journal article·2026-07-28

B-MIDIA: A Belief-Structure Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Analyzing Citizens’ Perceptions of Digital Technologies in the European Union

Ewa Roszkowska

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Digital technologies are reshaping economies, labor markets, social security systems, and societal well-being across the European Union, increasing the need for decision-support methods capable of systematically analyzing complex survey evidence. This study proposes B-MIDIA, a parametric extension of the belief-structure TOPSIS framework that integrates the MIDIA (Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points) aggregation mechanism with belief-structure-based multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework preserves the ordinal structure of survey responses and follows the standard belief-structure representation adopted in B-TOPSIS, in which uncertain (“Don’t know”) responses are incorporated into the evaluation through the normalization procedure. Using published country-level response distributions from Special Eurobarometer 554, the study evaluates public perceptions of recent digital technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), across EU Member States in five domains: the economy, society, quality of life, current job, and social security benefits. Sensitivity analyses performed for alternative values of the aggregation parameter α, together with comparisons with the benchmark B-TOPSIS rankings, demonstrate the robustness of the proposed aggregation mechanism within the adopted belief-structure framework. Across most dimensions, Lithuania and Malta achieved the highest evaluations, whereas France, Italy, and Romania generally ranked among the lowest. Economic and employment-related evaluations formed the central perception structure and were strongly associated with quality-of-life assessments. The proposed framework extends the analytical capabilities of belief-structure TOPSIS by enabling systematic sensitivity analysis of aggregation assumptions while preserving methodological compatibility with the original framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Affiliations

Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

Funding

Bialystok University of Technology · Ministry of Science and Higher Education

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. Drago, C., Costantiello, A., Savorgnan, M., and Leogrande, A. (2025). Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach. Economies, 13.10.3390/economies13080226 ↗
2. Paradigm Shift: Exploring the Impact of Digital Technologies on the Welfare State through a Systematic Literature Review10.1111/spol.13054 ↗
3. Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research10.1177/21582440211047576 ↗
4. The Digital Economy and Its Implications for Labour. 2. The Consequences of Digitalisation for the Labour Market10.1177/1024258917714659 ↗
5. AI and Society: A Virtue Ethics Approach10.1007/s00146-022-01545-5 ↗
6. Embedding Artificial Intelligence in Society: Looking beyond the EU AI Master Plan Using the Culture Cycle10.1007/s00146-021-01383-x ↗
7. Digital Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777 ↗
8. Lynn, T., Rosati, P., Conway, E., Curran, D., Fox, G., and O’Gorman, C. (2022). Digital Public Services. Digital Towns: Accelerating and Measuring the Digital Transformation of Rural Societies and Economies, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-91247-5 ↗
9. (2026, January 26). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work—February 2025—Eurobarometer Survey. Available online: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3222?.
10. Babbie, E.R. (2020). The Practice of Social Research, Cengage.
11. Vaus, D.D., and Vaus, D.d. (2013). Surveys in Social Research, Routledge. [6th ed.].10.4324/9780203519196 ↗
12. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press.
13. Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y ↗
14. Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 ↗
15. A Synthetic Measure for Ranking Overall Satisfaction Based on Multidimensional Ordinal Data. The Case of Airlines on the TripAdvisor Website
16. Application of TOPSIS Methodology to the Scoring of Negotiation Issues Measured on the Ordinal Scale
17. Distance Measure for Ordinal Data
18. Jefmański, B., and Sagan, A. (2021). Item Response Theory Models for the Fuzzy TOPSIS in the Analysis of Survey Data. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13020223 ↗
19. The Sensitivity of the SERVQUAL Score to the Choice of the Fuzzy Conversion Scale
20. Computing with Words in Decision Support Systems: An Overview on Models and Applications
21. Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 ↗
22. Jefmański, B., Roszkowska, E., and Kusterka-Jefmańska, M. (2021). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure on the Basis of Survey Responses and Aggregated Ordinal Data. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23121636 ↗
23. Roszkowska, E., Kusterka-Jefmańska, M., and Jefmański, B. (2021). Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS as a Method for Assessing Socioeconomic Phenomena on the Basis of Survey Data. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23050563 ↗
24. Jefmański, B. (2019). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure for Ordinal Data. Proceedings of the Conference of the Section on Classification and Data Analysis of the Polish Statistical Association, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-52348-0_4 ↗
25. The Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure in a Dynamic Analysis of the Subjective Quality of Life of Citizens of European Cities10.34659/eis.2024.88.1.708 ↗
26. Roszkowska, E., and Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2026). A Dual-Dimensional Assessment of AI in Healthcare: Applications and Perceived Opportunities Across the WHO European Region. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16125863 ↗
27. TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making10.1007/s11633-010-0515-7 ↗
28. Roszkowska, E., and Wachowicz, T. (2024). Smart Cities and Resident Well-Being: Using the BTOPSIS Method to Assess Citizen Life Satisfaction in European Cities. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311051 ↗
29. Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T., and Michalska, E. (2025). Sustainable Cities and Quality of Life: A Multi-Criteria Approach for Evaluating Perceived Satisfaction with Public Administration. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su172210106 ↗
30. Wachowicz, T., Morais, D.C., and Ke, G.Y. (2026). Group Assessment of Overall Airline Customer Satisfaction from Online Reviews: A B-TOPSIS Approach. Proceedings of the Perspectives on Group Decision and Negotiation: Theory, Technology, and Practice, Springer Nature.
31. Roszkowska, E. (2025). Improving Survey Data Interpretation: A Novel Approach to Analyze Single-Item Ordinal Responses with Non-Response Categories. Information, 16.10.3390/info16070546 ↗
32. Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys10.1002/acp.2350050305 ↗
33. Sensitive Questions in Surveys10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 ↗
34. De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J., and Dillman, D. (2012). International Handbook of Survey Methodology, Routledge.10.4324/9780203843123 ↗
35. Roszkowska, E., and Wachowicz, T. (2026). Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS. Entropy, 28.10.3390/e28070759 ↗
36. Roszkowska, E., Filipowicz-Chomko, M., Górecka, D., and Majewska, E. (2025). Sustainable Cities and Communities in EU Member States: A Multi-Criteria Analysis. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17010022 ↗
37. Roszkowska, E., and Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2024). A Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16081025 ↗
38. Negotiation Offer Evaluation with MIDIA: Integrating Aspiration and Reservation Levels into Scoring System
39. Wachowicz, T., Morais, D.C., and Ke, G. (2026). MIDIA: A Dual-Reference Scoring Method for Multi-Issue Negotiation Support. Perspectives on Group Decision and Negotiation: Theory, Technology, and Practice, Springer. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.
40. A Comparative Study of Optimistic and Pessimistic Multicriteria Decision Analysis Based on Atanassov Fuzzy Sets10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.038 ↗
41. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill.
42. Hurwicz, L. (1951). The Generalized Bayes-Minimax Principle: A Criterion for Decision-Making Under Uncertainty, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics.
