journal article·2015-11Open access

Model form uncertainty versus intrinsic atomic variability in amorphous silicon oxides and nitrides

Nathan L. Anderson, Ravi Pramod Vedula, Alejandro Strachan

Abstract

Abstract We quantify uncertainties in density functional theory predictions of several fundamental materials properties of amorphous dielectrics focusing on those that arise from the intrinsic atomic variability of the glass structures and those stemming from approximations in the theory. The intrinsic, or aleatoric, uncertainties are quantified by performing calculations over ensembles of structures obtained by annealing independent liquid samples. We estimate model form, or epistemic, uncertainties by comparing results from two exchange and correlation functionals that exhibit different bonding characteristics: the local density approximation (that typically overbinds), and the generalized gradient approximation (that often underbinds). In the case of density, bulk modulus, and point defect formation energies predictions obtained from systems containing between 72 and 192 atoms, typical of current state-of-the-art calculations, show that the intrinsic variability in the atomic structure leads to uncertainties a factor of two to four times greater than those originating from model form. While model form discrepancies remain important, our results emphasize the importance of using ensembles of structures to make predictions of amorphous materials. The use of such probabilistic atomic-level data as input in multiscale materials or device models is critical for predictions with quantified uncertainties but also to uncover how atomic variability affects device performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. National Science and Technology Council M G I, (retrieved 07.11.12).
2. Kouchmeshky · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 48 · 21310.1016/j.commatsci.2010.01.001 ↗
3. Strachan · Model. Simulat. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 21 · 06500910.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065009 ↗
4. Owhadi · SIAM Rev. · 2013 · 55 · 27110.1137/10080782X ↗
5. Morales Medina · Ct&F-Cien. Tecnol. Futuro · 2009 · 3
6. Anderson · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 17290810.1063/1.4707340 ↗
7. Hoffman · Risk Anal. · 1994 · 1410.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00281.x ↗
8. Mortensen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 9510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.216401 ↗
9. Mattsson · Model. Simulat. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2005 · 13 · R110.1088/0965-0393/13/1/R01 ↗
10. Effect of topological disorder on structural, mechanical, and electronic properties of amorphous silicon nitride: an atomistic study10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205209 ↗
11. White · Circ. Dev. Mag., IEEE · 2000 · 16 · 2210.1109/101.857747 ↗
12. Pacchioni · 2000 · vol. 2
13. M. Bohr, Moore’s Law in the innovation era, in: Conference on Design for Manufacturability through Design-Process Integration V, SPIE-Int Soc Optical Engineering, San Jose, CA, 2011.10.1117/12.883462 ↗
14. Schmidt · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2001 · 16 · 16410.1088/0268-1242/16/3/308 ↗
15. Palm · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 431 · 51410.1016/S0040-6090(03)00249-9 ↗
16. Papaioannou · IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor. Tech. · 2005 · 53 · 346710.1109/TMTT.2005.857336 ↗
17. Y. Xiaobin, J.C.M. Hwang, D. Forehand, C.L. Goldsmith, Modeling and characterization of dielectric-charging effects in RF MEMS capacitive switches, in: Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005 IEEE MTT-S International, 2005, p. 4.
18. Anderson · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 20640210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.206402 ↗
19. Vedula · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 205204
20. Kohn · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · 113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
21. Hybertsen · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 539010.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
22. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 33 · 882210.1103/PhysRevB.33.8822 ↗
23. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
24. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
25. Gunnarsson · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 427410.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274 ↗
26. Yanai · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 393 · 5110.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 ↗
27. Becke · Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 38 · 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
28. Becke · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 564810.1063/1.464913 ↗
29. Sham · Phys. Rev. · 1966 · 145 · 56110.1103/PhysRev.145.561 ↗
30. Vosko · Can. J. Phys. · 1980 · 58 · 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
31. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
32. Ceperley · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 45 · 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
33. Hammer · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 741310.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413 ↗
34. Van Ginhoven · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 02420810.1103/PhysRevB.71.024208 ↗
35. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
36. Karazhanov · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 05371710.1063/1.3213359 ↗
37. Giacomazzi · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 14420110.1103/PhysRevB.80.144201 ↗
38. . The DFT simulations in this paper can be repeated online using the “nanoMATERIALS: SeqQuest-DFT” tool available in nanoHUB.org .
39. Troullier · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
40. D.R. Hamann (unpublished).
41. Mrstik · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 657710.1063/1.370164 ↗
42. Haynes · 2011
43. Aiyama · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1979 · 33 · 13110.1016/0022-3093(79)90043-7 ↗
44. Misawa · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1979 · 34 · 31310.1016/0022-3093(79)90018-8 ↗
45. Searle · 1998
46. Landau · 1980
47. Khan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 166710.1063/1.1638886 ↗
48. Xiu · J. Comput. Phys. · 2003 · 187 · 13710.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-5 ↗