A hybrid ANN–GA framework for multi-objective optimization of surface integrity in Nd: YAG laser percussion drilling of 4.5 mm Al/SiC composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a hybrid modelling and optimisation framework integrating Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Genetic Algorithms (GAs) to enhance laser beam percussion drilling (LBPD) of aluminium–silicon carbide (Al/SiC) metal matrix composites (MMCs). Experiments were performed on 4.5 mm-thick Al/SiC plates using an Nd: YAG laser to investigate the effects of lamp current, assist gas pressure (AGP), and pulse width on key quality characteristics—surface roughness, microcrack width, and recast layer thickness. A Central Composite Design was employed to plan the experiments systematically. The trained ANN model was integrated with GA for multi-objective optimization. The optimized parameters resulted in a 26.21% improvement in SR, a 29.68% reduction in MCW, and a 35.93% decrease in RLT compared with initial conditions. Experimental validation using SEM and surface profilometry confirmed the predictive capability of the ANN–GA model, establishing its effectiveness for precision drilling of Al/SiC composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.11.13810.1016/j.jmrt.2025.11.138 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11016610.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110166 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-024-13189-410.1007/s00170-024-13189-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.11192910.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111929 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40430-024-04992-x10.1007/s40430-024-04992-x ↗
6. 10.1007/s10845-025-02599-010.1007/s10845-025-02599-0 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-010-2945-310.1007/s00170-010-2945-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.05710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.057 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.01410.1016/j.jer.2023.07.014 ↗
10. 10.1177/095440621987791110.1177/0954406219877911 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.01610.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.016 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11050210.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110502 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40516-019-00109-810.1007/s40516-019-00109-8 ↗
14. 10.1007/s40430-019-1727-610.1007/s40430-019-1727-6 ↗
15. 10.3390/jmmp903009210.3390/jmmp9030092 ↗
16. 10.1081/AMP-20006040210.1081/AMP-200060402 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1713172810.3390/polym17131728 ↗
18. Der O, Tasci M, Basar G, et al. Intelligent modeling and prediction of CO2 laser cutting performance in FFF-printed thermoplastics using machine learning algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng. 2025; 09544089251366429. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251366429
19. 10.3390/ma1818431910.3390/ma18184319 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-026-42714-610.1038/s41598-026-42714-6 ↗
21. 10.1080/0371750X.2026.265534910.1080/0371750X.2026.2655349 ↗
22. Yadav A, Dubey AK, Sharma SK, et al. Precision characterization of hole attributes in Nd:YAG laser percussion drilling of Al/SiC MMC. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng. 2025; 09544089251321931. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251321931
23. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.09.05410.1016/j.optlastec.2017.09.054 ↗
24. Yadav A, Dubey AK, Upadhyaya BN. Experimental analysis of ultrasonic vibration-assisted laser beam percussion drilling of 4.5-mm-thick MMC. J Mater Eng Perform. 2026; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-026-14164-8
25. 10.1007/s42452-025-07281-x10.1007/s42452-025-07281-x ↗
26. 10.1007/s40516-017-0041-310.1007/s40516-017-0041-3 ↗
27. Haykin S. Neural networks and learning machines. 3rd ed. Pearson Education, 2009.
28. Haupt RL, Haupt SE. Practical genetic algorithms. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
29. 10.1007/s00170-019-03704-310.1007/s00170-019-03704-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.01710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.017 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10672110.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106721 ↗
32. 10.1080/0305215X.2024.243420110.1080/0305215X.2024.2434201 ↗