Spatial Identification and Network Vulnerability Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle Pick-Up Locations: A Data-Driven Complex Network Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
With the accelerating commercialization of autonomous driving technology, robotaxis have emerged as a significant force in reshaping urban transportation systems. However, their service efficiency and system resilience depend heavily on the spatial layout and network structure of pick-up points. Utilizing the Waymo Open Motion Dataset comprising 2,316,135 motion trajectories, this study proposes a multi-stage analytical framework to systematically identify autonomous vehicle pick-up points and evaluate the vulnerability of the constructed network. First, trajectories are stratified using kinematic criteria, and K-Means clustering is applied to 12 kinematic and geometric features to distinguish genuine pick-up and drop-off (PUDO) events from traffic-related stops. The identified pick-up points are then aggregated into spatial grid nodes to construct an undirected, unweighted network. Finally, network vulnerability is assessed by simulating random failures and three types of targeted attacks. The findings reveal that: (1) identifies 21,503 candidate pick-up points exhibiting pronounced curbside-departure characteristics from 111,321 stop-to-go trajectories. (2) The network exhibits global sparsity and high local clustering; the largest connected component (LCC) encompasses 66.1% of nodes, forming a primary service area covering the urban core, while the remaining 33.9% are scattered across 377 isolated fragments. (3) The network demonstrates strong robustness against random failures but is highly vulnerable to targeted attacks on high-betweenness centrality nodes. Removing merely the top 5% of such nodes reduces the LCC to 36.7%, and at 20% removal the LCC drops to 3.5% with near-complete loss of global efficiency. This study contributes a reproducible, machine learning-based methodology for extracting pick-up points from trajectory data and reveals structural vulnerabilities in autonomous driving service networks from a complex network perspective, providing quantitative evidence for enhancing the resilience of future urban intelligent transportation systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
School of Geographical Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO 63130, USA
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles on urban transportation and environment: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.scs.2023.104649 ↗
2. Butilă, E.V., Voinea, G.-D., Boboc, R.G., and Ambrosi, G. (2026). Autonomous Vehicles in the Traffic Ecosystem: A Comprehensive Review of Integration, Impacts, and Policy Implications. Vehicles, 8.10.3390/vehicles8020041 ↗
3. Regulating Robotaxis
4. Balancing energy resilience and mobility: A multi-objective strategy for deploying shared autonomous electric vehicles during power outages10.1038/s44333-026-00081-9 ↗
5. Vulnerability and resilience analysis of road network: A systematic literature review using Bibliometrix10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101142 ↗
6. Integrating trajectory data and demographic characteristics: A trajectory semantic model for predicting travel flow and conducting interaction analysis10.1080/17538947.2024.2392842 ↗
7. Spatial distribution of ride-hailing trip demand and its association with walkability and neighborhood characteristics10.1016/j.cities.2020.102926 ↗
8. Planning shared mobility hubs in European cities: A methodological framework using MCDA and GIS applied to Barcelona10.1016/j.scs.2024.105377 ↗
9. Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 ↗
10. An integrated optimisation framework for locating depots in shared autonomous vehicle systems
11. Network-based pick-up and drop-off location optimization for shared autonomous vehicles10.1007/s44212-025-00073-z ↗
12. Mobility trajectory generation: A survey10.1007/s10462-023-10598-x ↗
13. Liu, M., Yurtsever, E., Fossaert, J., Zhou, X., Zimmer, W., Cui, Y., and Knoll, A.C. (2024). A Survey on Autonomous Driving Datasets: Statistics, Annotation Quality, and a Future Outlook. arXiv.10.1109/TIV.2024.3394735 ↗
14. Rivera-Campoverde, N.D., Bermeo Naula, A.K., Arenas Ramírez, B.D.V., and Rodas, D.I.O. (2026). Smart Mobility Analytics: Inferring Transport Modes and Sustainability Metrics from GPS Data and Machine Learning. Atmosphere, 17.10.3390/atmos17030246 ↗
15. MobilityDL: A review of deep learning from trajectory data10.1007/s10707-024-00518-8 ↗
16. Wang, K., Pang, L., and Li, X. (2023). Identification of Stopping Points in GPS Trajectories by Two-Step Clustering Based on DPCC with Temporal and Entropy Constraints. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23073749 ↗
17. An adaptive trajectory segmentation and simplification algorithm based on vessel behavioral features10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119329 ↗
18. Vehicular traffic management based on traffic engineering for vehicular ad hoc networks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978700 ↗
19. Le Cam, L.M., and Neyman, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press. Volume 1: Theory of Statistics.
20. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 ↗
21. Du, X., Kang, X., Gao, Y., and Wang, X. (2024). Driving behavior characterization and traffic emission analysis considering the vehicle trajectory. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1341611 ↗
22. An analysis of the vulnerability of road networks in response to disruption events through accessibility indicators specification10.1080/03081060.2024.2329650 ↗
23. Rashid, N.U., and Chan, K.T. (2023). A Review on Transportation Network based on Complex Network Approach. arXiv.
24. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks10.1038/35019019 ↗
25. Zhu, T., Li, H., Wu, Y., Jiang, Y., Pan, J., and Dai, Z. (2025). Resilience Assessment of Urban Bus–Metro Hybrid Networks in Flood Disasters: A Case Study of Zhengzhou, China. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17104591 ↗
26. Machine Learning driven complex network analysis of transport systems10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104270 ↗
27. Zhu, T., Liu, J., Song, C., Miao, X., and Zhu, S. (2025). A Novel Centrality-Based Attack Simulation: Evaluating Resilience and Vulnerability in China’s Knowledge Networks. Systems, 13.10.3390/systems13050350 ↗
28. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness10.2307/3033543 ↗
29. Ettinger, S., Cheng, S., Caine, B., Liu, C., Zhao, H., Pradhan, S., Chai, Y., Sapp, B., Qi, C., and Zhou, Y. (2021, January 10–17). Large scale interactive motion forecasting for autonomous driving: The waymo open motion dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00957 ↗
30. Newman, M.E.J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.003.0001 ↗
31. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 ↗
32. Wang, Z., Ning, J., and Gao, M. (2024). Complex Network Model of Global Financial Time Series Based on Different Distance Functions. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12142210 ↗
33. The complexity and robustness of metro networks10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.008 ↗
34. Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network, in China10.1016/j.physa.2011.06.022 ↗
35. Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.008 ↗
36. Attack vulnerability of complex networks10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056109 ↗
37. Iyer, S., Killingback, T., Sundaram, B., and Wang, Z. (2013). Attack robustness and centrality of complex networks. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0059613 ↗