wang et al., Comparative Investigation on Grindability of Inconel 718 Made by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) and Casting, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 100, p 3155–3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2850-810.1007/s00170-018-2850-8 ↗
12. Z. Zou, L. He, H. Jiang et al., Influence of Microgroove Structure on Cutting Performance and Chip Morphology during the Turning of Superalloy Inconel 718, Materials, 2021, 14, p 4142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1415414210.3390/ma14154142 ↗
13. Y. Zhao, J. Sun, and J. Li, Study on Chip Morphology and Milling Characteristics of Laser Cladding Layer, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 77, p 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6483-210.1007/s00170-014-6483-2 ↗
14. M.W.H. Hamıd, B. Özlü, H.B. Ulaş, and H. Demir, Prediction of Cutting Parameters and Reduction of Output Parameters Using Machine Learning in Milling of Inconel 718 Alloy, Sci. Rep., 2025, 15, p 33309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04198-810.1038/s41598-025-04198-8 ↗
15. D. Przestacki, T. Chwalczuk, and S. Wojciechowski, The Study on Minimum Uncut Chip Thickness and Cutting Forces during Laser-Assisted Turning of WC/NiCr Clad Layers, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 91, p 3887–3898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0035-510.1007/s00170-017-0035-5 ↗
16. W. Ming, J. Chen, Q. An, and M. Chen, Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Machinability Characteristics of Selective Laser Melted and Forged Ti6Al4V, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 271, p 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.015 ↗
17. P. Fernández-Lucio, O. Pereira Neto, G. Gómez-Escudero et al., Roughing Milling with Ceramic Tools in Comparison with Sintered Carbide on Nickel-Based Alloys, Coatings, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10.3390/coatings ↗
18. R. Zimmermann, D. Welling, T. Venek, et al (2020) Tool Wear Progression of SiAlON Ceramic End Mills in Five-Axis High-Feed Rough Machining of an Inconel 718 BLISK. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 13–1610.1016/j.procir.2021.02.003 ↗
19. E. Gadalińska, P. Żuk, and M. Bujak, X-ray Diffraction Measurements for Inconel 718 Alloy Elements Created by Incremental Methods, Fatigue Aircr. Struct., 2023, 2023, p 58–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2023-000510.2478/fas-2023-0005 ↗
20. T.R.F. Cavalcante, F.E. Mariani, and J.A.A. Diaz, Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718: A Review on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of DED-LB-Processed Samples, J. Mater. Res., 2025 https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-025-01663-y10.1557/s43578-025-01663-y ↗
21. C. Gullipalli, N. Thawari, P. Burad, and T.V.K. Gupta, Residual Stresses and Distortions in Additive Manufactured Inconel 718, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2023, 38, p 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2023.216566310.1080/10426914.2023.2165663 ↗