Microscopic mechanism of hydrogen trapping by carbides in Cr-containing oilwell tubes: A first-principles study
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on density functional theory (DFT), this study focuses on hydrogen-induced damage in Cr-containing tubing steels under H 2 S–CO 2 corrosive environments. Four typical carbides, namely Fe 3 C, Cr 3 C 2 , Cr 7 C 3 , and Cr 23 C 6 , were selected as unified research objects. An atomic-scale analytical framework integrating surface activity, hydrogen adsorption, charge transfer, and energy evolution along linear interpolation paths was established to systematically compare the hydrogen-trapping capability and migration tendency of different carbides. Particular emphasis was placed on revealing the influence mechanism of the Cr atomic coordination environment in Cr-rich carbides on hydrogen adsorption and stable trapping. The results show that the Cr 3 C 2 (001) surface exhibits the highest surface energy of 3.850 J/m 2 , indicating the strongest surface activity and initial hydrogen adsorption tendency. Adsorption energy calculations demonstrate that the Cr-atom-constituted hollow sites on Cr 3 C 2 and Cr 7 C 3 surfaces possess hydrogen adsorption energies as low as −1.204 eV and −1.195 eV, respectively, which are significantly stronger than that of the Fe-hollow site on Fe 3 C (−0.631 eV). In addition, hydrogen atoms tend to occupy multi-atom coordinated concave sites, where stable trapping is achieved through multiple bonding interactions. The linear-interpolation-based path energy scanning results indicate that Cr 3 C 2 can effectively immobilise hydrogen atoms and suppress their penetration into the steel matrix, whereas Cr 7 C 3 can act as a deep trap, driving hydrogen atoms to diffuse into its bulk phase and enabling long-term immobilisation. These findings suggest that Cr 3 C 2 and Cr 7 C 3 play different types of hydrogen-blocking roles in Cr-containing tubing steels, serving as surface-retarding and bulk deep-trap precipitates, respectively. This study provides a theoretical basis for precipitate design in tubing steels resistant to stress corrosion cracking.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University
CNPC Tubular Goods Research Institute
Boda Oil and Gas Management Area, CNPC TARIM Oilfield Company, Xinjiang, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.11079010.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110790 ↗
2. 10.1179/1743278215Y.000000000110.1179/1743278215Y.0000000001 ↗
3. 10.1179/1743278215Y.000000001110.1179/1743278215Y.0000000011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.018 ↗
5. 10.1533/9780857093769.4.57010.1533/9780857093769.4.570 ↗
6. 10.1179/00070597279832335010.1179/000705972798323350 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11085510.1016/j.corsci.2022.110855 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:102615111835310.1023/A:1026151118353 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11197710.1016/j.corsci.2024.111977 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.01810.1016/j.msea.2016.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10277110.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102771 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aaz012210.1126/science.aaz0122 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aal241810.1126/science.aal2418 ↗
14. 10.1098/rspa.2006.168810.1098/rspa.2006.1688 ↗
15. 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-30410.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-304 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.012 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.00310.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.003 ↗
19. 10.1080/1478422X.2022.207755410.1080/1478422X.2022.2077554 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8CP05975F10.1039/C8CP05975F ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.15010.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.150 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00355-X10.1016/0022-3093(95)00355-X ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.11144910.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111449 ↗
27. 10.1039/D0TA12567A10.1039/D0TA12567A ↗
28. 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90579-X10.1016/0039-6028(84)90579-X ↗
29. 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00352-210.1016/S0039-6028(03)00352-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.04410.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.044 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
32. 10.7498/aps.37.129810.7498/aps.37.1298 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.23540710.1103/PhysRevB.80.235407 ↗
34. 10.1002/bbpc.1986090030410.1002/bbpc.19860900304 ↗
35. 10.1002/1521-3951(200202)229:3<1353::AID-PSSB1353>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1521-3951(200202)229:3<1353::AID-PSSB1353>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.23320210.1103/PhysRevB.69.233202 ↗
37. Yi-jie C, Shuang-lin HU, Xiao-song Z, et al. Diffusion behavior of H atom in TiC ceramic by first-principles calculations. Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemistry 2021; 43: 231–237.
38. 10.1002/9780470447710.ch410.1002/9780470447710.ch4 ↗
39. 10.1002/9780470447710.ch310.1002/9780470447710.ch3 ↗
40. 10.1039/C9RA10634K10.1039/C9RA10634K ↗
41. 10.1039/C6CP01394E10.1039/C6CP01394E ↗