Enhancing mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained tungsten for fusion applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Tungsten, while showing many favorable properties, faces challenges in high-performance applications due to its brittle nature. One strategy to improve strength and toughness in tungsten is to refine the grain size down to the ultra-fine grained (ufg) regime. However, as the grain size is reduced, the fraction of grain boundaries that provide easy paths for crack growth increases, thereby limiting the gain in ductility. Therefore, strengthening the grain boundaries is of great importance if one wants to tap the full potential of this material. Using ab-initio calculations, potential grain boundary cohesion enhancing doping elements were identified, and doped ultra-fine grained tungsten samples were fabricated from powders and characterized extensively using small-scale testing techniques. We found that additions of boron and hafnium improve the mechanical properties of tungsten remarkably. Furthermore, an additional low-temperature heat treatment of the boron-doped sample promotes grain boundary segregation, enhancing the properties even further. Thus, in this work we provide an effective pathway of improving mechanical properties in ultra-fine grained tungsten using grain boundary segregation engineering. This opens the door for many challenging applications of ufg W in harsh environments. To further underline the potential employment of ufg W in nuclear fusion reactors, a favorable swelling behavior and mechanical property response after irradiation with helium is presented within this work.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashby · 2011
2. Ritchie · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 81710.1038/nmat3115 ↗
3. He · Science (80-.) · 2017 · 357 · 102910.1126/science.aan0177 ↗
4. Gottstein · 2004
5. Launey · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 210310.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
6. Hall · Proc. Phys. Soc. · 1951 · 64 · 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
7. Petch · J. Iron Steel Inst. · 1953 · 174 · 25
8. Meyers · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
9. Koch · 2007
10. Pippan · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2016 · 4 · 12710.1080/21663831.2016.1166403 ↗
11. Hohenwarter · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A · 2015 · 373 · 2014036610.1098/rsta.2014.0366 ↗
12. Carlton · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 374910.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.021 ↗
13. Koch · MRS Bull. · 1999 · 24 · 5410.1557/S0883769400051551 ↗
14. Raabe · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 18 · 25310.1016/j.cossms.2014.06.002 ↗
15. Lejcek · 2010
16. Wu · Science (80-.) · 2006 · 265 · 37610.1126/science.265.5170.376 ↗
17. Liu · Acta Metall. · 1985 · 33 · 21310.1016/0001-6160(85)90139-7 ↗
18. Clemens · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2013 · 15 · 19110.1002/adem.201200231 ↗
19. Scheiber · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2016 · 24 · 8500910.1088/0965-0393/24/8/085009 ↗
20. Scheiber · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2016 · 60 · 7510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2016.07.003 ↗
21. Lee · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 77 · 13110.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.034 ↗
22. Fonstein · 2015
23. Gludovatz · Science (80-.) · 2014 · 345 · 115310.1126/science.1254581 ↗
24. Rieth · Adv. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 73 · 1110.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.73.11 ↗
25. Wurster · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 18110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.074 ↗
26. Olander · 1977
27. Allen · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 178 · 25610.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.11.039 ↗
28. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 147 · 10010.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.015 ↗
29. El-Atwani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 458 · 21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.095 ↗
30. El-Atwani · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 410.1038/srep04716 ↗
31. El-Atwani · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2017 · 5 · 34310.1080/21663831.2017.1292326 ↗
32. El-Atwani · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 5410.1088/0029-5515/54/8/083013 ↗
33. Leitner · Mater. Des. · 2018 · 142 · 3610.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.012 ↗
34. B. Gludovatz, S. Wurster, A. Hoffmann, R. Pippan, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 28 (2010) 674–678.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.04.007 ↗
35. Gludovatz · Philos. Mag. · 2011 · 91 · 300610.1080/14786435.2011.558861 ↗
36. Reiser · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2017 · 64 · 26110.1016/j.ijrmhm.2016.10.018 ↗
37. Wurster · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 413 · 16610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.025 ↗
38. Valiev · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
39. Pippan · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 40 · 31910.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104445 ↗
40. Wurmshuber · Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 580
41. Pippan · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2008 · 584–586 · 1610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.16 ↗
42. Lassner · 1999
43. Warren · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 1996 · 14 · 34510.1016/S0263-4368(96)00027-3 ↗
44. Pippan · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2006 · 8 · 104610.1002/adem.200600133 ↗
45. Carrera · 2011
46. Motz · Acta Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 426910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.036 ↗
47. Huang · Science (80-.) · 2006 · 312 · 24910.1126/science.1124268 ↗
48. Renk · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 95 · 2710.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.023 ↗
49. Van Swygenhoven · Mater. Today · 2006 · 9 · 2410.1016/S1369-7021(06)71494-8 ↗
50. Rebhan · 2005 · 304
51. Wurmshuber · Mater. Charact. · 2021 · 17110.1016/j.matchar.2020.110822 ↗
52. El-Atwani · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 180 · 610.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.01.013 ↗
53. Allen · Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2021 · 12 · 63310.3762/bjnano.12.52 ↗
54. Ziegler · 1985
55. Kurki-Suonio · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 4910.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095001 ↗
56. Konobeyev · Nucl. Energy Technol. · 2017 · 3 · 16910.1016/j.nucet.2017.08.007 ↗
57. Banisalman · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2017 · 495 · 27710.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.08.019 ↗
58. Yang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2018 · 512 · 13710.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.022 ↗
59. Kiener · J. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 27 · 272410.1557/jmr.2012.303 ↗
60. Hosemann · J. Mater. Res. · 2015 · 30 · 123110.1557/jmr.2015.26 ↗
61. Bonnekoh · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2019 · 78 · 14610.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.09.010 ↗