journal article·2015-02-25

Influence of softening curves on the residual fracture toughness of post-fire normal-strength concrete

Kequan Yu, Zhoudao Lu

Computers and Concrete· Volume 15· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The residual fracture toughness of post-fire normal-strength concrete subjected up to $600\circC$ is considered by the wedge splitting test. The initial fracture toughness $K_Iini$ and the critical fracture toughness $K_Iun$ could be calculated experimentally. Their difference is donated as the cohesive fracture toughness $K_I^c$ which is caused by the distribution of cohesive stress on the fracture process zone. A comparative study on determining the residual fracture toughness associated with three bi-linear functions of the cohesive stress distribution, i.e. Peterson's softening curve, CEB-FIP Model 1990 softening curve and Xu's softening curve, using an analytical method is presented. It shows that different softening curves have no significant influence on the fracture toughness. Meanwhile, comparisons between the experimental and the analytical calculated critical fracture toughness values further prove the validation of the double-K fracture model to the post-fire concrete specimens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. RILEM Mater. Struct · 1996 · 29 · 38310.1007/BF02486347 ↗
2. RILEM Mater Struct · 1983 · 16 · 155
3. ACI Mater. J · 1988 · 85 · 262
4. Int. J. Fract · 1990 · 44 · 11110.1007/BF00047063 ↗
5. Eng. Fract. Mech · 2011 · 78 · 289610.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.006 ↗
6. Z. Angew. Math. Mech · 1970 · 50 · 529
7. Constr. Build. Mater · 2013 · 44 · 44010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.040 ↗
8. Eng. Fract. Mech · 1991 · 40 · 113510.1016/0013-7944(91)90177-3 ↗
9. ACI Mater. J · 1985 · 82 · 310
10. Cement Concrete Res · 1976 · 6 · 77310.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
11. Constr. Build. Mater · 1997 · 11 · 10510.1016/S0950-0618(97)00005-6 ↗
12. J Eng Mech · 1985 · 111 · 122710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:10(1227) ↗
13. Eng. Fract. Mech · 1985 · 21 · 105510.1016/0013-7944(85)90009-8 ↗
14. Comput. Concr · 2012 · 9 · 110.12989/cac.2012.9.1.001 ↗
15. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater Struct · 2010 · 33 · 64510.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01477.x ↗
16. Eng. Fract. Mech · 2009 · 76 · 93510.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.018 ↗
17. Int. J. Fract · 2008 · 152 · 12710.1007/s10704-008-9275-6 ↗
18. Int. J. Fract · 2008 · 149 · 4710.1007/s10704-008-9227-1 ↗
19. Cement Concrete Res · 2008 · 38 · 106110.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.014 ↗
20. Mag. Concr. Res · 1986 · 38 · 6710.1680/macr.1986.38.135.67 ↗
21. RILEM Mater. Struct. · 2003 · 36 · 51510.1617/13880 ↗
22. Eng. Fract. Mech · 2008 · 75 · 380610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.002 ↗
23. Mag. Concr. Res · 1993 · 45 · 2510.1680/macr.1993.45.162.25 ↗
24. J Mater. Sci · 1995 · 30 · 160910.1007/BF00375272 ↗
25. J. Struct. Eng. · 1986 · 112 · 246210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2462) ↗
26. Cement Concrete Compos · 2007 · 29 · 30010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.002 ↗
27. Int. J. Fract · 1999 · 98 · 11110.1023/A:1018668929989 ↗
28. Int. J. Fract · 1999 · 98 · 15110.1023/A:1018740728458 ↗
29. Int. J. Fract · 1999 · 98 · 17910.1023/A:1018788611620 ↗
30. RILEM Mater. Struct · 2012 · 45 · 115510.1617/s11527-012-9823-4 ↗
31. RILEM Mater. Struct · 2014 · 47 · 83910.1617/s11527-013-0097-2 ↗
32. Mag. Concr. Res · 2000 · 52 · 12310.1680/macr.2000.52.2.123 ↗
33. Mag. Concr. Res · 2006 · 58 · 27710.1680/macr.2006.58.5.277 ↗
34. Cement Concrete Res. · 2002 · 32 · 36310.1016/S0008-8846(01)00684-6 ↗
35. ACI Mater · 2000 · 97 · 550
36. ACI Mater · 2000 · 97 · 556