journal article·2026-07-27

Mechanical behavior of Al/Ep cast braided metal-wire skeleton tubular structures applied to projectile shells

Yongxin Li, Enling Tang, Yafei Han, Chuang Chen, Mengzhou Chang, Kai Guo, Liping He

Publisher page

Abstract

Al/Ep composites cast with braided metal-wire skeleton tubular structures exhibit promising potential for hard-target penetration applications due to their synergistic combination of structural reinforcement and energetic-material characteristics. This study systematically investigated the dynamic compressive responses of steel-wire and tungsten-wire skeleton tubes with Al/Ep mass ratios of 3:7, 4:6, and 5:5 using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests over an overall strain-rate range of 300–1200 s -1 , together with the penetration damage behavior of a tungsten-wire skeleton tubular projectile against a thick concrete target. The experimental results revealed strain-rate sensitivity across all specimen groups. For the 3:7 specimens, the maximum failure strength and failure strain increased by 165.4% and 147.7%, respectively, in the steel-wire skeleton tubes as the strain rate increased from 300 to 1200 s -1 , and by 179.1% and 176.3%, respectively, in the tungsten-wire skeleton tubes over the range of 500–1200 s -1 . The specimens with Al/Ep mass ratios of 4:6 and 5:5 showed the same strain-rate-sensitive trend, although the magnitude of the increase depended on the mass ratio and skeleton material. At a strain rate of 1200 s -1 , both the maximum failure strength and failure strain decreased with increasing Al/Ep mass ratio, while the tungsten-wire skeleton tubes consistently exhibited higher values than the corresponding steel-wire skeleton tubes. A phenomenological polynomial constitutive model was established to interpolate the dynamic compressive responses within the strain-rate tested range. In the penetration test conducted at an impact velocity of 240.67 m/s, the projectile penetrated the concrete target to a depth of 120 mm and produced a damaged region measuring approximately 300 mm × 200 mm. The simulated penetration depth was 125.3 mm, corresponding to a relative error of 4.42%, supporting the applicability of the numerical model for interpreting the present penetration process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenyang Ligong University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Leading Talents of the Xingliao Talent Program · Liaoning Province Academic Head Goose Project · Technology Commission of the Central Military Commission

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168441769092710.1177/0731684417690927 ↗
2. Huang D. Research on the effect of braided structure on the mechanical properties of composite pipe fittings [D]. Zhejiang University of Technology, 2017.
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11302010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113020 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1409191610.3390/polym14091916 ↗
5. Xiong XINFA, Wang XUABEI, Wang KUN, et al. Axial compression properties and damage mechanism of three-dimensional braided composite circular tubes. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2023; 55(04): 702–710.
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.003 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10443-012-9309-010.1007/s10443-012-9309-0 ↗
8. Zhang C, Xu X, Chen K. Damage mechanism analysis of 2D 1 × 1 Braided composites under unidirectional tension. Trans Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2013; 30(004): 317–327.
9. 10.1007/s10853-016-0709-710.1007/s10853-016-0709-7 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.496358410.1063/1.4963584 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.01810.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751769061910.1177/0040517517690619 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-019-1088-x10.1007/s12221-019-1088-x ↗
14. 10.1007/s10443-019-09769-310.1007/s10443-019-09769-3 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808371877597710.1177/1528083718775977 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.090 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1311258810.3390/ma13112588 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10693510.1016/j.tws.2020.106935 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11269110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112691 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11290310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112903 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10981510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109815 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10754710.1016/j.tws.2021.107547 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10938910.1016/j.tws.2022.109389 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199831662861910.1177/0021998316628619 ↗
25. 10.1177/1056789524124575410.1177/10567895241245754 ↗
26. Jianbo X, Lin J, Tang R, et al. Experimental study of concrete penetration by long rod projectiles. Explosion and Shock 2002; 22(02): 174–178.
27. Bin L. Research on the effect of kinetic energy attacking combat unit on concrete target invasion and explosion. [Doctoral dissertation, China Academy of Engineering Physics]. 2009.
28. Liu X, Liu J, Cheng W, et al. Experimental study of low velocity vertical penetration of unreinforced concrete by projectiles. Explosion and Impact 1999; 19(04): 323–328.
29. Ma A-E, Feng-Lei H. Experimental study of oblique penetration of projectile into reinforced concrete. J Beijing Inst Technol 2007; 27(06): 482–486.
30. He X, Xu X, Sun G. Experiments on the effect of projectile penetration into concrete at high speed[J]. Explosion and Shock 2010; 30(01): 1–6.
31. Lijun Z. Research on key technology of multi-purpose ammunition for tank gun [D]. Shenyang University of Technology, 2018.
32. Song S, Cai H. SPH algorithm for projectile penetration into concrete. Explosion and Impact 2003; 23(01): 56–60.
33. Zhou Y. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of concrete material under penetration and blast loading[D]. National University of Defense Technology, 2004.
34. Chen X. Mechanical design of kinetic energy deep penetration projectile (I): penetration/armor-piercing theory and wall thickness analysis of projectile body. Explosion and Shock 2005; 25(06): 499–505.
35. Sun Q, Ruiyu LI, Yayun ZHAO, et al. Parametric study of HJC model simulating reinforced concrete intrusion experiment. Eng Mech 2016; 33(08): 248–256.
36. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.03410.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.034 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.07.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.07.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.10649410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106494 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.03310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.033 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.10481610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104816 ↗
41. 10.1063/5.028233810.1063/5.0282338 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11955010.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119550 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10499610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104996 ↗
44. Chen G, Chen X, Chen Z, et al. Numerical analysis of damage modes of A3 steel blunt-ended projectile impacting 45 steel plates. Explosion and Shock 2007; 27(05): 390–397.
45. Lu F, Rong CHEN. Experimental technique of hopkinson rod[M]. Science Press, 2013.
46. Chen W, Song B. Separate hopkinson (cowleski) rods: design, test and application [M]. National Defense Industry Press, 2018.
47. Xue F. Theoretical and experimental study on the intrinsic relationship of ferromagnetic materials [D]. Tsinghua University, 2002.
48. GB 50010-2010. Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press 2015.
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