Correlation of transverse rupture strength of WC–Co with hardness
Source abstract
Abstract
The transverse rupture strength (TRS) of WC–Co composites is often loosely viewed as an equivalent of “toughness” which increases as hardness decreases in the industry. The results of this study, conducted using a controlled group of WC–Co samples with consistent TRS values, suggest a different correlation between the TRS and hardness of WC–Co composites. It was shown that TRS is closely related to the hardness and facture toughness. Within a hardness range of 800 <Hv < 1500 kg/mm2, TRS appears to first increase and then decrease as the hardness increases. It reaches a peak value at Hv ≈ 1300 kg/mm2. While in the past TRS of WC–Co has been used as a indicator of porosities of WC–Co materials, the result of this study is understood on the basis that these samples are porosity-free because most products of WC–Co today contains very little (if any) porosity owing to modern advances in processing technologies. When the effect of porosity is negligible, TRS is determined by intrinsic mechanical properties which are dependent of microstructure and compositions. The relationship between TRS and hardness and the fracture toughness is explained by a qualitative model based on the work hardening and flow stress of the cobalt binder phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. The fracture strength of sintered tungsten carbide–cobalt alloys in relation to composition and particle spacing
2. A review of parameters influencing some mechanical properties of tungsten carbide–cobalt alloys10.1179/pom.1970.13.25.002 ↗
3. Relations of strength, composition, and grain size of sintered WC–Co alloys
4. Comments on microstructure and the transverse rupture strength of cemented carbides
5. Fischmeister HF. Development and present status of the science and technology of hard materials. In: Viswanadham RK, Rowcliffe, DJ, Gurland J, editors. Science of Hard Materials. Proceedings of international conference on science of hard materials, August 1981. New York: Plenum. p. 1–42
6. Fault distributions in brittle materials10.1016/0025-5416(74)90160-8 ↗
7. A model for the limiting strength of hardmetals
8. Almond EA. Deformation characteristics and mechanical properties of hardmetals. In: Viswanadham RK, Rowcliffe, DJ, Gurland J, editors. Science of hard materials. Proceedings of international conference on science of hard materials, August 1981. New York: Plenum. p. 517–6110.1007/978-1-4684-4319-6_29 ↗
9. New developments in cemented carbide cutting tools10.1016/0043-1648(80)90038-1 ↗
10. Brookes · 1992
11. The tensile strength of hardmetals10.1007/BF00611463 ↗
12. Notched bend tests on WC–Co hardmetals10.1007/BF01174066 ↗
13. Roebuck B. Effect of testpiece geometry on the flexural strength of representative hardmetals and cermets. In: Kneringer G, Rodhammer P, Wilhartitz P. Plansee AG, editors. Proceedings of the 14th Plansee Seminar, Reutte, vol. 2; 1997. p. 352–65
14. Nondestructive evaluation of WC–Co composites using magnetic properties
15. Pickens JR. The fracture toughness of tungsten carbide–cobalt Alloys as a function of microstructural parameters. Ph.D. Dissertation. June 1977, Brown University
16. A microstructural model for hardness in WC–Co composites10.1016/0001-6160(85)90132-4 ↗
17. Experimental study of mechanics of fracture of WC–Co alloys10.1007/BF02647199 ↗
18. On the fracture toughness of cemented carbides10.1016/0001-6160(88)90143-5 ↗
19. Fracture toughness of two phase WC–Co cermets10.1016/0956-7151(94)90057-4 ↗
20. Lee HC, Gurland J. On the hardness of cemented carbides. NSF Hard Materials Research Workshop. June 1975, University of Cincinnati