A Novel Rate of Penetration Prediction Model Integrating Log-Derived Geomechanical Properties and Physically Motivated Energy Parameters for Heterogeneous Formations
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate rate of penetration (ROP) prediction in heterogeneous formations remains a key challenge for drilling optimization, as existing empirical models rely on fixed-structure coefficients unable to adapt to rapid lithological transitions. This study presents a novel exponential-form ROP model integrating surface drilling parameters (weight on bit (W), rotary speed (N), torque (T), and standpipe pressure (SPP)), log-derived geomechanical properties (dynamic combined compressibility modulus for carbonates; total porosity for sandstones), and three physically motivated energy parameters: rotational mechanical power per unit bit area (Prot), axial crushing energy (AE/AEs), and hydraulic cleaning efficiency (Hce). Bit wear is quantified through a modified Hareland and Hoberock wear function requiring no laboratory measurements. Parameter selection used combined Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis across 16 candidate variables from a raw dataset of 9375 depth readings for Well A and 4443 for Well B (at 0.25 m intervals). The model was developed using nonlinear least squares regression (Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm) in MATLAB. Validated on two vertical wells penetrating mixed carbonate and clastic sequences in a Middle Eastern offshore field and benchmarked against four classical formulations, the model achieves R2 = 0.6568–0.6766 across full heterogeneous sections, improving on the best benchmark by margins of 0.36–0.46. Under lithology-specific calibration, R2 advances to 0.8239–0.9139, with MAPE reducing to 5.71%. The model is limited to two vertical wells in a single field; further field validation is recommended before broader deployment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. Box 800, Saudi Arabia
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Two-level intelligent modeling method for the rate of penetration in complex geological drilling process10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.020 ↗
2. Prediction of drilling rate of penetration (ROP) using hybrid support vector regression: A case study on the Shennongjia area, Central China10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106200 ↗
3. A New Hybrid Bat Algorithm and its Application to the ROP Optimization in Drilling Processes10.1109/TII.2019.2943165 ↗
4. A novel rate of penetration prediction model with identified condition for the complex geological drilling process10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.02.001 ↗
5. Detection of downhole incidents for complex geological drilling processes using amplitude change detection and dynamic time warping10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.04.002 ↗
6. Fault diagnosis based on feature clustering of time series data for loss and kick of drilling process10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.03.004 ↗
7. Observer-based control of vertical penetration rate in rotary drilling systems10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.08.016 ↗
8. Bourgoyne, A.T., Millheim, K.K., Chenevert, M.E., and Young, F.S. (1986). Applied Drilling Engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers.10.2118/9781555630010 ↗
9. Realtime Rate of Penetration Optimization Using the Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm10.1115/1.4028696 ↗
10. Vibration Analysis of a Drillstring in Vibration-Assisted Rotary Drilling: Finite Element Modeling With Analytical Validation10.1115/1.4023333 ↗
11. Adaptive and Real-Time Optimal Control of Stick–Slip and Bit Wear in Autonomous Rotary Steerable Drilling10.1115/1.4038131 ↗
12. Akgun, F. (2002, January 13–16). How to Etimate the Maximum Achievable Drilling Rate without Jeopardizing Safety. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/78567-MS ↗
13. Prediction and analysis of penetration rate in drilling operation using deterministic and metaheuristic optimization methods10.1007/s13202-021-01394-w ↗
14. An estimation of the penetration rate of rotary drills using the Specific Rock Mass Drillability index10.1016/j.ijmst.2011.09.001 ↗
15. Reverse Engineering: A New Well Monitoring and Analysis Methodology Approaching Playing-Back Drill-Rate Tests in Real-Time for Drilling Optimization10.1115/1.4033067 ↗
16. Rate of penetration modeling using hybridization extreme learning machine and whale optimization algorithm10.1007/s12145-020-00524-y ↗
17. Graham, J.W., and Muench, N.L. (1959, January 4–7). Analytical Determination of Optimum Bit Weight and Rotary Speed Combinations. Proceedings of the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2118/1349-G ↗
18. The “Perfect—Cleaning” Theory of Rotary Drilling10.2118/408-PA ↗
19. Bingham, M.G. (1965). A New Approach to Interpreting—Rock Drillability, Petroleum Publishing Company. Technical Manual Reprint.
20. Microbit Studies of the Effect of Fluid Properties and Hydraulics on Drilling Rate10.2118/1520-PA ↗
21. A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection10.2118/4238-PA ↗
22. Eren, T., and Ozbayoglu, M.E. (2011, January 23–25). Real-Time Drilling Rate Of Penetration Performance Monitoring. Proceedings of the Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy.
