journal article·2014-11

Mechanical behavior prediction of TWIP steel in plastic deformation

W.J. Dan, F. Liu, W.G. Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to predict the influence of twinning volume fraction and grain size on the mechanical behavior of TWIP steel in plastic deformation with a dislocation-based model considering austenite twinning. The preceding model was implemented into FEM codes based on the conventional elastoplasticity increment theory, and verified by the experimental data of Allain et al. (2002). Then the influence of twinning volume fraction and grain size on the work-hardening of TWIP steel in tensile deformation was investigated. A damage factor was proposed to evaluate the failure trend in plastic deformation based on the Freudenthal fracture criterion, and the effect of twinning volume fraction and grain size on the proposed factor was analyzed. The results indicate that higher twinning volume fraction improves strength and ductility, delays the failure of TWIP steel. However, finer grain improves strength and ductility, but may deteriorate fracture resistance of TWIP steel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Grassel · J. Phys. IV France · 1997 · 5 · 383
2. Allain · Steel Res. · 2002 · 73 · 29910.1002/srin.200200212 ↗
3. Bracke · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 151210.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.036 ↗
4. Jin · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 527 · 15710.1016/j.msea.2009.08.028 ↗
5. Vercammen · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 200510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.040 ↗
6. Dai · J. Iron Steel Res. Int. · 2010 · 17 · 5310.1016/S1006-706X(10)60142-2 ↗
7. Dini · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 275910.1016/j.msea.2010.01.033 ↗
8. Lebedkina · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 519 · 14710.1016/j.msea.2009.04.067 ↗
9. Barbier · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 500 · 19610.1016/j.msea.2008.09.031 ↗
10. Ahn · Metals Mater. Int. · 2009 · 15 · 63710.1007/s12540-009-0637-z ↗
11. Chung · Int. J. Plasticity · 2011 · 27 · 5210.1016/j.ijplas.2010.03.006 ↗
12. Bouaziz · Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 58 · 48410.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.050 ↗
13. Shiekhelsouk · Int. J. Plasticity · 2009 · 25 · 10510.1016/j.ijplas.2007.11.004 ↗
14. Karaman · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 203110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00051-3 ↗
15. Franciosi · Acta Mater. · 1985 · 33 · 160110.1016/0001-6160(85)90154-3 ↗
16. Olson · Metal Trans. · 1974 · 6A · 791
17. Allain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 387–389 · 27210.1016/j.msea.2004.05.038 ↗
18. Bouaziz · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 319–321 · 24610.1016/S0921-5093(00)02019-0 ↗
19. Hill · 1950
20. Dini · Mater Des. · 2010 · 31 · 339510.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.049 ↗
21. Dini · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 26 · 18110.1016/S1005-0302(10)60030-8 ↗
22. Lee · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 75 · 16910.1016/j.matlet.2012.02.012 ↗
23. Koyama · Mater. Des. · 2013 · 49 · 23410.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.061 ↗
24. Hamadaa · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 517 · 6810.1016/j.msea.2009.03.039 ↗
25. Gutierrez-Urrutia · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 355210.1016/j.msea.2010.02.041 ↗
26. Dorn · Trans. Am. Soc. Metal. · 1947 · 39 · 741
27. Swift · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 1967 · 9 · 110.1016/0020-7403(67)90075-6 ↗
28. Hill · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1952 · 1 · 1910.1016/0022-5096(52)90003-3 ↗
29. Marciniak · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 1967 · 9 · 60910.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
30. Keeler · ASM Trans. Quart. · 1964 · 56 · 25
31. Hartley · 1992
32. Clift · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 1990 · 32 · 110.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C ↗