Influence of Cell Geometry and Orientation on the Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Onyx Cellular Topologies

1. C.M. González-Henríquez, M.A. Sarabia-Vallejos, and J. Rodriguez-Hernandez, Polymers for Additive Manufacturing and 4d-Printing: Materials, Methodologies, and Biomedical Applications, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2019, 94, p 57–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001 ↗

2. A. Al Rashid, S.A. Khan, S.G. Al-Ghamdi, and M. Koc, Additive Manufacturing of Polymer Nanocomposites: Needs and Challenges in Materials, Processes, and Applications, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 14, p 910–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Jmrt.2021.07.01610.1016/J.Jmrt.2021.07.016 ↗

3. B.A. Yilmaz, A. Ai Rashid, Y. Ait, Z. Evis, and M. Koç, Bioprinting: A Review Of Processes Materials and Applications, Bioprinting, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Bprint.2021.E0014810.1016/J.Bprint.2021.E00148 ↗

4. R. Pipalla, J. Schuster, and Y.P. Shaik, Experimental Analysis on 3d Printed Onyx Specimens with Honeycomb Infill Structure, J. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 1(1), p 1–10.10.33425/2771-666X.1003 ↗

5. H.K. Yap, H.Y. Ng, and C.H. Yeow, High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications, Soft Robot., 2016, 3, p 144–158.10.1089/soro.2016.0030 ↗

6. S. Dul, L. Fambri, and A. Pegoretti, High-Performance Polyamide/Carbon Fiber Composites for Fused Filament Fabrication: Mechanical and Functional Performances, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 5066–5085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05635-110.1007/s11665-021-05635-1 ↗

7. A. Wojcieszynski, Special Issue Focus: Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(2), p 593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-3857-510.1007/s11665-019-3857-5 ↗

8. S.F. Khosroshahi, S.A. Tsampas, and U. Galvanetto, Feasibility Study on the Use of a Hierarchical Lattice Architecture for Helmet Liners, Mater. Today Commun., 2018, 14, p 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.02.00210.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.02.002 ↗

9. N. San Ha and G. Lu, A Review of Recent Research on Bio Inspired Structures and Materials for Energy Absorption Applications, Compos. Part B Engg., 2020, 181, p 107496.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496 ↗

10. R. Lakes, Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson’s Ratio, Science, 1987, 235, p 1038–1040.10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗

11. W. Yang, Z.M. Li, W. Shi, B.H. Xie, and M.B. Yang, Review on Auxetic Materials, J. Mater. Sci., 2004, 39(10), p 3269–3279.10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e0 ↗

12. Y. Liu and H. Hu, A Review on Auxetic Structures and Polymeric Materials, Sci. Res., 2010, 5, p 1052–1063.

13. O. Paper, Additive Manufacturing: Expanding 3D Printing Horizon in Industry, 2221–2235 (2023)10.1007/s12008-022-00956-4 ↗

14. R. Huang et al., Energy and Emissions Saving Potential of Additive Manufacturing: The Case of Lightweight Aircraft Components, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 135, p 1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.10910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109 ↗

15. nTopology, Guide to Lattice Structures in Additive Manufacturing, ntopology, pp. 1–14, (2022)

16. H.K. Dave, B.H. Patel, S.R. Rajpurohit, A.R. Prajapati, and D. Nedelcu, Effect of Multi-infill Patterns on Tensile Behavior of FDM Printed Parts, J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Engg., 2021, 43, p 1–15.

17. O. Mohamed, S. Masood, and J. Bhowmik, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters: A Review of Current Research and Future Prospects, Adv. Manuf., 2015, 3(1), p 42–53.10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗

18. M. Waseem, B. Salah, T. Habib, W. Saleem, M. Abas, R. Khan, U. Ghani, and M.U.R. Siddiqi, Multi-Response Optimization of Tensile Creep Behavior of PLA 3D Printed Parts using Categorical Response Surface Methodology, Polymers, 2020, 12(12), p 2962. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1212296210.3390/polym12122962 ↗

19. S. Vyavahare, S. Teraiya, D. Panghal, and S. Kumar, Fused Deposition Modelling: A Review, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2020, 26, p 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-010610.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106 ↗

20. S. Vyavahare and S. Kumar, Re-Entrant Auxetic Structures Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling: An Experimental Study of Influence of Process Parameters Under Compressive Loading, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2020, 60, p 3183–3196. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2554610.1002/pen.25546 ↗

21. R.S. Lakes, Cellular Solids, J. Biomech., 1989, 22(4), p 397. https://doi.org/10.1016/00219290(89)90056-010.1016/00219290(89)90056-0 ↗

22. Y.L. Yap, Y.M. Lai, H.F. Zhou, and W.Y. Yeong, Compressive Strength of Thin-Walled Cellular Core by Inkjet-Based Additive Manufacturing, Proc. Int. Conf. Progress. Addit. Manuf., 2014, 10, p 333–338.