23. Penetration-Rate Performance of Roller-Cone Bits10.2118/13259-PA ↗
24. Field Verification of Drilling Models and Computerized Selection off Drill Bit, WOB, and Drillstring Rotation10.2118/19130-PA ↗
25. Hareland, G., and Rampersad, P.R. (1994, January 27–29). Drag—Bit Model Including Wear. Proceedings of the SPE Latin America/Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina.10.2118/26957-MS ↗
26. Improved Drilling Efficiency Technique Using Integrated PDM and PDC Bit Parameters10.2118/141651-PA ↗
27. Hareland, G., Wu, A., and Rashidi, B. (2010, January 8–10). A Drilling Rate Model for Roller Cone Bits and Its Application. Proceedings of the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China.10.2118/129592-MS ↗
28. Theoretical and experimental study on the penetration rate for roller cone bits based on the rock dynamic strength and drilling parameters10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.019 ↗
29. A Robust Rate of Penetration Model for Carbonate Formation
30. Evaluation of PDC bit ROP models and the effect of rock strength on model coefficients10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.012 ↗
31. Atashnezhad, A., Akhtarmanesh, S., Sleeper, S., and Hareland, G. (July, January 28). Rate of Penetration (ROP) Model for PDC Drill Bits based on Cutter Rock Interaction. Proceedings of the 54th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Virtual.
32. Akhtarmanesh, S., Atashnezhad, A., Hareland, G., and Al Dushaishi, M. (2021, January 18–25). ROP Model for PDC Bits in Geothermal Drilling. Proceedings of the 55th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Virtual.
33. Mayibeki, D.N. (2025). Novel Rate of Penetration (ROP) Model for Hard Rock Drilling with Application to Geothermal Drilling. [Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State University]. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/novel-rate-penetration-rop-model-hard-rock/docview/3251650821/se-2?accountid=44936.
34. Jahanbakhshi, R., Keshavarzi, R., and Jafarnezhad, A. (2012, January 24–27). Real-time Prediction of Rate of Penetration During Drilling Operation In Oil And Gas Wells. Proceedings of the 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, IL, USA.
35. Computational intelligence based prediction of drilling rate of penetration: A comparative study10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.027 ↗
36. An investigation into the effect of geomechanical properties of reservoir rock on drilling parameters—A case study10.1007/s12517-021-08168-y ↗
37. Estimation of geomechanical rock characteristics from specific energy data using combination of wavelet transform with ANFIS-PSO algorithm10.1007/s13202-023-01644-z ↗
38. Machine learning classification approaches to optimize ROP and TOB using drilling and geomechanical parameters in a carbonate reservoir10.1007/s13202-024-01769-9 ↗
39. Saad, A., Taman, A., Reda, D., Yehia, T., Keshinro, O., Meehan, N., and Okoroafor, E.R. (2025, January 2–5). Enhancing Geothermal Drilling Performance: Predicting Rate of Penetration with Machine Learning Utilizing Geomechanical and Petrophysical Data. Proceedings of the SPE Offshore Europe Conference & Exhibition, Aberdeen, UK.10.2118/226760-MS ↗
40. Laboratory Study of Effect of Overburden, Formation and Mud Column Pressures on Drilling Rate of Permeable Formations10.2118/1094-G ↗
41. Galle, E.M., and Woods, H.B. (1963). Best Constant Weight and Rotary Speed for rotary Rock Bits. Drill. Prod. Pract.
42. Drilling Model for Soft-Formation Bits10.2118/8438-PA ↗
43. Walker, B.H., Black, A.D., Klauber, W.P., Little, T., and Khodaverdian, M. (1986, January 5–8). Roller-Bit Penetration Rate Response as a Function of Rock Properties and Well Depth. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2118/15620-MS ↗
44. Winters, W.J., Warren, T.M., and Onyia, E.C. (1987, January 27–30). Roller Bit Model with Rock Ductility and Cone Offset. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2118/16696-MS ↗
45. Hareland, G., and Hoberock, L.L. (1993, January 23–25). Use of Drilling Parameters to Predict In-Situ Stress Bounds. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.2118/25727-MS ↗
46. Hareland, G., Wu, A., Rashidi, B., and James, J. (2010, January 27–30). A New Drilling Rate Model for Tricone Bits and Its Application to Predict Rock Compressive Strength. Proceedings of the 44th US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
47. Prediction of Penetration Rate for PDC Bits Using Indices of Rock Drillability, Cuttings Removal, and Bit Wear10.2118/204231-PA ↗
48. Development of a modified Bourgoyne and Young model for predicting drilling rate10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108994 ↗
49. Alhalboosi, A.S., AlAwad, M.N.J., Altawati, F.S., Khamis, M.A., and Almobarky, M.A. (2026). Optimal Geomechanical Parameter Selection for Enhanced ROP Modeling: A Systematic Field-Based Comparative Study. Processes, 14.10.3390/pr14101646 ↗
50. Novel semi-analytical model for estimating unconfined compressive strength in sandstone reservoirs: Implications for CO2 sequestration10.1016/j.nxener.2026.100562 ↗