journal article·2027-01

Architecture-driven engineered lattice tetrahedral micro-scaffolds for extraskeletal osteogenesis

Liya Ai, Lingling Zheng, Dan Chen, Wenjie Wang, Chao Wang, Haiyan Liu, Mengqi Guo, Yu Hu, Antonio Apicella, Yubo Fan

Biomaterials· Volume 336
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y ↗
2. Regeneration of alveolar ridge defects. Consensus report of group 4 of the 15th European workshop on periodontology on bone regeneration10.1111/jcpe.13121 ↗
3. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review10.1016/j.ijom.2013.12.004 ↗
4. Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/jcpe.13061 ↗
5. Promises of functionally graded material in bone regeneration: current trends, properties, and challenges10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01416 ↗
6. Clinical translation of personalized bioengineered implant scaffolds10.1038/s44222-024-00269-z ↗
7. Calcium phosphate-based cements: clinical needs and recent progress10.1039/C2TB00061J ↗
8. Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions10.3928/0147-7447-20020502-04 ↗
9. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
10. Current options and future perspectives on bone graft and biomaterials substitutes for bone repair, from clinical needs to advanced biomaterials research10.3390/app13148471 ↗
11. Complications in bone-grafting procedures: classification and management10.1111/prd.12413 ↗
12. Vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) with the use of a cross-linked resorbable membrane, tenting screws, and a combination grafting technique: a report of three cases
13. Reduced surgical complications in graft-masked 3D ti mesh for alveolar augmentation: a retrospective comparative study10.1111/cid.70099 ↗
14. Engineered cell‐laden armor unit‐mimicking bioceramic granules for bone regeneration
15. 3D printing novel porous granule-type bioceramics via magnesium tuning biological performances beneficial for implantation and clinical translation10.1016/j.cej.2024.150401 ↗
16. Transformable carbonate apatite chains as a novel type of bone graft
17. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f ↗
18. Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: a review of current trends10.1002/jbm.b.33651 ↗
19. Evolution in bone tissue regeneration: from grafts to innovative biomaterials10.3390/ijms26094242 ↗
20. Review: bone tissue engineering: the role of interstitial fluid flow10.1002/bit.260430706 ↗
21. Fluid and solute transport in bone: flow-Induced mechanotransduction10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165136 ↗
22. Effect of angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering10.1007/s10439-022-02970-9 ↗
23. The role of vasculature and angiogenic strategies in bone regeneration10.3390/biomimetics9020075 ↗
24. Particle size of periodontal bone grafting materials10.1902/jop.1984.55.7.406 ↗
25. Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.388 ↗
26. Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087 ↗
27. Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore Sizes—Different cell effects10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
28. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
29. How does scaffold porosity conduct bone tissue regeneration?10.1002/adem.202100463 ↗
30. Cellular fluidics10.1038/s41586-021-03603-2 ↗
31. In vitro bone cell models: impact of fluid shear stress on bone formation10.3389/fbioe.2016.00087 ↗
32. Referencing to adventitious carbon in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: can differential charging explain C 1s peak shifts?10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154855 ↗
33. Mechanical properties of a new type of apatite-containing glass-ceramic for prosthetic application10.1007/BF01112282 ↗
34. Thermal and physical characterisation of apatite/wollastonite bioactive glass–ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.06.034 ↗
35. Khor · 2008
36. Topological interlocking as a material design concept10.1016/j.msec.2010.11.011 ↗
37. Strength, stability, and interlocking efficacy in topologically interlocked materials based on tetrahedra and octahedra10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113575 ↗
38. Numerical simulation of random close packing with tetrahedra10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/055 ↗
39. Principle of equivalency of bed structures and bed load motion10.1016/S1001-6279(12)60036-5 ↗
40. Numerical investigation of the angle of repose of monosized spheres10.1103/PhysRevE.64.021301 ↗
41. Observations of the effects of particle shape and particle size distribution on avalanching of granular media10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00815-4 ↗
42. Quantification of mechanisms governing the angle of repose, angle of tilting, and hausner ratio to estimate the flowability of particulate materials10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.012 ↗
43. Tissue engineered bone: measurement of nutrient transport in three-dimensional matrices10.1002/jbm.a.10111 ↗
44. CFD simulation on permeability of porous scaffolds for human skeletal system10.11113/humentech.v1n1.11 ↗
45. Permeability of porous gelcast scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1007/s10934-009-9331-2 ↗
46. The effect of tortuosity on permeability of porous scaffold10.3390/biomedicines11020427 ↗
47. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
48. Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: computational fluid dynamic analysis using newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.017 ↗
49. Influence of non-newtonian viscosity on flow structures and wall deformation in compliant serpentine microchannels: a numerical study10.3390/mi14091661 ↗
50. Porous ongrowth surfaces alter osteoblast maturation and mineralization10.1002/jbm.a.35140 ↗
51. Effect of microporosity on scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1093/rb/rby001 ↗
52. Geometry-based computational fluid dynamic model for predicting the biological behavior of bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.3390/jfb13030104 ↗
53. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.013 ↗
54. Regulation and role of transcription factors in osteogenesis10.3390/ijms22115445 ↗
55. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction10.1038/nature10137 ↗
56. Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone10.1039/C7TB00741H ↗
57. Antibiotic-loaded Sr-doped porous calcium phosphate granules as multifunctional bone grafts10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.001 ↗
58. 3D printed magnesium-doped β-TCP gyroid scaffold with osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation properties and bone regeneration capability in vivo10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212759 ↗
59. Size matters: effect of granule size of the bone graft substitute (herafill®) on bone healing using masquelet's induced membrane in a critical size defect model in the rat's femur10.1002/jbm.b.34495 ↗
60. The impact of deproteinized bovine bone particle size on histological and clinical bone healing outcomes in the augmented sinus: a randomized controlled clinical trial10.1111/cid.13083 ↗
61. High-resolution vat-photopolymerization of personalized bioceramic implants: new advances, regulatory hurdles, and key recommendations10.1080/09506608.2023.2194744 ↗
62. Applications of non-destructive testing techniques for post-process control of additively manufactured parts10.1080/17452759.2017.1357319 ↗
63. Conceptual design of compliant bone scaffolds by full-scale topology optimization10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105886 ↗
64. A review of computational optimization of bone scaffold architecture: methods, challenges, and perspectives
65. A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.023 ↗
66. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
67. Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease10.1242/dmm.033084 ↗
68. Changes in interstitial fluid flow, mass transport and the bone cell response in microgravity and normogravity10.1038/s41413-022-00234-9 ↗
69. Non-newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.016 ↗
70. The use of the photogrammetric method for measurement of the repose angle of granular materials10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.005 ↗
71. A comparative study of granular agglomeration between 3D printed hydroxyapatite and commercial bone graft granules10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.798.83 ↗
72. Chemical reaction of bioactive glass and glass-ceramics with a simulated body fluid10.1007/BF00705272 ↗
73. Osteoclastic resorption of apatite formed on apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic by a simulated body fluid10.1002/jbm.820281114 ↗
74. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research10.1111/bph.15193 ↗
75. Effectiveness of xenogeneic and synthetic bone-block substitute materials with/without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a preclinical study using a rabbit calvarium model10.1111/jcpe.13480 ↗
76. Efficacy of 3D ‐printed bioactive glass tetrahedral particles for vertical bone regeneration: a comparative study10.1002/jbm.a.37980 ↗