Interpretable and Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning for Shear Strength Prediction of FRCM-Strengthened RC Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accurate prediction of the shear capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems remains challenging due to the complex interaction between geometry, internal reinforcement, and parameters related to the strengthening technique. This study proposes an interpretable and uncertainty-aware machine-learning framework for estimating the shear capacity of FRCM-strengthened beams. A database comprising 174 experimental beam tests collected from the literature was assembled and, to enrich the training space under limited experimental coverage, a hybrid tabular variational autoencoder (TVAE) framework was used to generate 6,000 synthetic samples from the training subset. The resulting experimental and augmented data sets were used to develop three machine-learning models: linear regression, support vector regression, and extreme gradient boosting. An existing analytical model was also evaluated for comparison. Among all approaches, the extreme gradient boosting model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with R 2 = 0.911 on the testing set and R 2 = 0.949 for the complete data set, and also exhibited stable performance on the synthetic data set. Model interpretability was examined using shapley additive explanations (SHAP)-based explanations together with permutation-based importance analysis, which consistently identified effective depth as the most influential variable, followed by transverse-reinforcement ratio and shear span-to-depth ratio. To quantify feature-importance uncertainty, a fuzzy ensemble feature importance analysis was conducted. Effective depth exhibited the most stable importance pattern, whereas several FRCM-related parameters showed moderate importance with greater uncertainty. Introducing model-form uncertainty through a multimodel ensemble reduced the relative importance of several predictors. Contextual fuzzy rules further revealed distinct feature-state patterns associated with low, moderate, and high shear-capacity regimes. To improve practical applicability, the validated extreme gradient boosting model was further distilled into an explicit two-regime design-oriented formula with preliminary reliability calibration. Overall, integrating machine-learning prediction with fuzzy ensemble interpretability and TVAE-assisted design-oriented distillation enables accurate, transparent, and uncertainty-aware assessment of shear capacity in FRCM-strengthened concrete beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ. of Sydney
Univ. of Nottingham
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Abuodeh, O. R., J. A. Abdalla, and R. A. Hawileh. 2020. “Prediction of shear strength and behavior of RC beams strengthened with externally bonded FRP sheets using machine learning techniques.” Compos. Struct. 234: 111698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111698.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111698 ↗
2. Aguilar-Bejarano E. 2025. “Helix 1.0: An open-source framework for reproducible and interpretable machine learning on tabular scientific data.” Preprint arXiv:2507.17791.10.1016/j.patter.2026.101536 ↗
3. Altmann, A., L. Toloşi, O. Sander, and T. Lengauer. 2010. “Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure.” Bioinformatics 26 (10): 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134.10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
4. Behmanesh, I., and B. Moaveni. 2016. “Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification.” J. Sound Vib. 374: 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022.10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022 ↗
5. Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
6. CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992-1-1 (Eurocode 2). Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
7. Chen, H., W. J. Yi, and Z. J. Ma. 2019. “Shear size effect in simply supported RC deep beams.” Eng. Struct. 182: 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.062.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.062 ↗
8. Chouldechova, A. 2017. “Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments.” Big Data 5 (2): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0047.10.1089/big.2016.0047 ↗
9. Dong, W., Y. Huang, B. Lehane, and G. Ma. 2020. “XGBoost algorithm-based prediction of concrete electrical resistivity for structural health monitoring.” Autom. Constr. 114: 103155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103155.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103155 ↗
10. Escrig, C., L. Gil, E. Bernat-Maso, and F. Puigvert. 2015. “Experimental and analytical study of reinforced concrete beams shear strengthened with different types of textile-reinforced mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 83: 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.013.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.013 ↗
11. Gonzalez-Libreros, J. H., C. Sabau, L. H. Sneed, C. Pellegrino, and G. Sas. 2017. “State of research on shear strengthening of RC beams with FRCM composites.” Constr. Build. Mater. 149: 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.128.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.128 ↗
12. Guo, B., X. Lin, Y. Wu, and L. Zhang. 2023. “Machine learning-driven evaluation and optimisation of compression yielded FRP-reinforced concrete beam with T section.” Eng. Struct. 275: 115240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115240.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115240 ↗
13. Kingma D. P. and M. Welling. 2013. “Auto-encoding variational Bayes.” Preprint arXiv:1312.6114.
14. Lea D. 2025. “helix-ai 1.0.1.” PyPI (Python Package Index). Accessed December 23 2025. https://pypi.org/project/helix-ai/.
15. Li, Z., X. Liu, D. Kou, Y. Hu, Q. Zhang, and Q. Yuan. 2023. “Probabilistic models for the shear strength of RC deep beams.” Appl. Sci. 13 (8): 4853. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084853.10.3390/app13084853 ↗
16. Liang, H., and W. Song. 2009. “Improved estimation in multiple linear regression models with measurement error and general constraint.” J. Multivar. Anal. 100 (4): 726–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2008.08.003.10.1016/j.jmva.2008.08.003 ↗
17. Lipton, Z. C. 2018. “The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery.” Queue 16 (3): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236386.3241340.10.1145/3236386.3241340 ↗
18. Liu, X., G. P. Figueredo, G. S. Gordon, and G. E. Thermou. 2025. “Data-driven shear strength prediction of RC beams strengthened with FRCM jackets using machine learning approach.” Eng. Struct. 325: 119485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119485.10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119485 ↗
19. Liu, X., and G. E. Thermou. 2023. “A review on the shear performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with externally bonded mortar-based composites.” Structures 58: 105474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105474.10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105474 ↗
20. Liu, X., and G. E. Thermou. 2025. “Effectiveness of SRG in shear strengthening of deep and slender concrete beams.” Structures 71: 108197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108197.10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108197 ↗
21. Lundberg S. M. and S.-I. Lee. 2017. “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions.” In Advances in neural information processing systems edited by I. Guyon U. von Luxburg S. Bengio H. Wallach R. Fergus S. Vishwanathan and R. Garnett 4765–4774. Red Hook NY: Curran Associates Inc.
