Spring-in of curved CFRP/foam-core sandwich structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper reports on a comprehensive study on process-induced distortions (PID) of curved CFRP/foam-core sandwich panels. The study’s aim is to validate the prediction quality of two existing analytical models and a novel straightforward simulation technique, which utilizes measured spring-in distortions of representative monolithic samples as input. Sandwich specimens with a radius of approximately 350 mm are manufactured with three different core thicknesses and two different core run-out geometries. The manufactured parts show a significant radius reduction which declines for increasing core thickness which is satisfactorily predicted by both, the analytical models and the simulation. The effect of the run-out shape turned out to be of inferior relevance for the investigated specimen configurations. However, it is found to be essential to use plane-stress assumptions and to capture the stiffness ratio between the skins and the core. Therefore, an extension of the Fernlund model is proposed whose predictions match excellently with the measured distortion of the specimens. Given the simplicity of the simulation approach in combination with the limited number of inputs makes it a tool of great value, particularly early on in the design cycle.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Spring-In and warpage of angled composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00105-7 ↗
2. Manufacturing distortions of a CFRP box-structure – a semi-numerical prediction approach10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.003 ↗
3. E. Kappel, Process distortions in composite manufacturing – from an experimental characterization to a prediction approach for the global scale (Ph.D. thesis), Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 2013.
4. In situ measurements of through-the-thickness strains during processing of AS4/8552 composite10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.018 ↗
5. A.A. Johnston, An integrated model of the development of process-induced deformation in autoclave processing of composite structures (Ph.D. thesis), University of British Columbia, 1997.
6. D.W. Radford, Shape stability in composites (Ph.D. thesis), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,1987.
7. Predicting process-induced distortions in composite manufacturing – a pheno-numerical simulation strategy10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.069 ↗
8. G. Fernlund, A. Floyd, M. Shewfelt, M. Hudek, Process analysis and tool compensation for a complex composite panel, in: American Society for Composites 22nd Annual Technical Conference, Seattle, 2007.
9. R.H. Nelson, D.S. Cairns, Prediction of dimensional changes in composite laminates during cure, in: 34th international SAMPE Symposium, vol. 34, 1989, pp. 2397–2410.
10. Warping in advanced composite tools with varying angles and radii10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00045-6 ↗
11. Spring-in of angled sandwich panels
12. Evonik, Rohacell® XT – product information, 2011.
13. Hexcel composites, Redux® 319 product data, 2010.
14. Tool-part interaction in composites processing. Part I: Experimental investigation and analytical model10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00131-3 ↗
15. Experimental identification of process parameters inducing warpage of autoclave-processed CFRP parts10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.013 ↗
16. Heat of reaction, degree of cure, and viscosity of Hercules 3501-6 resin10.1177/002199838201600605 ↗
17. Process modeling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure. Part I: Model formulation10.1177/002199839202601604 ↗
18. Dimensional accuracy of thermoset composites: simulation of process-induced residual stress10.1177/002199801772662000 ↗
19. J.M. Svanberg, Prediction of manufacturing induced shape distortions – high performance thermoset composites (Ph.D. thesis), Lulea˚ Universtiy of Technology, 2002.
20. Computationally efficient pseudo-viscoelastic models for evaluation of residual stresses in thermoset polymer composites during cure10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.009 ↗
21. Eric Jones, Travis Oliphant, Pearu Peterson, et al., SciPy: open source scientific tools for python, 2001, .
22. Shear-lag analysis of the effect of thickness on spring-in of curved composites10.1177/0021998306068072 ↗