journal article·2022-10

Magnetic field and strain effects in Janus-like Weyl semimetals MoTeSe with four Weyl points

Y.Z. Li, L.L. Zhao, X.M. Zhao, T.A. Dai, J.X. Zhong, L.J. Meng

Publisher page

Abstract

We suggest a new Janus-like Weyl semimetal (WSM) candidate MoTeSe with only four Weyl points (WPs) by alloying route from prototype Td-phase WSM MoTe2 with twelve WPs. The topological properties and topological responses under external uniform magnetic field B and strain of MoTeSe have been investigated by Wannier-function-based tight-binding Hamiltonian and first-principles method. Our calculations show WSM state is robust in a large B with the magnitude of order 10 meV and the separation distance of WPs can be effectively modulated by changing the direction and strength of B. The four WPs move away from the kz = 0 plane and the energy of WP changes parabolically with the increase of c-axial B. By contrast, the energy of WP varies linearly and approaches to the Fermi level with the increasing a-/b-axial B. We further consider the influence of in-plane B on the topological response of MoTeSe and reveal a more complex and diverse behavior. In addition, four-WP MoTeSe displays good robustness within the moderate strain and can be transit into other multi-node WSM or non-WSM under larger strain. Our findings provide an excellent few-node WSM platform for understanding the behavior of Weyl fermion under external magnetic or strain field and a potential candidate for applications of WSM in topological electronic devices.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Gao · Annual Review of Materials Research · 2019 · 49 · 15310.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010049 ↗
2. Bernevig · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · 2018 · 8710.7566/JPSJ.87.041001 ↗
3. Hasan · Reviews of Modern Physics · 2010 · 82 · 304510.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 ↗
4. Lv · Reviews of Modern Physics · 2021 · 9310.1103/RevModPhys.93.025002 ↗
5. Wan · Physical Review B · 2011 · 83
6. Xu · Phycical Review Letters · 2011 · 107
7. Wang · Phycical Review Letters · 2016 · 117
8. M.M. Piva, J.C. Souza, V. Brousseau-Couture, K.R. Pakuszewski, J.K. John, C. Adriano, M. Ĉot́e, P.G. Pagliuso, M. Nicklas, arXiv 2111.05742, (2021).
9. Weng · Phycical Review X · 2015 · 5
10. Huang · Nature Communications · 2015 · 6 · 1
11. A.A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, m. Troyer, X. Dai, B.A. bernevig, Nature, 527 (2015) 495-498.10.1038/nature15768 ↗
12. Sun · Physical Review B · 2015 · 92
13. Wang · Phycical Review Letters · 2016 · 117
14. Autès · Physical Review Letters · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.066402 ↗
15. Belopolski · Nature Communications · 2017 · 8 · 110.1038/s41467-017-00938-1 ↗
16. Tang · Nature · 2019 · 566 · 48610.1038/s41586-019-0937-5 ↗
17. Claussen · Physical Review B · 2020 · 10110.1103/PhysRevB.101.245117 ↗
18. Vergniory · Nature · 2019 · 566 · 48010.1038/s41586-019-0954-4 ↗
19. Wu · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · 2021 · 14810.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109739 ↗
20. Meng · Physical Review B · 2019 · 100
21. Meng · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 460210.1039/C9NR09123H ↗
22. Meng · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1835810.1039/C9NR04551A ↗
23. Li · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018 · 115 · 950310.1073/pnas.1801650115 ↗
24. Chang · Nature Communications · 2016 · 7 · 1
25. T. Liang, J. Lin, Q. Gibson, M. Liu, W. Wang, H. Xiong, Jonathan, A. Sobota, M. Hashimoto, P.S. Kirchmann, Z.-X. Shen, R.J. Cava, a.N.P. Ong, Nature Physics, 14 (2018) 451-455.10.1038/s41567-018-0078-z ↗
26. Li · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2021 · 34
27. Baidya · Physical Review B · 2020 · 10210.1103/PhysRevB.102.165115 ↗
28. Villanova · Physical Review B · 2018 · 9810.1103/PhysRevB.98.075123 ↗
29. Liu · Science · 2014 · 343 · 86410.1126/science.1245085 ↗
30. Yang · Nano letters · 2015 · 15 · 166010.1021/nl504276u ↗
31. Lu · Nature nanotechnology · 2017 · 12 · 74410.1038/nnano.2017.100 ↗
32. Ji · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2018 · 122 · 312310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11584 ↗
33. W. Shi, K. Fan, h. Wang, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20 (2018) 29423-29429.10.1039/C8CP03354D ↗
34. Ma · Physical Review B · 2018 · 98
35. Lin · ACS nano · 2018 · 12 · 8894
36. Tang · Nature · 2020 · 579 · 35310.1038/s41586-020-2085-3 ↗
37. Li · Nature · 2020 · 579 · 36810.1038/s41586-020-2098-y ↗
38. Regan · Nature · 2020 · 579 · 35910.1038/s41586-020-2092-4 ↗
39. Wang · Physical Review B · 2012 · 85
40. Choi · Physical Review B · 2020 · 101
41. Kresse · Physical review B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
42. Blöchl · Physical Review B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
43. Grimme · Computational Molecular Science · 2011 · 1 · 21110.1002/wcms.30 ↗
44. Mostofi · Computer Physics Communications · 2014 · 185 · 230910.1016/j.cpc.2014.05.003 ↗
45. J. Wosnitza, A.D. Bianchi, T. Herrmannsd¨orfer, RW¨unsch, S. Zherlitsyn, S. Zvyagin, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 51 (2006) 142.10.1088/1742-6596/51/1/142 ↗
46. Soluyanov · Physical Review B · 2011 · 83
47. Yu · Physical Review B · 2011 · 84
48. Sancho · Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics · 1985 · 15 · 85110.1088/0305-4608/15/4/009 ↗
49. Wu · Computer Physics Communications · 2018 · 224 · 40510.1016/j.cpc.2017.09.033 ↗