journal article·2026-07-28

Experimental and machine learning analysis of the wear and mechanical performance with morphological investigation of ZnO- and WC-nanoparticle reinforced glass/flax hybrid composites

Raşit Koray Ergün

Publisher page

Abstract

Hybrid fiber polymer composites are increasingly employed in structural applications due to their multifunctional performance. In this study, glass/flax hybrid composites (HFRCs) were reinforced with ZnO and WC nanoparticles at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt.% contents. The combined effects of nanoparticle and reinforcement ratio, load, and sliding speed on mechanical and tribological behavior were systematically evaluated. Tensile and flexural tests demonstrated that low nanoparticle contents enhanced mechanical performance. In particular, 0.5 wt.% WC reinforced HFRCs exhibited increases of approximately 13% in tensile failure load and 22% in flexural failure load compared to neat composites. The mass losses of neat, WC, and ZnO reinforced HFRCs were determined as 0.00045 gr, 0.00017 gr, and 0.00024 gr, respectively. Compared to neat HFRCs, WC and ZnO reinforcements reduced mass loss by approximately 62% and 47%. WC reinforced composites yielded the lowest COF (∼0.14) with minimum wear rate of 8.35 × 10 −3 mm 3 /m, corresponding to a reduction of up to 60% relative to neat composites. The systematic implementation of a quantitative wear damage characterization methodology, which remains insufficiently explored in the literature, and the evaluation of the tribological performance of HFRCs through a dual-parameter approach considering both mass loss and areal wear significantly enhance the novelty of this study. Furthermore, the direct correlation of SEM/EDS analysis with quantitative wear data and the numerical characterization of wear tracks and matrix deformation regions in relation to wear severity provide a comprehensive clarification of wear mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Batman University

