A Comprehensive Review of Bio-Inspired Surface and Morphological Structures for Enhancing Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Performances: Trends, Mechanisms, and Future Horizons
Source abstract
Abstract
Bio-inspired wing designs have emerged as a revolutionary approach to enhancing aerodynamic and hydrodynamic performance across a wide range of engineering applications. This review presents a comprehensive exploration of the biological principles, physical mechanisms, and performance outcomes associated with aerodynamic characteristics of aerial vehicles through fine-scale biomimetic features. This review categorizes these bio-inspired surface and morphological models into static, superhydrophobic, and dynamic smart structures. Furthermore, it examines the underlying fluid mechanics through both experimental and computational studies, detailing key mechanisms including vortex manipulation, transition delay, reconfiguration, wake stabilization and flow deceleration. While demonstrating strong potential, the field faces challenges in scalability, structural integration, environmental durability, and performance under variable flow conditions. Future directions emphasize multifunctionality and standardized validation protocols. By unifying insights from nature with advances in biomimetics and fluid dynamics, this review outlines a roadmap for the next generation of intelligent, high-performance aerodynamic and hydrodynamic systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
AML & LASP, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Haidain District, Beijing 100190, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Drag reduction methods at solid-liquid interfaces10.1007/s40544-021-0502-8 ↗
2. Superlubricitive engineering—Future industry nearly getting rid of wear and frictional energy consumption10.1007/s40544-020-0393-0 ↗
3. Investigation on the unsteady aerodynamic performance of the Drela AG 08 and Boeing B29 airfoils subjected to heaving motion10.1080/15502287.2024.2403067 ↗
4. A review on the hydrodynamic characteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles
5. Insight into tribological problems of green ship and corresponding research progresses10.1007/s40544-017-0184-4 ↗
6. Comparative Assessment on Unsteady Aerodynamics of Thin and Thick Airfoils Subjected to Pitching Motion10.1080/23324309.2024.2336055 ↗
7. A brief review of bio-inspired surface technology and application toward underwater drag reduction10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106962 ↗
8. Aerodynamic Investigation of Passer Domesticus Inspired Biomimetic Wing at Low Reynolds number10.1177/09544062221079509 ↗
9. Thriving artificial underwater drag-reduction materials inspired from aquatic animals: Progresses and challenges10.1039/D0RA08672J ↗
10. Unsteady aerodynamics of plunging cambered foil at low Reynolds number10.1177/09544100221101724 ↗
11. A review of drag reduction technology inspired from biomimetic surfaces and functions10.26599/FRICT.2025.9440876 ↗
12. Research Progress on Biomimetic Drag Reduction Materials Inspired by Diverse Organisms: From Principle to Application10.1007/s42235-025-00756-y ↗
13. Large eddy simulation of the fluid–structure interaction in an abstracted aquatic canopy consisting of flexible blades10.1017/jfm.2020.858 ↗
14. Active and passive in-plane wall fluctuations in turbulent channel flows10.1017/jfm.2019.145 ↗
15. Progress and Future Challenges in Bionic Drag Reduction Research Inspired by Fish Skin Properties10.1021/acsami.5c12308 ↗
16. Directional droplet-actuation and fluid-resistance reduction performance on the bio-inspired shark-fin-like superhydrophobic surface10.1016/j.jtice.2019.01.015 ↗
17. Numerical Investigation of Flow Over Oscillating ambered Foil At Low Reynolds Number10.1115/1.4053556 ↗
18. Shark skin inspired riblet coatings for aerodynamically optimized high temperature applications in aeroengines10.1002/adem.201000265 ↗
19. Drag-reduction of 3D printed shark-skin-like surfaces10.1007/s40544-018-0246-2 ↗
20. Experimental study of a zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer over a bioinspired surface with 3D-printed shark scales10.1063/5.0301233 ↗
21. Biomimetic shark skin: Design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function10.1242/jeb.097097 ↗
22. Ecological roles and importance of sharks in the Anthropocene Ocean10.1126/science.adl2362 ↗
23. Arunvinthan, S., Raatan, V., Nadaraja Pillai, S., Pasha, A.A., Rahman, M.M., and A. Juhany, K. (2021). Aerodynamic characteristics of shark scale-based vortex generators upon symmetrical airfoil. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14071808 ↗
24. Bio-inspired surface texture fluid drag reduction using large eddy simulation
25. Shark skin-inspired designs that improve aerodynamic performance10.1098/rsif.2017.0828 ↗
