Some notes on gradient, volumetric and weakest link concepts in fatigue
Source abstract
Abstract
After pointing out possible higher-order effects of non-linear stress distributions in the vicinity of stress concentrators on fatigue stress predictions, a rigorous treatment of the effects of size and type of loading is given for the simple case of unnotched cylindrical specimens of different size loaded in tension/compression (TC), rotating bending (RB), and alternating axial bending (AB), comparing the predictive capabilities of gradient, volumetric (highly stressed volume), and weakest link (Weibull) concepts. It is shown that volumetric and weakest link concepts give qualitatively the same predictions; quantitative differences are highlighted. Also, an empirical modification of the volumetric concept is proposed to capture the experimentally observed saturation value of the fatigue strength for very large loaded volumes. Formulae for an easy determination of the model parameters as well as relations between the parameters of the different concepts are derived.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. G. Toplack, W. Eichlseder, I. Gódor, H. Leitner, in: Proceedings of the Cumulative Fatigue Damage, Sevilla, 2003.
2. Radaj · 2003
3. Notch sensitivity
4. DIN 743, Tragfähigkeitsberechnung von Wellen und Achsen (German Standard 743: Shafts and axles, calculation of load capacity), Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
5. FKM, Analytical Strength Assessment, fifth ed., VDMA Verlag, 2003.
6. Ciavarella · Int. J. Fatigue · 2004 · 26 · 28910.1016/S0142-1123(03)00106-3 ↗
7. W. Eichlseder, H. Leitner, in: Proceedings of the New Trends in Fatigue and Fracture, Metz, 2002.
8. Neuber · Konstruktion · 1968 · 20 · 245
9. Taylor · Int. J. Fatigue · 1999 · 21 · 41310.1016/S0142-1123(99)00007-9 ↗
10. Creager · Int. J. Fract. · 1967 · 3 · 24710.1007/BF00182890 ↗
11. Filippi · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2002 · 39 · 454310.1016/S0020-7683(02)00342-6 ↗
12. Niemann · 1981
13. Kuguel · Proc. ASTM · 1961 · 61 · 732
14. Sonsino · Konstruktion · 1993 · 45 · 25
15. Sonsino · Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech. · 2005 · 36 · 63210.1002/mawe.200500932 ↗
16. Lin · Int. J. Fatigue · 1998 · 20 · 30110.1016/S0142-1123(97)00134-5 ↗
17. J. Boehm, Zur Vorhersage von Dauerschwingfestigkeiten ungekerbter und gekerbter Bauteile unter Beruecksichtigung des statistischen Groesseneinflusses (On fatigue strength prediction of unnotched and notched components accounting for the statistical size effect, in German). Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Munich, 1980.
18. Makkonen · Int. J. Fatigue · 2003 · 25 · 1710.1016/S0142-1123(02)00053-1 ↗
19. Taylor · Int. J. Fatigue · 2003 · 25 · 77910.1016/S0142-1123(03)00057-4 ↗
20. Makkonen · Int. J. Fatigue · 2003 · 25 · 78110.1016/S0142-1123(03)00058-6 ↗
21. W. Weibull, Proc. Royal Swedish Inst. Eng. Res. 151 (1939).
22. Lu · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 85 · 164010.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00330.x ↗
23. Gross · 2001
24. Delahay · Int. J. Fatigue · 2006 · 28 · 47410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.048 ↗
25. Afferrante · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2006 · 43 · 514710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.002 ↗