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1303039510.3390/polym13030395 ↗
2. Devendra K, Rangaswamy T. Evaluation of thermal properties of E-Glass/Epoxy composites filled by different filler materials. Int J Comput Eng Res 2012; 2: 1708–1714.
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.26410.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.264 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.24110.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.241 ↗
5. 10.1002/asia.20240070110.1002/asia.202400701 ↗
6. 10.1002/vnl.2013510.1002/vnl.20135 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.26410.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.264 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00821-610.1016/S0032-3861(99)00821-6 ↗
9. 10.2339/politeknik.130784910.2339/politeknik.1307849 ↗
10. Demir ME. The effect of graphite addition on the friction coefficient and wear behavior of glass fiber reinforced composites [TT - grafit ilavesinin cam elyaf takviyeli kompozitlerin sürtünme katsayısı ve aşınma davranışları üzerine etkisi]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Derg 2024; 29: 113–124. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1374861
11. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.08010.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.080 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.029 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.35010.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.350 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.09.04610.1016/j.matpr.2018.09.046 ↗
17. 10.1080/15440478.2020.182129710.1080/15440478.2020.1821297 ↗
18. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac4e3f10.1088/2053-1591/ac4e3f ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.32610.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.326 ↗
20. 10.1177/152808371774076510.1177/1528083717740765 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:101123430166410.1023/A:1011234301664 ↗
22. 10.4236/jmmce.2011.101208710.4236/jmmce.2011.1012087 ↗
23. Thirupathy M, Vadivel M, Subbiah T, et al. Experimental investigation on the impact of tungsten carbide reinforcement on the mechanical properties of sisal-fiber-reinforced composites. Eng Proc 2024; 61: 40.
24. 10.1088/1757-899X/390/1/01200210.1088/1757-899X/390/1/012002 ↗
25. Chanakyan C, Ashok Raj R, Vinoth Kumar H, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of glass fibre with hybrid nano ceramic particles reinforced polymer composites for aerospace applications. Can Metall Q 2025; 65: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2025.2511506
26. 10.1177/0095244324130720010.1177/00952443241307200 ↗
27. Ibrahim MA Çamur H Savaş MA et al. Multi-response optimization and prediction of tribological behaviours of filled polytetrafluoroethylene composites using Taguchi-Deng and evolutionary Harris Hawk’s optimization methodologies. 2022.10.21203/rs.3.rs-1393204/v1 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00396-024-05356-610.1007/s00396-024-05356-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70208-710.1016/S0022-3913(97)70208-7 ↗
30. 10.3390/cryst1505045210.3390/cryst15050452 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.02.05510.1016/j.aej.2024.02.055 ↗
32. 10.3390/machines1311103110.3390/machines13111031 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00582-910.1016/S0924-0136(01)00582-9 ↗
34. 10.1108/RJTA-12-2022-015410.1108/RJTA-12-2022-0154 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0384810.1021/acsomega.2c03848 ↗
36. 10.37934/arfmts.87.3.789310.37934/arfmts.87.3.7893 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.triboint.2004.03.00210.1016/j.triboint.2004.03.002 ↗
38. Sudheer M, Prabhu R, Raju K, et al. Modeling and analysis for wear performance in dry sliding of Epoxy/Glass/PTW composites using full factorial techniques. Int Sch Res Not 2013; 2013: 624813. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/624813
39. 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.01510.1016/j.wear.2007.01.015 ↗
40. 10.1177/073168440708144010.1177/0731684407081440 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00554-310.1016/S0043-1648(01)00554-3 ↗
42. 10.2339/politeknik.144490710.2339/politeknik.1444907 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.01310.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.013 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12540-010-0407-y10.1007/s12540-010-0407-y ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2805510.1002/pc.28055 ↗
46. 10.1155/2023/819693310.1155/2023/8196933 ↗
47. 10.24012/dumf.175341610.24012/dumf.1753416 ↗
48. Demir ME, Ergün RK. Mechanical and wear performance of Al-mica-SiO2-filled glass fiber-reinforced composites and prediction of wear properties with artificial neural networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 2025; 240: 1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241307840
49. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.01110.1016/j.wear.2010.03.011 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.08310.1016/j.wear.2012.11.083 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.05010.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.050 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.028 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00290-410.1016/S0043-1648(03)00290-4 ↗
54. Reddy M, Valasingam S, Srinadh KV. Micro hardness and erosive wear behavior of tungsten carbide filled epoxy polymer nano composites. Int J Math Eng Manag Sci 2020; 5: 405–415. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.3.034
55. Yetgin S, Koyunbakan M, Yıldırım F, et al. Karbon elyaf dolgulu Pa6 polimer kompozitlerinin aşinma özellikleri üzerine uygulanan yük ve kayma hizinin etkisi. Acad Platform-Journal Eng Sci. 2017; 5(3): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.330662
56. 10.1155/2014/97046810.1155/2014/970468 ↗
57. 10.1002/pc.2987910.1002/pc.29879 ↗
58. 10.1080/15440478.2020.176444410.1080/15440478.2020.1764444 ↗
59. 10.1007/s13369-023-08207-810.1007/s13369-023-08207-8 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.050 ↗
61. 10.1002/vnl.2023110.1002/vnl.20231 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.04510.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.045 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.14610.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.146 ↗
64. 10.1007/s12046-025-03014-310.1007/s12046-025-03014-3 ↗
65. 10.1007/s12633-018-9817-010.1007/s12633-018-9817-0 ↗
66. 10.1007/s12633-018-0051-610.1007/s12633-018-0051-6 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.021 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12633-012-9121-310.1007/s12633-012-9121-3 ↗
69. 10.1186/2008-6695-5-2110.1186/2008-6695-5-21 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.03310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.033 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10100810.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101008 ↗
72. 10.1177/002199831350192410.1177/0021998313501924 ↗
73. 10.3390/buildings1310240610.3390/buildings13102406 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.25710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.257 ↗
75. Rashed H, Islam MA, Rizvi FB. Effects of process parameters on tensile strength of jute fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. J Nav Architect Mar Eng 2006; 3: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3329/jname.v3i1.923
76. 10.1080/09243046.2021.199356310.1080/09243046.2021.1993563 ↗
77. 10.1051/e3sconf/20245880101710.1051/e3sconf/202458801017 ↗
78. 10.1515/ijcre-2024-007410.1515/ijcre-2024-0074 ↗
79. 10.15376/biores.13.4.7430-744410.15376/biores.13.4.7430-7444 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11624810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116248 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.05910.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.059 ↗
82. 10.1155/2011/73647410.1155/2011/736474 ↗
83. 10.1063/5.019989510.1063/5.0199895 ↗