Exploring interpretable features of hardness for intermetallic compounds prepared by spark plasma sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
Intermetallic compounds, known for their excellent hardness, conductivity, and strength, have significant applications in aerospace and automotive industries. Hardness is a crucial mechanical property in the development and optimization of intermetallic compounds (IMCs), and meanwhile, spark plasma sintering (SPS) serves as a prevalent technique for preparing IMCs. In this study, a dataset of Vickers hardness of binary intermetallic compounds prepared by SPS and potential feature sets influencing the target performance (H V ) were collected. Three machine-learning strategies were developed and comprehensively evaluated. The first strategy focuses on processing parameters and compositions, the second incorporates physical properties in addition to the features considered in the first strategy, and the third one employs a combined feature engineering based on the second strategy. The third strategy, which includes three screened features through a rigorous feature engineering process, achieves the highest predictive accuracy. Subsequently, a symbolic regression (SR) model based on genetic programming (GP) was employed to develop a physically interpretable formula linking the target performance with the selected features. The findings of this study are of significance for developing high-performance intermetallic compounds.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Synthesis of Ti-cu multiphase alloy by spark plasma sintering: mechanical and corrosion properties10.3390/met12071089 ↗
2. Role of Si on lamellar formation and mechanical response of two SPS Ti–15Al–15Si and Ti–10Al–20Si intermetallic alloys10.1016/j.intermet.2021.107099 ↗
3. Investigation on temperature control in the SPS process with titanium aluminides
4. High temperature oxidation behavior and research status of modifications on improving high temperature oxidation resistance of titanium alloys and titanium aluminides: a review10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.212 ↗
5. Metallurgical processing of titanium aluminides on industrial scale10.1016/j.intermet.2018.09.006 ↗
6. Mechanical properties and microstructures of a modified Al-Si-cu alloy prepared by thixoforming process for automotive connecting rods10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.085 ↗
7. Hardness as an indicator of material strength: a critical review
8. Preparation of TiAl15Si15 intermetallic alloy by mechanical alloying and the spark plasma sintering method10.1080/00325899.2019.1569812 ↗
9. The sintering mechanism in spark plasma sintering – proof of the occurrence of spark discharge10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.011 ↗
10. Preparation of Ti3SiC2 MAX phase from Ti, TiC, and SiC by SPS10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.149 ↗
11. Application of SPS consolidation and its influence on the properties of the FeAl20Si20 alloys prepared by mechanical alloying10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.030 ↗
12. Effect of reactive SPS on the microstructure and properties of a dual-phase Ni-Al intermetallic compound and Ni-Al-TiB2 composite10.3390/ma13245668 ↗
13. Spark plasma sintering of metals and metal matrix nanocomposites: a review10.1155/2012/983470 ↗
14. Oxide reduction effects in SPS processing of cu atomized powder containing oxide inclusions10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.044 ↗
15. Electric current activation of sintering: a review of the pulsed electric current sintering process10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04210.x ↗
16. Challenges and opportunities for spark plasma sintering: a key technology for a new generation of materials
17. Machine learning (ML)-assisted optimization doping of KI in MAPbI3 solar cells10.1007/s12598-020-01579-y ↗
18. Machine learning in materials science10.1002/inf2.12028 ↗
19. Predicting the hardness of high-entropy alloys based on compositions10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106116 ↗
20. Latest progress on refractory high entropy alloys: composition, fabrication, post processing, performance, simulation and prospect10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105993 ↗
21. Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010 ↗
22. Identifying facile material descriptors for Charpy impact toughness in low-alloy steel via machine learning10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.051 ↗
23. An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.009 ↗
24. Combustion machine learning: principles, progress and prospects10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101010 ↗
25. Integrating machine learning with mechanistic models for predicting the yield strength of high entropy alloys10.1063/5.0106124 ↗
