Size-dependent surface energy density of typically fcc metallic nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
The surface energy density of nano-sized structural elements exhibits an obvious size-dependent feature. To study this interesting phenomenon, atomistic calculations are carried out in the present paper for different face-centered-cubic (fcc) metallic nano-slabs. Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions are adopted, respectively, in order to find the varying trends of surface energy densities in an initially un-deformed configuration and a current one. It is found that the Lagrangian surface energy density increases monotonically with an increase of the nano-slab's thickness in the former no matter what the surface orientation is; while the variation of the Eulerian one is indefinite. The surface relaxation parameters are further simulated for differently oriented surfaces, which gives a very good explanation for the differences between the Lagrangian and Eulerian surface energy densities. The results in this paper should be a useful supplement to theoretical studies on the surface/interface effect of nanomaterials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Gleiter · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00285-2 ↗
2. Roduner · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2006 · 35 · 58310.1039/b502142c ↗
3. Ibach · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 1997 · 29 · 19510.1016/S0167-5729(97)00010-1 ↗
4. Muller · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2004 · 54 · 15710.1016/j.surfrep.2004.05.001 ↗
5. Dingreville · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2005 · 53 · 182710.1016/j.jmps.2005.02.012 ↗
6. Miao · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 8717
7. Liang · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 1
8. Gibbs · 1928
9. Shuttleworth · Proc. R. Soc. Sec. A · 1950 · 63 · 44410.1088/0370-1298/63/5/302 ↗
10. Vermaak · Surf. Sci. · 1968 · 12 · 12810.1016/0039-6028(68)90118-0 ↗
11. Gurtin · Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. · 1975 · 57 · 29110.1007/BF00261375 ↗
12. Gurtin · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1978 · 14 · 43110.1016/0020-7683(78)90008-2 ↗
13. Steigmann · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1997 · 453 · 85310.1098/rspa.1997.0047 ↗
14. Chhapadia · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2011 · 59 · 210310.1016/j.jmps.2011.06.007 ↗
15. Nix · Scripta Mater. · 1998 · 39 · 165310.1016/S1359-6462(98)00352-2 ↗
16. Huang · Acta Mech. · 2006 · 182 · 19510.1007/s00707-005-0286-3 ↗
17. Vitos · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 411 · 18610.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X ↗
18. Shenoy · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 9410410.1103/PhysRevB.71.094104 ↗
19. Miller · Nanotechnology · 2000 · 11 · 13910.1088/0957-4484/11/3/301 ↗
20. Mi · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.77.075425 ↗
21. Sheng · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 13411810.1103/PhysRevB.83.134118 ↗
22. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 314310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00232-4 ↗
23. Ouyang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 9191410.1063/1.2172396 ↗
24. Ouyang · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 04570910.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045709 ↗
25. Liang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 8431710.1063/1.3501090 ↗
26. Johnson · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 392410.1103/PhysRevB.37.3924 ↗
27. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
28. Streitz · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1069910.1103/PhysRevB.49.10699 ↗
29. Luo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 235910.1021/jp0770155 ↗
30. Song · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 255 · 570210.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.062 ↗
31. Diao · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2004 · 52 · 193510.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.009 ↗