26. A review of drag reduction methods and principles in bionic interface10.26599/FRICT.2025.9441033 ↗
27. Bristled shark skin: A microgeometry for boundary layer control?10.1088/1748-3182/3/4/046005 ↗
28. The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications10.1242/jeb.063040 ↗
29. Drag reducing surface fabrication with deformed sharkskin morphology10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000037 ↗
30. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
31. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: A review10.1098/rsta.2010.0201 ↗
32. Modeling and optimization of shark-inspired riblet geometries for low drag applications10.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.019 ↗
33. Improve the Aerodynamics Performance of the Wing Using Shark Denticles10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I1P106 ↗
34. Thrust generation by shark denticles10.1017/jfm.2024.978 ↗
35. Surface Modification of 3D Biomimetic Shark Denticle Structures for Drag Reduction10.1002/adma.202417337 ↗
36. Hamilton, B.W., Tutunea-Fatan, O.R., and Bordatchev, E.V. (2023). Drag reduction by fish-scale inspired transverse asymmetric triangular riblets: Modelling, preliminary experimental analysis and potential for fouling control. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8030324 ↗
37. Streak formation in flow over biomimetic fish scale arrays10.1242/jeb.205963 ↗
38. Performance enhancement of futuristic airplanes by nature inspired biomimetic fish scale arrays—A design approach
39. Flow field characteristics and drag reduction performance of high–low velocity stripes on the biomimetic imbricated fish scale surfaces10.1049/bsb2.12083 ↗
40. Feasibility of using bio-mimicking fish scale textures in LPBF for water drag-reducing surfaces10.1007/s40964-023-00394-y ↗
41. Dual-coupling drag reduction inspired by tuna skin: Fan-shaped imbricated fish scale composited with flexible coating10.1063/5.0066195 ↗
42. Transition delay using biomimetic fish scale arrays10.1038/s41598-020-71434-8 ↗
43. Morphological features of mucous secretory organ and mucous secretion of loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus skin for friction drag reduction10.1111/jfb.14186 ↗
44. Experimental investigations of the turbulent boundary layer for biomimetic protrusive surfaces inspired by pufferfish skin: Effects of spinal density and diameter10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01745 ↗
45. Water-trapping and drag-reduction effects of fish Ctenopharyngodon idellus scales and their simulations10.1007/s11431-016-0630-x ↗
46. Water wave energy harvesting and self-powered liquid-surface fluctuation sensing based on bionic-jellyfish triboelectric nanogenerator10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.006 ↗
47. Enhancing low-velocity water flow energy harvesting of triboelectric–electromagnetic generator via biomimetic-fin strategy and swing-rotation mechanism10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01908 ↗
48. Numerical simulation study on bionic mucus drag reduction of underwater vehicle10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2020034583 ↗
49. Drag reduction using lubricant-impregnated anisotropic slippery surfaces inspired by bionic fish scale surfaces containing micro-/nanostructured arrays10.1002/adem.202000821 ↗
50. Lotus leaf-inspired superhydrophobic piezoelectric nanofiber films for moisture-proof pressure sensing and energy harvesting10.1016/j.cej.2024.158874 ↗
51. Lotus leaf-inspired triboelectric sensor for detecting seismic transverse wave10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110621 ↗
52. Development of a biomimetic polyvinylidene fluoride membrane with a lotus leaf-inspired structure for enhanced oil-water separation10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135773 ↗
53. Droplet detachment and transport on a biomimetic surface inspired by lotus leaves under the influence of an electric field10.1063/5.0257235 ↗
54. Bio-inspired porous adsorbents with lotus-leaf-like hierarchical structures and mussel adhesive surfaces for high-capacity removal of toxic dyes10.1016/j.envres.2025.120776 ↗
55. Self–cleaning superhydrophobic coatings: Potential industrial applications10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.12.008 ↗
56. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces10.1006/anbo.1997.0400 ↗
57. Why so strong for the lotus leaf?10.1063/1.3036535 ↗
58. Superhydrophobic surfaces review: Functional application, fabrication techniques and limitations10.1177/2516598419836345 ↗
59. A critical review on robust self-cleaning properties of lotus leaf10.1039/D2SM01521H ↗
60. Superhydrophobic surfaces with a dual-layer micro- and nanoparticle coating for drag reduction10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.117 ↗
