Modified AASHTO empirical pavement design method for geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt
Source abstract
Abstract
Geosynthetics are commonly adopted to retard problems associated with reflective cracking in asphalt, although their inclusion as asphalt reinforcements also provides structural benefits. However, methodologies are yet to develop to incorporate these structural benefits into design. This study proposes a design method to account for structural capacity increase by geosynthetics in asphalt. The proposed method relies on quantifying a tensile strain reduction ratio (α) defined as the ratio between elastic tensile strain in HMA in a geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt road and that in an equivalent unreinforced road. Implementation of the design method involves incorporating a modified structural number or modified ESAL into AASHTO1993 design by using an equivalent modulus or an equivalent axle load factor for asphalt-geosynthetic composite. The geosynthetic benefits were ultimately accounted for in design either by reducing the asphalt thickness or by increasing the traffic volume. This paper presents the results of parametric evaluations of geosynthetic benefits for α ranging from 0.8 to 0.4. Design charts were developed to facilitate adoption of the proposed design method, and a design example is provided to illustrate the predicted benefits. It was found that 20% to 33% reduction in asphalt thickness, or 1.8- to 4.0-fold increase in traffic volume, is feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
HDR Inc. 1 , Toronto,
Huesker Inc. 2 , Leander, , , E-mail: vkumar@huesker.com
The Transtec Group Inc. 3 , Austin, , , E-mail: subu@thetranstecgroup.com
University of Texas at Austin 4 Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, , Austin, , , E-mail: zornberg@mail.utexas.edu
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 1993
2. AASHTO · 2009
3. Al-Qadi · 2006 · 131
4. Asphalt Institute (1982). Research and Development of the Asphalt Institute's Thickness Design Manual (MS-l). 9th edn.Research Report No. 82-2, August 1982.
5. Berg · 2000 · 176
6. Brown, S. F., Thom, N. H., Sanders, P. J., Brodrick, B. V. & Cooper, S. (1999). Reinforced asphalt, Final report to Tensar International, ABG Ltd, Maccaferri Ltd., Scott Wilson Pavement Engineering, Bardon Aggregates, and 6D Solutions. Report No. PGR 99025. University of Nottingham, School of Civil Engineering, UK.
7. A study of grid reinforced asphalt to combat reflection cracking
8. Mechanical response of flexible pavements enhanced with geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays10.1680/jgein.15.00041 ↗
9. Cuelho, E., Perkins, S. & Morris, Z. (2014). Relative Operational Performance of Geosynthetics Used as Subgrade Stabilization, Report FHWA/MT-14-002/7712-251. Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University – Bozeman, Bozeman, MT, USA.
10. Elseifi, M. A. (2003). Performance Quantification of Interlayer Systems in Flexible Pavements Using Finite Element Analysis, Instrument Response and Non-Destructive Testing. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA.
11. Experimental evaluation of the influence of surface coating on fiberglass geogrid performance in asphalt pavements10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.02.011 ↗
12. Rational design method for bituminous pavements reinforced by geogrid10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.04.008 ↗
13. Structural response of grid-reinforced bituminous pavements10.1617/s11527-014-0255-1 ↗
14. Geotextile-reinforced un-paved road design10.1061/AJGEB6.0001187 ↗
15. Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads: I. development of design method10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775) ↗
16. Mechanical response of full-scale geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt overlays subjected to repeated loads10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100617 ↗
17. Fatigue performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt layers10.1680/jgein.21.00013 ↗
18. Influence of asphalt thickness on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt: full-scale field study10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.06.005 ↗
19. Kumar, V. V., Roodi, G. H., Subramanian, S., Saxena, A., Blake, C. & Zornberg, J. G. (2024). Geosynthetic Reinforcement in Asphalt Overlays for Increased Roadway Structural Capacity. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-25/0-7002-1, Texas DOT, Austin, TX, USA.
20. Influence of paving interlayer material on performance of full-scale asphalt overlays
21. Investigation on the effectiveness of synthetic asphalt reinforcements
22. Larkin · 1983 · LP
23. Use of geotextiles for reinforcement and strain relief in asphalt concrete10.1016/0266-1144(89)90004-6 ↗
24. Molenaar · 1995
25. Design method for plain and geogrid reinforced overlays on cracked pavements
26. Laboratory characterization of optimized geocomposites for asphalt pavement reinforcement10.1680/gein.13.00032 ↗
27. Perkins · 2004
28. Cross-Shear test for geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100902 ↗
29. SABITA TG3 · 2022
30. Influence of geosynthetic-interlayers on the performance of asphalt overlays on pre-cracked pavements10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.01.010 ↗
31. A review on mechanical behavior and design considerations for reinforced-rehabilitated bituminous pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119483 ↗
32. Full-scale trafficking of geosynthetic-reinforced road sections
33. Stewart · 1977
34. Use of geosynthetics for reinforcing/stabilizing unpaved roads under full-scale truck axle loads
35. ILLI-PAVE Based Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Pavement Design Procedure
36. Van Til, C. J., McCullough, B. F., Vallerga, B. A. & Hicks, R. G. (1972). Evaluation of AASHO Interim Guides for Design of Pavement Structures. NCHRP Report 128, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, p. 124.
37. Witczak, M. W. (1981). Equivalent Wheel Load Factors. Report prepared for Association of American Railroads. University of Maryland, Feb. 1981.
38. Practical overlay design for geogrid reinforcement of asphalt layers10.1080/14680629.2019.1590222 ↗
39. Functions and applications of geosynthetics in roadways10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.048 ↗