Temperature and deformation effect on the low and high angle grain boundary structure of a double forged pure tungsten
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In order to improve the performance of tungsten, a basic understanding of the microstructure–property relationships is essential. In the present study, a newly developed double forged pure tungsten grade from Plansee SE was investigated. By analysing the mechanical properties and microstructures in well-defined directions in the double forged tungsten, their relationships could be successfully correlated. A large amount of sub-grains with a typical size below 5 μm were observed in the as-received double-forged tungsten. After thermally treating the double forged tungsten up to 2000 °C, microstructural recovery was observed with the onset of recrystallization. Meanwhile, the sub-grain misorientation angle increased accompanied by sub-grain growth. The deformation temperature and the strain rate considerably influenced the final microstructure. The higher the temperature, the lower the amount of sub-grain boundaries due to sub-grain coarsening and the clearer the grain boundaries. The higher the deformation strain rate during tensile testing, the higher the grain orientation spread and the larger the sub-grain misorientation, but the smaller the grain size due to a lower extent of crystallization. This matched well with the mechanical testing data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Kaufmann · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 52110.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.03.045 ↗
2. Barabash · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 2110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.017 ↗
3. Norajitra · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 159410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.137 ↗
4. Davis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 30810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00285-2 ↗
5. Hahn · 1962 · 23
6. Wittenauer · Adv. Mater. Process. · 1992 · 142 · 28
7. Kurishita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 57910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.181 ↗
8. Sheng · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2012 · 246 · 19810.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.10.008 ↗
9. Pacher · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 117210.1016/S0022-3115(98)00567-4 ↗
10. Makhankov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 111710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00668-1 ↗
11. Uytdenhouwen · 2011
12. Flewitt · 2001
13. Pintsuk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 48110.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.109 ↗
14. Sakharova · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 98 · 4410.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.01.038 ↗
15. Verlinden · 2007
16. Humphreys · 2004
17. Doherty · Mater. Today · 1998 · 1 · 1410.1016/S1369-7021(98)80046-1 ↗
18. Holm · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 270110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00079-X ↗
19. Humphreys · Acta Mater. · 1997 · 45 · 423110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00070-0 ↗