61. Reducing drag force on polyester fabric through superhydrophobic surface via nano-pretreatment and water repellent finishing10.1080/00405000.2017.1329646 ↗
62. One-step hydrothermal method to fabricate drag reduction superhydrophobic surface on aluminum foil10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.046 ↗
63. Bioinspired rice leaf and butterfly wing surface structures combining shark skin and lotus effects10.1039/c2sm26655e ↗
64. Water-Repellent Legs of Water Strider10.1038/432036a ↗
65. Fluid drag reduction and efficient self-cleaning with rice leaf and butterfly wing bioinspired surfaces10.1039/c3nr01710a ↗
66. Advancing superhydrophobic surfaces: From mechanism insights and design strategies to intelligent applications10.1063/5.0271653 ↗
67. Bio-inspired flapping wing robots with foldable or deformable wings: A review10.1088/1748-3190/ac9ef5 ↗
68. Flexible structures enhance fluid mixing in a channel flow10.1063/5.0186196 ↗
69. Wind tunnel investigation into the bio-inspired slotted winglets for micro air vehicles10.1177/09544062241308358 ↗
70. A novel aerodynamic drag-reduction mechanism using dolphin-inspired ultrasonic microvibrations10.1038/s41598-025-98585-w ↗
71. Effect of dolphin-inspired transverse wave microgrooves on drag reduction in turbulence10.1063/5.0186898 ↗
72. Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, J., and Tan, M. (2023). Design and analysis of a bionic gliding robotic dolphin. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8020151 ↗
73. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent boundary layer over a compliant wall10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.03.005 ↗
74. Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces10.1098/rspa.1997.0119 ↗
75. Drag reduction effect of coupling flexible tubes with turbulent flow10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60033-5 ↗
76. Drag reduction through self-texturing compliant bionic materials10.1038/srep40038 ↗
77. Aquatic animal colors and skin temperature: Biology’s selection for reducing oceanic dolphin’s skin friction drag10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.018 ↗
78. Passive drag reduction via bionic hull coatings10.5957/JOSR.09180068 ↗
79. Investigation of the drag reduction performance of bionic flexible coating10.1063/5.0016074 ↗
80. Dolphin-inspired skin microvibrations offer a novel pressure-dominated drag reduction mechanism10.1007/s42235-024-00638-9 ↗
81. Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent boundary layer over an anisotropic compliant wall10.1007/s10409-018-0820-x ↗
82. Zhang, X., Li, Y., and Zhang, X. (2022). Dynamic interactions of multiple wall-mounted flexible plates in a laminar boundary layer. Front. Phys., 10.10.3389/fphy.2022.881966 ↗
83. A simple mathematical model of airflow in waving plant canopies10.1007/BF00121050 ↗
84. A free flexible flap in channel flow10.1017/jfm.2022.282 ↗
85. Collective dynamics of dense hairy surfaces in turbulent flow10.1038/s41598-023-31534-7 ↗
86. Interaction between hairy surfaces and turbulence for different surface time scales10.1017/jfm.2018.935 ↗
87. Numerical simulations on the flow past a flexible filament with two fixed ends at a low Reynolds number10.1017/jfm.2025.172 ↗
88. Control of vortex shedding on a circular cylinder using self-adaptive hairy-flaps10.1016/j.crme.2011.11.009 ↗
89. The PELskin project—Part I: Fluid–structure interaction for a row of flexible flaps: A reference study in oscillating channel flow10.1007/s11012-016-0521-0 ↗
90. Drag reduction by flapping a flexible filament behind a stationary cylinder10.1063/5.0101446 ↗
91. Drag reduction study of a microfiber-coated cylinder10.1038/s41598-022-19302-5 ↗
92. Exploring the Role of Filaments in Channel Flow Modification Using the Immersed Boundary Lattice Boltzmann Method10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102952 ↗
93. Numerical study of the oscillatory boundary layer over wall-mounted flexible filaments10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.124101 ↗
94. Flexible polymeric tail for micro robot drag reduction bioinspired by the nature microorganisms
95. Numerical investigation of drag reduction characteristics of flexible plate based on two way fluid-structure interaction10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113795 ↗
96. Fluid–structure interaction in a flexible vegetation canopy in an open channel10.1017/jfm.2022.899 ↗
97. Drag force on submerged flexible vegetation in an open-channel flow10.1029/2023WR036879 ↗
98. Dynamics and fluid–structure interaction in turbulent flows within and above flexible canopies10.1017/jfm.2024.481 ↗
99. Forced and natural dynamics of a clamped flexible fiber in wall turbulence10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.L012601 ↗
100. Hydrodynamics of turbulent flow in channels with submerged flexible vegetation canopy