journal article·2026-07-28

Machine Learning-Based Framework for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth in 2024 T351 Aluminum Alloy with Grain Boundary Effects

Taoufik Nasri, Mohamed Anouar Borgi, Adel Hamdi, Toufik Kanit

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. J.D. Boyd and S. Vaynman, Properties and Applications of 2024 Aluminum Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2001, 10(6), p 681–690.
2. M. Chai, X. Hou, Z. Zhang et al., Identification and Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Under Different Stress Ratios Using Acoustic Emission Data, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 160, 106860.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106860 ↗
3. K. Sadananda, M. Nani Babu, and A.K. Vasudevan, A Review of Fatigue Crack Growth Resistance in the Short Crack Growth Regime, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 754, p 674–701.10.1016/j.msea.2019.03.102 ↗
4. H. Chen, S. Liu et al., Effect of Grain Structure on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of 2024 Aluminum Alloy Under Different Stress Ratios, Mater. Des., 2024, 244, 113117.10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113117 ↗
5. A. Jamali, A. Ma, and J. Llorca, Influence of Grain Size and Grain Boundary Misorientation on the Fatigue Crack Initiation Mechanisms of Textured AZ31 Mg Alloy, Scr. Mater., 2022, 207, 114304.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114304 ↗
6. D. Lu, B. Lin, T. Liu et al., Effect of Grain Structure on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Al-Cu-Li Alloys, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2023, 148, p 75–89.10.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.085 ↗
7. S. Suzuki, M. Sakaguchi, M. Domen et al., Temperature and ΔK Dependence of Grain Boundary Effect on Fatigue Crack Propagation in a Two-Dimensional Polycrystalline Ni-Base Superalloy, Acta Mater., 2022, 240, 118288.10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118288 ↗
8. W. Wu, Z. Liu, S. Bai et al., Anisotropy in Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Al-Cu-Li Alloy Thick Plate, Mater Charact, 2017, 131, p 440–449.10.1016/j.matchar.2017.07.025 ↗
9. W.B. Shou, D.Q. Yi, H.Q. Liu et al., Effect of Grain Size on the Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of 2524–T3 Aluminum Alloy, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2016, 16(3), p 304–312.10.1016/j.acme.2016.01.004 ↗
10. M. Li, Y. Shi, Q. Pan et al., Low Anisotropy of Fatigue Crack Growth in Al-5.8Mg- 0.25Sc, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 125, p 170–178.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.003 ↗
11. P. Paris and F. Erdogan, A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws, J. Basic Eng., 1963, 85(4), p 528–534.10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
12. J. Zhang and C. Sachs, Effects of Microstructural Features on Crack Propagation in High-Strength Aluminum Alloys, Acta Mater., 2007, 55(5), p 1597–1607.10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.044 ↗
13. J. Horňas et al., Modelling Fatigue Life Prediction of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al4V Samples Using Machine Learning Approach, Int. J. Fatigue, 2023, 169, p 107483.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107483 ↗
14. E. Maleki, S. Bagherifard, N. Razavi, M. Bandini, A. du Plessis, F. Berto et al., On the Efficiency of Machine Learning for Fatigue Assessment of Post-Processed Additively Manufactured AlSi10Mg, Int. J. Fatigue, 2022, 160, 106841.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106841 ↗
15. T. Nasri, M.A. Borgi, and A. Hamdi, in FaDeep: fatigue life prediction of an aluminum alloy 2024 T351 using machine learning. Advances in integrated design and production III, proceedings of the 13th international conference on integrated design and production, CPI 2024 (Monastir, Tunisia, 2024), pp. 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04742-7_50.10.1007/978-3-032-04742-7_50 ↗
16. A. Bezazi, S.G. Pierce, K. Worden, and E.H. Harkati, Fatigue Life Prediction of Sandwich Composite Materials Under Flexural Tests Using a Bayesian Trained Artificial Neural Network, Int. J. Fatigue, 2007, 29(4), p 738–747.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.013 ↗
17. I. Ben-Yelun et al., Self-Learning Locally Optimal Hypertuning Using Maximum Entropy, and Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Estimating Fatigue Life in Composite Materials of the Aerospace Industry, Eng. Struct., 2023, 283, 115829.10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115829 ↗
18. L. Susmel, Estimating Notch Fatigue Limits via a Machine Learning-Based Approach Structured According to the Classic Kf Formulas, Int. J. Fatigue, 2024, 179, p 108029.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108029 ↗
19. H. Wang, B. Li, J. Gong, and F.Z. Xuan, Machine Learning-Based Fatigue Life Prediction of Metal Materials: Perspectives of Physics-Informed and Data-Driven Hybrid Methods, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2023, 284, p 109242.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109242 ↗
20. H. Béji, T. Kanit, and T. Messager, Prediction of Effective Elastic and Thermal Properties of Heterogeneous Materials Using Convolutional Neural Networks, Appl. Mech., 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech401001610.3390/applmech4010016 ↗
21. M.F. Ashby and D.R.H. Jones, Engineering Materials 1: An Introduction to Properties, Applications and Design, 5th edn., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2019.
22. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams, Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors, Nature, 1986, 323(6088), p 533–536.10.1038/323533a0 ↗
23. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep Learning, Nature, 2015, 521, p 436–444.10.1038/nature14539 ↗
24. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, in XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016)10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
25. S. Chen and T. Guestrin, XGBoost: A Scalable Machine Learning Library for Tree Boosting, arXiv preprint arXiv 1603, 02754 (2016)
26. W. Lee, S. Dharmadhikari, and A. Basak, A Random Forest-Based Fatigue Damage Classification Framework using Global Loading and Displacement Information, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1405710.1111/ffe.14057 ↗
27. M. Nakai and T. Eto, New Aspects of Development of High Strength Aluminum Alloys for Aerospace Applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 285, p 62–68.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00667-5 ↗
28. D. Sigler, M.C. Montpetit, and W.L. Haworth, Metallography of Fatigue Crack Initiation in an Overaged High-Strength Aluminum Alloy, Metall. Trans. A, 1983, 14, p 931–938.10.1007/BF02644299 ↗
29. B. Santos, V. Infante, T. Barros, and R. Baptista, Study of Fatigue Crack Propagation on Modified CT Specimens Under Variable Amplitude Loadings Using Machine Learning, Int. J. Fatigue, 2024, 184, 108332.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108332 ↗
30. D.V. Srinivasan, M. Moradi, P. Komninos, D. Zarouchas, and A.P. Vassilopoulos, A Generalized Machine Learning Framework to Estimate Fatigue Life Across Materials with Minimal Data, Mater. Des., 2024, 246, p 113355.10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113355 ↗
31. J. Yu, S.H. Lee, S. Cheon, S.H. Park, and T. Lee, Alternative Predictive Approach for Low-Cycle Fatigue Life Based on Machine Learning and Energy-Based Modeling, J. Magnes. Alloys, 2024, 12(10), p 4075–4084.10.1016/j.jma.2024.10.014 ↗