26. Micro-and macroscopic aspects of the intermittent behaviors of granular materials related by graph neural network10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111763 ↗
27. Using nachine learning to predict the dissociation energy of organic carbonyls10.1021/acs.jpca.0c01280 ↗
28. Quantitative relationship model between workload and time pressure under different flight operation tasks10.1016/j.ergon.2016.05.008 ↗
29. Behavior of intermetallic compounds of Al-Ti composite manufactured by spark plasma sintering10.3390/ma12020331 ↗
30. The effect of alumina nanoparticles addition on high-temperature wear behavior of intermetallic iron aluminide produced by the spark plasma sintering process10.1142/S0218625X20500043 ↗
31. Mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering of the intermetallic compound Ti50Al5010.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.060 ↗
32. Characterization of NiAl intermetallic produced by mechanical alloying and consolidated by spark plasma sintering10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.343-346.635 ↗
33. Microstructure, sintering behavior and mechanical properties of SiC/MoSi2 composites by spark plasma sintering10.1016/S1003-6326(18)64730-2 ↗
34. The extrusion and SPS of zirconium-copper powders and studies of selected mechanical properties10.3390/ma14133560 ↗
35. Fabrication of controlled expansion Al-Si composites by pressureless and spark plasma sintering10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.024 ↗
36. Effect of intermetallic compound on the Al-mg composite materials fabricated by mechanical ball milling and spark plasma sintering10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.054 ↗
37. Microstructure and properties of cu-10 wt% Al bronze obtained by high-energy mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering10.1016/j.matlet.2022.131671 ↗
38. Spark plasma sintering of Ti-48Al intermetallic using elemental powder10.1007/s00170-019-03750-x ↗
39. Synthesis of TiFe hydrogen absorbing alloys prepared by mechanical alloying and SPS treatment10.3390/met8040264 ↗
40. Machine learning-guided design of Pearlitic steel with promising mechanical and tribological properties10.1002/adem.202100505 ↗
41. Development of constitutive relationship model of Ti600 alloy using artificial neural network10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.007 ↗
42. Application of artificial neural network and constitutive equations to describe the hot compressive behavior of 28CrMnMoV steel10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.049 ↗
43. A review on data-driven learning approaches for fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes10.1002/cben.202000027 ↗
44. Feature selection with SVD entropy: some modification and extension10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.029 ↗
45. Folded LDA: Extending the linear discriminant analysis algorithm for feature extraction and data reduction in hyperspectral remote sensing10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3129818 ↗
46. Prediction of compressive strength and Portland cement composition using cross-validation and feature ranking techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.224 ↗
47. Prediction of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine response in major depressive disorder using the GWAS-based machine learning approach10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.014 ↗
48. Advances in machine learning- and artificial intelligence-assisted material design of steels10.1007/s12613-022-2595-0 ↗
49. Improved material descriptors for bulk modulus in intermetallic compounds via machine learning10.1007/s12598-023-02282-4 ↗
50. Prediction of the drop hammer-derived tear toughness of pipeline steel production lines using literature data and production line data
51. Some misconceptions about R2. International society of six sigma professionals
52. Improved data-driven performance of Charpy impact toughness via literature-assisted production data in pipeline steel10.1007/s11431-023-2372-x ↗
53. Ensemble feature selection in medical datasets: combining filter, wrapper, and embedded feature selection results10.1111/exsy.12553 ↗
54. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
55. Lattice thermal conductivity prediction using symbolic regression and machine learning10.1021/acs.jpca.0c08103 ↗
56. Integration of neural network-based symbolic regression in deep learning for scientific discovery10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3017010 ↗
57. Machine learning and symbolic regression investigation on stability of MXene materials10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110578 ↗
58. Influence of process parameters on the sintering behaviour and densification of NiAl intermetallics fabricated by spark plasma sintering
59. Atomic-scale simulations in multi-component alloys and compounds: A review on advances in interatomic potential10.1016/j.jmst.2023.05.010 ↗