Assessment of the Possibility of Using Turning as a Post-Processing Method for Parts Manufactured by MEX Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing enables rapid prototyping, the production of complex geometries, and a reduction in production costs, which contributes to its widespread use in engineering. Despite the numerous advantages of additive technologies, limitations still exist regarding the dimensional and geometric accuracy of manufactured parts, particularly in MEX technology. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of using subtractive machining as a post-processing method to improve the accuracy of 3D-printed parts. Cylindrical samples were manufactured using the MEX method with specified process parameters and then subjected to turning. As part of the research, an analysis of the diameter and roundness deviations was conducted before and after the machining process. The results showed a clear reduction in geometric deviations and an improvement in dimensional accuracy after turning. The findings indicate that subtractive machining can effectively compensate for inaccuracies resulting from the nature of the additive manufacturing process. The turning process reduced the sample diameter by up to 7.04%, as intended, while improving geometric accuracy by reducing the roundness error by up to 95.76%, depending on the printing orientation and cutting parameters. As a result, turning can serve as a method for the final machining of components manufactured using MEX technology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, al. Tysiaclecia Panstwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
Funding
National Centre for Research and Development
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Budzik, G., Woźniak, J., and Przeszłowski, Ł. (2022). Market Analysis and Development Trends in 3D Printing, Rzeszów University of Technology Publishing House.
2. Budzik, G., Tomaszewski, K., and Soboń, A. (2022). Opportunities for the Application of 3D Printing in the Critical Infrastructure System. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15051656 ↗
3. Applications of 3D Printers in Industr
4. Dizon, J.R.C., Gache, C.C.L., Cascolan, H.M.S., Cancino, L.T., and Advincula, R.C. (2021). Post-Processing of 3D-Printed Polymers. Technologies, 9.10.3390/technologies9030061 ↗
5. Nowakowski, L., Bronis, M., Blasiak, S., and Skrzyniarz, M. (2025). A Method for Determining the Minimum Thickness of the Cut Layer in Precision Milling. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18010189 ↗
6. Blasiak, S., Bochnia, J., Takosoglu, J., Kozior, T., Nowakowski, L., Skrzyniarz, M., Krzysztofik, I., Blasiak, M., Dindorf, R., and Wos, P. (2024). 3D/4D Printing in Advanced Robotics Systems—Recent Developments and Applications. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162411174 ↗
7. AlFaify, A.Y. (2025). Experimental Evaluation of Milling Post-Processing on the Surface Quality of MEX-Printed Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PLA Composites. Machines, 13.10.3390/machines13111049 ↗
8. Effect of Post-Processing on the Dimensional Accuracy of Small Plastic Additive Manufactured Parts10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0153 ↗
9. Effect of Shells Number and Machining on Selected Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Samples10.14314/polimery.2024.3.6 ↗
10. Moradi, M., Karami Moghadam, M., Shamsborhan, M., Bodaghi, M., and Falavandi, H. (2020). Post-Processing of FDM 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid Parts by Laser Beam Cutting. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12030550 ↗
11. Kozior, T., Bochnia, J., Zmarzły, P., Gogolewski, D., and Mathia, T.G. (2020). Waviness of Freeform Surface Characterizations from Austenitic Stainless Steel (316L) Manufactured by 3D Printing-Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Technology. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13194372 ↗
12. Fused Deposition Modeling: Examination of the Flatness and Surface Topography of Thin-Wall Models Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
13. Design Guidelines for Plastic Casting Using 3D Printing
14. Skrzyniarz, M., Nowakowski, L., Miko, E., and Borkowski, K. (2021). Influence of Relative Displacement on Surface Roughness in Longitudinal Turning of X37CrMoV5-1 Steel. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14051317 ↗
15. Nowakowski, L., Skrzyniarz, M., Blasiak, S., and Bartoszuk, M. (2020). Influence of the Cutting Strategy on the Temperature and Surface Flatness of the Workpiece in Face Milling. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13204542 ↗
16. Nowakowski, L., Rolek, J., Blasiak, S., and Skrzyniarz, M. (2024). The Influence of Insert Mounting Errors on the Surface Roughness of 1.0503 Steel in Face Milling. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17246144 ↗
17. Piotrowski, A., and Tyliszczak, A. (2024). Profile Optimisation of a Solid Modular Hob in the Machining of Gears Made of Classic and Unusual, Innovative Materials. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17092049 ↗
18. Horava, C., Reznicek, M., and Ovsik, M. (2024). Influence of the Number of Inserts Used for Face Milling on Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17246052 ↗
19. 3D Printing for the Rapid Prototyping of Structural Electronics10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810 ↗
20. Skrzyniarz, M., Nowakowski, L., and Blasiak, S. (2022). Geometry, Structure and Surface Quality of a Maraging Steel Milling Cutter Printed by Direct Metal Laser Melting. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15030773 ↗
21. Nowakowski, L., Blasiak, S., and Skrzyniarz, M. (2023). Influence of the Relative Displacements and the Minimum Chip Thickness on the Surface Texture in Shoulder Milling. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16247661 ↗
22. MakerBot Industries, LLC (2016). MakerBot PLA Filament Technical Specifications, MakerBot Industries, LLC.. Available online: https://www.makerbot.com/stories/everything-you-need-to-know-about-pla-3d-printing/.
23. (2019). Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials (Standard No. ASTM D790).
24. (2024). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (Standard No. ASTM D638).
25. (2024). Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics (Standard No. ASTM D256).
26. Interfacial Weaknesses in Multi-Material FFF Sandwich Structures with TPMS Cores: A Comparative Study of PLA and PLA-CF Facesheets10.1007/s00170-025-16884-y ↗
27. Tao, Q., Fu, B., and Zhong, F. (2025). A Review of Challenges and Future Perspectives for High-Speed Material Extrusion Technology. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152212176 ↗
28. Evaluation of Machinability and Surface Quality Enhancement of Material Extrusion Fabricated Polylactic Acid Cylinders through Lathe Machining Parameters
29. (2011). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Roundness—Part 1: Vocabulary and Parameters of Roundness (Standard No. ISO 12181-1:2011).
30. (2011). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Roundness—Part 2: Specification Operators (Standard No. ISO 12181-2:2011).
31. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 3: Specification Operators (Standard No. ISO 21920-3:2021).
32. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (Standard No. ISO 21920-2:2021).
33. Carta, M., Loi, G., El Mehtedi, M., Buonadonna, P., and Aymerich, F. (2025). Improving Surface Roughness of FDM-Printed Parts Through CNC Machining: A Brief Review. J. Compos. Sci., 9.10.3390/jcs9060296 ↗