journal article·2025-07-17

A Gravity Data Denoising Method Based on Multi-Scale Attention Mechanism and Physical Constraints Using U-Net

Bing Liu, Houpu Li, Shaofeng Bian, Chaoliang Zhang, Bing Ji, Yujie Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Gravity and gravity gradient data serve as fundamental inputs for geophysical resource exploration and geological structure analysis. However, traditional denoising methods—including wavelet transforms, moving averages, and low-pass filtering—exhibit signal loss and limited adaptability under complex, non-stationary noise conditions. To address these challenges, this study proposes an improved U-Net deep learning framework that integrates multi-scale feature extraction and attention mechanisms. Furthermore, a Laplace consistency constraint is introduced into the loss function to enhance denoising performance and physical interpretability. Notably, the datasets used in this study are generated by the authors, involving simulations of subsurface prism distributions with realistic density perturbations (±20% of typical rock densities) and the addition of controlled Gaussian noise (5%, 10%, 15%, and 30%) to simulate field-like conditions, ensuring the diversity and physical relevance of training samples. Experimental validation on these synthetic datasets and real field datasets demonstrates the superiority of the proposed method over conventional techniques. For noise levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 30% in test sets, the improved U-Net achieves Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratios (PSNR) of 59.13 dB, 52.03 dB, 48.62 dB, and 48.81 dB, respectively, outperforming wavelet transforms, moving averages, and low-pass filtering by 10–30 dB. In multi-component gravity gradient denoising, our method excels in detail preservation and noise suppression, improving Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) by 15–25%. Field data tests further confirm enhanced identification of key geological anomalies and overall data quality improvement. In summary, the improved U-Net not only delivers quantitative advancements in gravity data denoising but also provides a novel approach for high-precision geophysical data preprocessing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Affiliations

School of Electrical Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China

School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Funding

National Science Foundation for Key Program · Natural Science Foundation of China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Three Integrating Methods for Gravity and Gravity Gradient 3-D Inversion and Their Comparison Based on a New Function of Discrete Stability10.1109/TGRS.2021.3108459 ↗
2. 3D Inversion of Airborne Gravity Gradiometry Data in Mineral Exploration: A Case Study in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Brazil10.1190/geo2012-0106.1 ↗
3. Toward 1-mGal Accuracy in Global Marine Gravity from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and Jason-110.1190/tle32080892.1 ↗
4. Advancements in Satellite Gravity Gradient Data for Crustal Studies10.1190/tle32080900.1 ↗
5. Lithosphere Structure of Europe and Northern Atlantic from Regional Three-Dimensional Gravity Modelling10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01728.x ↗
6. Application of Extended Tilt Angle and Its 3D Euler Deconvolution to Gravity Data from the Longmenshan Thrust Belt and Adjacent Areas10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104769 ↗
7. Jircitano, A., White, J., and Dosch, D. (1990, January 5). Gravity Based Navigation of AUVs. Proceedings of the Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, Washington, DC, USA.
8. Using Gravity Anomaly Matching Techniques to Implement Submarine Navigation10.1002/cjg2.727 ↗
9. Affleck, C.A., and Jircitano, A. (1990, January 20). Passive Gravity Gradiometer Navigation System. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Position Location and Navigation. A Decade of Excellence in the Navigation Sciences, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
10. Joint Gravity and Gravity Gradient Inversion for Subsurface Object Detection10.1109/LGRS.2012.2226427 ↗
11. Method for Assessing the Three-Dimensional Density Structure Based on Gravity Gradient Inversion and Gravity Gradient Curvature10.1093/jge/gxac071 ↗
12. A Stable Method for Detecting the Edges of Potential Field Sources10.1109/TGRS.2024.3388294 ↗
13. Li, J., Chao, N., Li, H., Chen, G., Bian, S., Wang, Z., and Ma, A. (2024). Enhancing Bathymetric Prediction by Integrating Gravity and Gravity Gradient Data with Deep Learning. Front. Mar. Sci., 11.10.3389/fmars.2024.1520401 ↗
14. Airborne Gradiometry Error Analysis10.1007/s10712-005-3826-4 ↗
15. Gravity Gradiometer Survey Errors10.1190/1.1442414 ↗
16. Comparing Gravity and Gravity Gradient Surveys10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00900.x ↗
17. Performance of Airborne Gravity Gradiometers10.1190/tle32080908.1 ↗
18. Performance Estimate of Some Prototypes of Inertial Platform and Strapdown Marine Gravimeters10.1186/s40623-020-01219-w ↗
19. Liu, B., Bian, S., Ji, B., Wu, S., Xian, P., Chen, C., and Zhang, R. (2022). Application of the Fourier Series Expansion Method for the Inversion of Gravity Gradients Using Gravity Anomalies. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15010230 ↗
20. Real-Time Joint Filtering of Gravity and Gravity Gradient Data Based on Improved Kalman Filter10.1109/TGRS.2024.3452038 ↗
21. Pereira, T., Santos, V., Gameiro, T., Viegas, C., and Ferreira, N. (2024). Evaluation of Different Filtering Methods Devoted to Magnetometer Data Denoising. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13112006 ↗
22. FPWT: Filter Pruning via Wavelet Transform for CNNs10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106577 ↗
23. Spectral Analysis of Gravity Gradiometry Profiles10.1190/1.2169848 ↗
24. Hybrid Convolutional and Attention Network for Hyperspectral Image Denoising10.1109/LGRS.2024.3370299 ↗
25. High-Precision Intelligence Denoising of Potential Field Data Based on RevU-Net10.1109/LGRS.2023.3241295 ↗
26. A Stable Method for Estimating the Derivatives of Potential Field Data Based on Deep Learning
27. Higher-Order Gravitational Potential Gradients for Geoscientific Applications10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102937 ↗
28. PolyR-CNN: R-CNN for End-to-End Polygonal Building Outline Extraction10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.10.006 ↗
29. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014, January 14–16). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Banff, AB, Canada.
30. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
31. Mao, X.-J., Shen, C., and Yang, Y.-B. (2016, January 5–10). Image Restoration Using Very Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks with Symmetric Skip Connections. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
32. Bello, I., Zoph, B., Le, Q., Vaswani, A., and Shlens, J. (November, January 27). Attention Augmented Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00338 ↗
33. Andreoli, J. (2019). Convolution, Attention and Structure Embedding. arXiv.
34. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications. arXiv.