Stereolithography 3D Printing of Microcapsule Catalyst-Based Self-Healing Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymer-based components manufactured by stereolithography-based (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing tend to show relatively poor mechanical strength compared to polymer-based components fabricated by conventional methods such as compression molding. Some of this difference is related to the thermoset nature of typical SLA 3D-printed materials, where high cross-linking density and brittle material behavior can result in catastrophic material failure, limiting the life span of SLA 3D-printed composite materials. Previous studies have investigated potential techniques for improving the mechanical strength of SLA 3D-printed polymer components, such as the addition of various strengthening fillers; however, a few studies have investigated the incorporation of self-healing materials for SLA 3D printing to extend material lifetimes. In this study, we investigate the use of a microcapsule catalyst self-healing system in conjunction with commercially available photocurable resin toward increasing SLA 3D-printed specimen lifetime and material sustainability. Microcapsules filled with healing fluids are synthesized using in situ interfacial polymerization and dispersed in commercial resin prior to SLA 3D printing of self-healing composite specimens. The ability of these microcapsules to survive the SLA 3D printing process intact is demonstrated, and X-ray nano-computed tomography (X-ray Nano-CT) imaging shows microcapsules to be distributed throughout printed specimens. The self-healing behavior of these SLA 3D-printed composite materials is evaluated via quantification of mechanical properties, and healing efficiency. Overall, this is a facile and promising approach for the incorporation of self-healing behavior into SLA 3D printing resins.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer composites and self-healing · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States
Funding
National Science Foundation · Auburn University
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0033010.1021/acs.macromol.9b00330 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20170124010.1002/adma.201701240 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.7b0781610.1021/acsami.7b07816 ↗
5. 10.1039/C7MH00043J10.1039/C7MH00043J ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.029 ↗
7. Gebhardt, A.; Hotter, J. Additive Manufacturing. 2016, pp 97–107.10.3139/9781569905838.fm ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1212197010.3390/ma12121970 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101384401549310.1023/A:1013844015493 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.76013010510.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.1981.07026031410.1002/app.1981.070260314 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat193410.1038/nmat1934 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0047210.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00472 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.05710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.057 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10453210.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104532 ↗
17. 10.1039/C9TB00831D10.1039/C9TB00831D ↗
18. Hayes, S.; Swait, T.; Lafferty, A. Recent Advances in Smart Self-healing Polymers and Composites; Elsevier, 2015; pp 162–165.
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.01510.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.015 ↗
20. 10.1002/adhm.20140008410.1002/adhm.201400084 ↗
21. 10.1038/3505723210.1038/35057232 ↗
22. 10.1021/am100084k10.1021/am100084k ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.07.02810.1016/j.polymer.2015.07.028 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-018-36828-910.1038/s41598-018-36828-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.07210.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.072 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.b.3299410.1002/jbm.b.32994 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.07.02810.1016/j.polymer.2015.07.028 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.02.02010.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.02.020 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.03310.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.033 ↗
30. 10.1039/c3py00081h10.1039/c3py00081h ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20100079810.1002/adfm.201000798 ↗
32. 10.1002/adem.20180087610.1002/adem.201800876 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b0183010.1021/acsami.7b01830 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0124310.1021/acs.biomac.7b01243 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1207153410.3390/polym12071534 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41427-019-0109-y10.1038/s41427-019-0109-y ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.7b0744510.1021/acsami.7b07445 ↗
39. 10.1039/C7ME00023E10.1039/C7ME00023E ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20150123410.1002/adma.201501234 ↗
41. 10.18063/ijb.v4i1.12610.18063/ijb.v4i1.126 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11340-013-9787-510.1007/s11340-013-9787-5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.05.02210.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.05.022 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.52610.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.526 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.02110.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.021 ↗
47. Crespy, D.; Landfester, K.; Fickert, J.; Rohwerder, M. Advances in Polymer Science Series 2016, Vol. 273, pp 247–283.
48. 10.1007/s10853-020-04925-810.1007/s10853-020-04925-8 ↗
49. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016173.73733.dc10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016173.73733.dc ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.032 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.09410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.094 ↗
52. 10.1590/S1678-7757200500030000810.1590/S1678-77572005000300008 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.32852610.1063/1.328526 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0025544510.1007/BF00255445 ↗