23. C. Lu, M. Qi, S. Islam, P. Chen, S. Gao, Y. Xu, and X. Yang, Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printing Plastic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol., 2018, 5, p 47–54.10.1007/s40684-018-0005-x ↗

24. S. Vyavahare and S. Kumar, Numerical and Experimental Investigation of FDM Fabricated Re-Entrant Auxetic Structures of ABS and PLA Materials Under Compressive Loading, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2021, 27, p 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2019-027110.1108/RPJ-10-2019-0271 ↗

25. M. Fernandez-Vicente, W. Calle, S. Ferrandiz, and A. Conejero, Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf., 2016, 3(3), p 183–192.10.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗

26. C. Lubombo and M.A. Huneault, Effect of Infill Patterns on the Mechanical Performance of Lightweight 3D-Printed Cellular PLA Parts, Mater. Today Commun., 2018, 17, p 214–228.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.09.017 ↗

27. Y. Chen and Q. He, 3D-Printed Short Carbon Fibre Reinforced Perforated Structures with Negative Poisson’s Ratios: Mechanisms and Design, Compos. Struct., 2020, 236, p 111859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111859.20.11294610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111859.20.112946 ↗

28. A. Al Rashid, H. Ikram, and M. Koç, Additive Manufacturing and Mechanical Performance of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide-6 Composites, Mater. Today Proc., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.33910.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.339 ↗

29. ASTM D638–14. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa. 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.astm. org/

30. A. Vedrtnam and W. Finnegan, Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Continuous Fibre Onyx Composites for Drone Applications: an Experimental and Numerical Analysis, Compos. Part C Open Access, 2023, 12, p 100418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.10041810.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100418 ↗

31. T. Li, Y. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Li, and L. Wang, Exploiting Negative Poisson’s Ratio to Design 3D-Printed Composites with Enhanced Mechanical Properties, Mater. Des., 2018, 142, p 247–258.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.034 ↗

32. C. Shemelya et al., Anisotropy of Thermal Conductivity in 3D Printed Polymer Matrix Composites for Space Based Cube Satellites, Addit. Manuf., 2017, 16, p 186–196.

33. N. Mohan et al., A Review on Composite Materials and Process Parameters Optimisation for the Fused Deposition Modelling Process, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2017, 12(1), p 47–59.10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 ↗

34. D.A. Turk et al., Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed Polymers for Fiber Reinforced Polymers Processing, Mater. Des., 2017, 118, p 256–265.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.050 ↗

35. F. Sajjad and V. Fariborz, Effect of Printing Parameters on the Tensile Strength of FDM 3D Samples: a Meta-Analysis Focusing on Layer Thickness and Sample Orientation, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2022, 7(4), p 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-02-00247-610.1007/s40964-02-00247-6 ↗

36. S. Prakash, A. Agrawal, R. Singh, R.K. Singh, and D.A. Zindani, Decade of Grey Systems: Theory and Application-Bibliometric Overview and Future Research Directions, Grey Syst. Theory Appl., 2023, 13, p 14–33.10.1108/GS-03-2022-0030 ↗

37. S. Chakraborty and H.N. Datta, Grey Relational Analysis-Based Optimization of Machining Processes: A Comprehensive Review, Process Integr. Optim. Sustain., 2023, 7, p 609–639.10.1007/s41660-023-00311-4 ↗

38. L. Xuemei, Y. Cao, J. Wang, and Y. Dang, A Summary of Grey Forecasting and Relational Models and Its Applications in Marine Economics and Management, Mar. Econ. Manag., 2019, 2, p 87–113.10.1108/MAEM-04-2019-0002 ↗

39. O. Tunçel, K. Tüfekci, and Ç. Kahya, Multi-Objective Optimization of 3D Printing Process Parameters using Grey-Based Taguchi for Composite PLA Parts, Polym. Compos., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2867410.1002/pc.28674 ↗

40. Y.A. Turkkan, M. Aslan, A. Tarkan, Ö. Aslan, C. Yuce, and N. Yavuz, Multi-objective Optimization of Fiber Laser Cutting of Stainless-Steel Plates Using Taguchi-Based Grey Relational Analysis, Metals, 2023, 13, p 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1301013210.3390/met13010132 ↗

41. K. Aslantas, E. Ekici, and A. Çiçek, Optimization of Process Parameters for Micro Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Using Taguchi-Based Grey Relational Analysis, Measurement, 2018, 128, p 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.06610.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.066 ↗

42. M.F. Ashby, The Properties of Foams and Lattices, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A., 2006, 364, p 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