Thermal Aging Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Epoxy Nanocomposites Characteristics
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the thermal aging of glass fiber reinforced epoxy nanocomposites, focusing on chemical degradation mechanisms and the mitigating role of thermal conductivity for high‐temperature low‐sag conductor core applications. Composites with hybrid nanofillers containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes, graphene nanoplatelets, and aluminum trihydrate were aged at 120°C and 160°C for 3000 h. Thermal aging induced chemical degradation, with a 10‐fold increase in oxidation rate at 160°C due to chain scission. Carbonyl formation and hydroperoxide intermediates were formed in the composites. Tensile strength reduction of 8.6% in base composites is observed compared to 6.5% in the nanocomposite with hybrid nanofillers. Hybrid nanofillers reduce degradation by limiting oxygen diffusion, cooling the matrix, and stabilizing T g , outperforming literature‐reported reductions of 7%–12% for similar composites. Thermal conductivity, modeled using Maxwell–Garnett, shows an enhancement of 40%–60% with nanofiller content and 10%–20% in the Bruggeman model. This slows heat diffusion, further mitigating aging. Transient heat flow analysis confirmed a 20%–30% longer diffusion time enhancing thermal stability. The nanocomposite retained 474.56 MPa tensile strength post‐aging, meeting high‐temperature low‐sag (HTLS) conductor standards. These findings elucidate the interplay between thermal aging, chemical degradation, and thermal conductivity, highlighting the potential of hybrid nanofillers for durable HTLS applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Siddaganga Institute of Technology Tumakuru Karnataka India
Visvesvaraya Technological University Belagavi India
Funding
Siddaganga Institute of Technology
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.775524110.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7755241 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10473510.1016/j.rineng.2025.104735 ↗
3. 10.1109/TR.2015.242789410.1109/TR.2015.2427894 ↗
4. 10.1163/156856111X59364910.1163/156856111X593649 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma904026210.3390/ma9040262 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.02110.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.021 ↗
7. 10.1080/15685551.2019.156566410.1080/15685551.2019.1565664 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.047 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.015 ↗
10. 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐92567‐7_2410.1007/978‐3‐319‐92567‐7_24 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 ↗
12. 10.1109/TDEI.2022.316406410.1109/TDEI.2022.3164064 ↗
13. 10.3762/bjnano.8.20310.3762/bjnano.8.203 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10973‐022‐11851‐110.1007/s10973‐022‐11851‐1 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1505118910.3390/polym15051189 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11281410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112814 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.5523410.1002/app.55234 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2754310.1002/pc.27543 ↗
19. 10.1016/0266‐3538(87)90071‐610.1016/0266‐3538(87)90071‐6 ↗
20. S.NuchprayoonandA.Chaichana “Cost Evaluation of Current Uprating of Overhead Transmission Lines Using ACSR and HTLS Conductors ” Conference Proceedings—2017 17th IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 1st IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe EEEIC / I and CPS Europe 2017 (2017) 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2017.7977606.10.1109/EEEIC.2017.7977606 ↗
21. Power System Engineering & Technology Department Central Electricity Authority “Guidelines for Rationalised Use of High‐Performance Conductors ”(2009) 162.
22. 10.1002/pc.2306510.1002/pc.23065 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2324510.1002/pc.23245 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2830610.1002/pc.28306 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41428‐024‐00979‐610.1038/s41428‐024‐00979‐6 ↗
26. 10.1080/01694243.2024.235803710.1080/01694243.2024.2358037 ↗
27. 10.1002/vnl.2208410.1002/vnl.22084 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.026 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym903009410.3390/polym9030094 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.04.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.04.017 ↗
31. 10.1080/01694243.2019.159589010.1080/01694243.2019.1595890 ↗
32. 10.1155/2013/56540110.1155/2013/565401 ↗
33. 10.1177/152808371987447910.1177/1528083719874479 ↗
34. 10.1177/073168441559684610.1177/0731684415596846 ↗
35. 10.3390/pr1001004010.3390/pr10010040 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.53310.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.533 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-3-031-63909-8_810.1007/978-3-031-63909-8_8 ↗
38. Haddadi S. · 2023 · 1
39. 10.1080/25740881.2023.224039310.1080/25740881.2023.2240393 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.03.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2009.03.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.epsr.2024.11125110.1016/j.epsr.2024.111251 ↗
43. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.306544710.1109/JSEN.2021.3065447 ↗
44. 10.1109/TDEI.2005.151109210.1109/TDEI.2005.1511092 ↗
45. S. T. Method “iTeh Standards iTeh Standards Document Preview ”(2000) 8 3–4 https://doi.org/10.1520/C1709‐18.10.1520/C1709 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10795810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107958 ↗
47. 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.84873610.1109/TPWRD.2005.848736 ↗
48. ASTM · 2014 · 1
49. E.Mateescu D.Marginean G.Florea S. I. A.Gal andC.Matea “Reconductoring Using HTLS Conductors. Case Study for a 220 kV Double Circuit Transmission LINE in Romania ”inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Transmission and Distribution Construction and Live Line Maintenance ESMO (2011) 1–7 https://doi.org/10.1109/TDCLLM.2011.6042242.10.1109/TDCLLM.2011.6042242 ↗