43. Kavoura, A., Gretzel, U., and Vrana, V. (2026). Navigating the Human Side of AI: Insights into Employee Attitudes, Risks, and Regional Variations. Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism, Springer Nature. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics.10.1007/978-3-032-12968-0 ↗
44. Digital Technologies, Innovation, and Skills: Emerging Trajectories and Challenges10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289 ↗
45. The Digital Economy: Challenges and Opportunities in the New Era of Technology and Electronic Communications10.1016/j.asej.2023.102411 ↗
46. Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth in European Countries: A Symmetric and Asymmetric Cointegration Based on Linear and Non-Linear ARDL Approach10.1186/s40008-024-00345-y ↗
47. Implications of AI Innovation on Economic Growth: A Panel Data Study10.1186/s40008-023-00307-w ↗
48. How to Realize the Full Potentials of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Digital Economy? A Literature Review10.1016/j.jdec.2022.11.003 ↗
49. Čišić, D., Drezgić, S., Buterin, V., Gržeta, I., Kovačić, B., Poščić, P., Molinari, F., and Misuraca, G.C. (2025). Semantic Mapping of AI-for-Government Research: Uncovering the Knowledge Architecture of Digital-Era Governance. Adm. Sci., 16.10.3390/admsci16010019 ↗
50. Digital Technology and Social Change: The Digital Transformation of Society from a Historical Perspective10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhilbert ↗
51. Adjusting to the Digital: Societal Outcomes and Consequences10.1016/j.respol.2021.104296 ↗
52. Nosratabadi, S., Atobishi, T., and HegedHus, S. (2023). Social Sustainability of Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from EU-27 Countries. Adm. Sci., 13.10.2139/ssrn.4459297 ↗
53. Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., and Ziefle, M. (2023). What Does the Public Think about Artificial Intelligence?—A Criticality Map to Understand Bias in the Public Perception of AI. Front. Comput. Sci., 5.10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903 ↗
54. Societal and Ethical Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: Critical Notes on European Policy Frameworks10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961 ↗
55. (2026, January 26). AI Act|Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai.
56. The Effects of Digital Inclusion and ICT Access on the Quality of Life: A Global Perspective10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101511 ↗
57. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 ↗
58. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: A Functional-Identity Perspective10.1177/09637214221091823 ↗
59. Artificial Intelligence for Quality of Life Study: A Systematic Literature Review10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3395369 ↗
60. The Impact of Digitalisation on European Citizens’ Daily Lives: Cross-Country Differences among Socio-Professional Categories10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103315 ↗
61. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work10.1007/s00146-024-01960-w ↗
62. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Employees’ Skills and Well-Being in Global Labor Markets: A Systematic Review
63. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work10.4000/rei.8727 ↗
64. The Work Affective Well-Being under the Impact of AI10.1038/s41598-024-75113-w ↗
65. Artificial Intelligence in Employee Recruitment10.1002/joe.22248 ↗
66. Collaboration among Recruiters and Artificial Intelligence: Removing Human Prejudices in Employment10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0 ↗
67. Oliveira, P., Carvalho, J.M.S., and Faria, S. (2025). AI Integration in Organisational Workflows: A Case Study on Job Reconfiguration, Efficiency, and Workforce Adaptation. Information, 16.10.3390/info16090764 ↗
68. Introduction: Social Security and the Digital Economy—Managing Transformation10.1111/issr.12211 ↗
69. Digitalisation and Social Security in the EU. The Case of Platform Work: From Work Protection to Income Protection?10.1177/1388262720971300 ↗
70. A Systematic Literature Review on Ai Based Recommendation Systems and Their Ethical Considerations10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3451054 ↗
71. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 ↗
72. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 ↗
73. AI in Knowledge Sharing, Which Ethical Challenges Are Raised in Decision-Making Processes for Organisations?10.1108/MD-10-2023-2023 ↗
74. (2026, February 01). Special Eurobarometer SP554: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s3222_101_4_sp554_eng?locale=en.
75. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (2026, June 24). Available online: https://www.gesis.org/en/eurobarometer-data-service/data-and-documentation/standard-special-eb/weighting-overview.
76. European Commission (2025). Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Eurobarometer Report, Publications Office.
77. (2026, January 26). Full Report: How Do People Experience New Technologies and Generative AI?. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/how-do-people-experience-new-technologies-and-generative-ai_49b8d10e-en/full-report.html.
78. (2026, January 26). European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER)|Safety and Health at Work EU-OSHA. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/facts-and-figures/esener?.
79. (2026, January 26). European Working Conditions Survey (2024). Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/surveys-and-data/surveys/european-working-conditions-survey/ewcs-2024/.
80. Ignacio, G.V., Enrique, F.M., Sally, W., and Davide, V. (2025). Digital Monitoring, Algorithmic Management and the Platformisation of Work in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union.
81. Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making Method with Dempster–Shafer Theory and Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets10.1155/2020/6537048 ↗
82. The Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence10.1007/978-3-7908-1811-6_6 ↗
83. Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 ↗
84. (2026, May 27). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI)|Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.
85. Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 ↗