Using the interface Peclet number to select the maximum simulation interface width in phase-field solidification modelling
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the use of interface Peclet number P = w/(Dl/Vtip), to determine the interface width (w) used in phase-field simulations, where Dl is the liquid diffusivity and Vtip is the tip velocity. The maximum simulation interface width (wmax) under varied growth conditions was analysed via convergence analysis and it was found that there is a limit of P for the maximum interface width at various velocities. Converged results can be obtained only when w < wmax = 0.075Dl/Vmax where Vmax is the maximum growth velocity during transient solidification. The effect of the inclusion of finite solid diffusivity on the P limit in selecting wmax was analysed, and little influence was observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Athreya · Philos. Mag. · 2006 · 86 · 373910.1080/14786430500157060 ↗
2. Steinbach · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 496510.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.009 ↗
3. Boettinger · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
4. Wheeler · Phys. Rev. A · 1992 · 45 · 742410.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424 ↗
5. Kim · Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 58 · 331610.1103/PhysRevE.58.3316 ↗
6. Karma · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 361410.1103/PhysRevE.60.3614 ↗
7. Kim · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
8. Karma · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 ↗
9. Echebarria · Phys. Rev. E · 2004 · 70 · 06160410.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604 ↗
10. Ohno · Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 03160310.1103/PhysRevE.79.031603 ↗
11. Asta · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 94110.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.020 ↗
12. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 19910.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.028 ↗
13. Cha · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 329510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00184-7 ↗
14. Böttger · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2006 · 8 · 24110.1002/adem.200500241 ↗
15. Böttger · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 269710.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.008 ↗
16. Kim · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 439110.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.004 ↗
17. Böttger · Steel Res. Int. · 2008 · 79 · 60810.1002/srin.200806173 ↗
18. Fries · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2009 · 100 · 12810.3139/146.110013 ↗
19. Galenko · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 616610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.043 ↗
20. Folch · Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 72 · 01160210.1103/PhysRevE.72.011602 ↗
21. Eiken · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 73 · 06612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
22. Steinbach · Physica D · 2006 · 217 · 15310.1016/j.physd.2006.04.001 ↗
23. Steinbach · J. Phase Equilib. Diff. · 2007 · 28 · 10110.1007/s11669-006-9009-2 ↗
24. Steinbach · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
25. Ohno · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 574910.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.050 ↗
26. Warnken · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 586210.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.013 ↗
27. Broughton · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 49 · 149610.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1496 ↗
28. Mikheev · J. Cryst. Growth · 1991 · 112 · 59110.1016/0022-0248(91)90340-B ↗
29. Karma A · Phys. Rev. E · 1996 · 53 · R301710.1103/PhysRevE.53.R3017 ↗
30. Karma · J. Cryst. Growth · 1997 · 174 · 5410.1016/S0022-0248(96)01060-3 ↗
31. Karma · Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 57 · 432310.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
32. Gurevich · Phys. Rev. E · 2010 · 82 · 05160610.1103/PhysRevE.82.051606 ↗
33. Amoorezaei · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 611510.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.029 ↗
34. Fallah · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 163310.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.009 ↗
35. Jeong · Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 64 · 04160210.1103/PhysRevE.64.041602 ↗
36. Provatas · Int. J. Mod. Phys. B · 2005 · 19 · 452510.1142/S0217979205032917 ↗
37. Dantzig · 2009