journal article·2015-10Open access

Micromechanical modelling of bending under tension forming behaviour of dual phase steel 600

X. Wei, S.A. Asgari, J.T. Wang, B.F. Rolfe, H.C. Zhu, P.D. Hodgson

Abstract

Abstract A micromechanical modelling based approach by means of a Representative Volume Element (RVE) was employed to predict the flow behaviour and plastic strain of DP600 steel, produced by WISCO. Macroscopic modelling of a classical Bending-Under-Tension (BUT) experiment was employed to acquire strain deformation, and thus the following microscopic modelling was implemented by considering the realistic microstructure morphology. Comparisons between macroscopic behaviour and microscopic behaviour, including strain distribution and stress distribution, were extracted for different boundary conditions of the BUT set-up. The micro–macro modelling approach increases the understanding of the steel microstructure, which will enable this microstructure to be tailored for different applications in automobile industry in the future.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Sodjit · Mater. Des. · 2012 · 41 · 37010.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.010 ↗
2. Uthaisangsuk · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 45 · 61710.1016/j.commatsci.2008.06.024 ↗
3. Uthaisangsuk · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2008 · 43 · 2710.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.035 ↗
4. Paul · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 63 · 6610.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.061 ↗
5. Wang · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2005 · 42 · 128710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.017 ↗
6. R.H. Wagoner, A. Li, Advances in springback, in: Numisheet 2005: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Pts A and B, vol. 778, 2005, pp. 209–214.10.1063/1.2011219 ↗
7. Wang · Int. J. Plast · 2004 · 20 · 220910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.008 ↗
8. Li · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2002 · 44 · 10310.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-2 ↗
9. Kouznetsova · Mech. Mater. · 2008 · 40 · 64110.1016/j.mechmat.2008.02.004 ↗
10. Asgari · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 45 · 86010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.12.003 ↗
11. Asgari · 2008
12. Sreeranganathan · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 49 · 40710.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.029 ↗
13. R. Rodriguez, I. Gutierrez, Unified formulation to predict the tensile curves of steels with different microstructures, in: Thermec’2003, Pts 1–5, vol. 426-4, 2003, pp. 4525–4530.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.4525 ↗
14. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. a-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. · 2007 · 452 · 63310.1016/j.msea.2006.11.147 ↗
15. Kadkhodapour · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 94 · 10610.1016/j.commatsci.2014.02.046 ↗
16. (USA), N.I.o.S.a.T. Object-Oriented Finite Element Program. 2007; version 2.4: .
17. van der Sluis · Mech. Mater. · 2000 · 32 · 44910.1016/S0167-6636(00)00019-3 ↗
18. Smit · Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. · 1998 · 155 · 18110.1016/S0045-7825(97)00139-4 ↗
19. van der Sluis · Mech. Mater. · 2001 · 33 · 49910.1016/S0167-6636(01)00066-7 ↗
20. Kouznetsova · Comput. Mech. · 2001 · 27 · 3710.1007/s004660000212 ↗
21. Kouznetsova · Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. · 2002 · 54 · 123510.1002/nme.541 ↗