22. Mamdani, E. H., and S. Assilian. 1975. “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2 ↗
23. Marani, A., and M. L. Nehdi. 2022. “Predicting shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete beams using novel synthetic data driven deep learning.” Eng. Struct. 257: 114083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114083.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114083 ↗
24. Massey, F. J., Jr. 1951. “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46 (253): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769.10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769 ↗
25. Mohammadi, A., J. A. Barros, and J. Sena-Cruz. 2025. “An interpretable machine learning-based model for shear resistance prediction of CFRP-strengthened RC beams using experimental and synthetic dataset.” Compos. Struct. 351: 118632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118632.10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118632 ↗
26. Ponsi, F., E. Bassoli, N. Buratti, and L. Vincenzi. 2024. “Parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification of a fiber-reinforced concrete model by means of a multi-level Bayesian approach.” Constr. Build. Mater. 438: 136994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136994.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136994 ↗
27. Rengasamy, D., J. M. Mase, A. Kumar, B. Rothwell, M. T. Torres, M. R. Alexander, D. A. Winkler, and G. P. Figueredo. 2022. “Feature importance in machine learning models: A fuzzy information fusion approach.” Neurocomputing 511: 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.053.10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.053 ↗
28. Rengasamy, D., B. C. Rothwell, and G. P. Figueredo. 2021. “Towards a more reliable interpretation of machine learning outputs for safety-critical systems using feature importance fusion.” Appl. Sci. 11 (24): 11854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411854.10.3390/app112411854 ↗
29. Simoen, E., G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert. 2015. “Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 56: 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001.10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001 ↗
30. Song, M., I. Behmanesh, B. Moaveni, and C. Papadimitriou. 2020. “Accounting for modeling errors and inherent structural variability through a hierarchical Bayesian model updating approach: An overview.” Sensors 20 (14): 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143874.10.3390/s20143874 ↗
31. Syroka-Korol, E., and J. Tejchman. 2014. “Experimental investigations of size effect in reinforced concrete beams failing by shear.” Eng. Struct. 58: 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.012.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.012 ↗
32. Tetta, Z. C., L. N. Koutas, and D. A. Bournas. 2015. “Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of concrete beams.” Composites, Part B 77: 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.055.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.055 ↗
33. Thermou, G. E., and S. J. Pantazopoulou. 2011. “Assessment indices for the seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (3): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1028.10.1002/eqe.1028 ↗
34. Thermou, G. E., V. Papanikolaou, C. Lioupis, and I. Hajirasouliha. 2019. “Steel-reinforced grout (SRG) strengthening of shear-critical RC beams.” Constr. Build. Mater. 216: 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.259.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.259 ↗
35. Thermou, G. E., and M. Psaltakis. 2018. “Retrofit design methodology for substandard RC buildings with torsional sensitivity.” J. Earthquake Eng. 22 (7): 1233–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1277569.10.1080/13632469.2016.1277569 ↗
36. Tipu, R. K., V. Batra, K. Pandya, and V. Panchal. 2023. “Shear capacity prediction for FRCM-strengthened RC beams using hybrid ReLU-activated BPNN model.” Structures 58: 105432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105432.10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105432 ↗
37. Triantafillou, T. C., and C. P. Antonopoulos. 2000. “Design of concrete flexural members strengthened in shear with FRP.” J. Compos. Constr. 4 (4): 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:4(198).10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:4(198) ↗
38. Wakjira, T. G., and U. Ebead. 2019. “Internal transverse reinforcement configuration effect of EB/NSE-FRCM shear strengthening of RC deep beams.” Composites, Part B 166: 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.004.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.004 ↗
39. Wakjira, T. G., M. Ibrahim, U. Ebead, and M. S. Alam. 2022. “Explainable machine learning model and reliability analysis for flexural capacity prediction of RC beams strengthened in flexure with FRCM.” Eng. Struct. 255: 113903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113903.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113903 ↗
40. Wang, L.-X., and J. M. Mendel. 1992. “Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22 (6): 1414–1427. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.199466.10.1109/21.199466 ↗
41. Xu L. M. Skoularidou A. Cuesta-Infante and K. Veeramachaneni. 2019. “Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN.” In Advances in neural information processing systems edited by H. Wallach H. Larochelle A. Beygelzimer F. d'Alché-Buc E. Fox and R. Garnett 7335–7345. Red Hook NY: Curran Associates Inc.
42. Younis, A., U. Ebead, and K. C. Shrestha. 2017. “Different FRCM systems for shear-strengthening of reinforced concrete beams.” Constr. Build. Mater. 153: 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.132.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.132 ↗
43. Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
44. Zadeh, L. A. 1975. “Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning: In memory of Grigore Moisil.” Synthese 30 (3): 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485052.10.1007/BF00485052 ↗