journal article·2024-04

Dynamic crushing performance of foam-filled periodic hybrid cellular structures

Ting Liu, Changhai Chen, Yuansheng Cheng

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Sequential metamaterials with alternating Poisson’s ratios10.1038/s41467-022-28696-9 ↗
2. A new blast absorbing sandwich panel with unconnected corrugated layers—Numerical study10.3390/en14010214 ↗
3. Blast resistance of metallic double arrowhead honeycomb sandwich panels with different core configurations under the paper tube-guided air blast loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106457 ↗
4. Crashworthiness analysis and multi-objective optimization of spatial lattice structure under dynamic compression10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104713 ↗
5. Dynamic crushing of 2D cellular structures: A finite element study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.05.007 ↗
6. Dynamic crushing behavior of honeycomb structures with irregular cell shapes and non-uniform cell wall thickness10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.017 ↗
7. The mechanical behaviour of aluminium foam structures in different loading conditions10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.007 ↗
8. Quasi-static and impact behaviour of foam-filled graded auxetic panel10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104606 ↗
9. Shah U, Kapania RK. Crush dynamics and shear failure of alternate sandwich panel honeycomb core for space structures 2019.10.2514/6.2019-0205 ↗
10. Dynamic mechanical behavior of additively manufactured bio-inspired metallic lattice structure subjected to high strain rate impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104752 ↗
11. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00056-8 ↗
12. Design-oriented crushing analysis of hexagonal honeycomb core under in-plane compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.066 ↗
13. Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008 ↗
14. Impact resistance and energy absorption of regular and functionally graded hexagonal honeycombs with cell wall material strain hardening10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.10.012 ↗
15. Hierarchical honeycombs with tailorable properties10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.029 ↗
16. The development of a new shock absorbing uniaxial graded auxetic damper (UGAD)10.3390/ma12162573 ↗
17. Dynamic crushing analysis of a three-dimensional re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.3390/ma12030460 ↗
18. In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.086 ↗
19. In-plane dynamics crushing of a reinforced honeycomb with enhanced energy absorption10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104807 ↗
20. Crushing behaviors of novel Diabolo shaped honeycombs with enhanced energy absorption performance10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107492 ↗
21. In-plane energy absorption characteristics and mechanical properties of 3D printed novel hybrid cellular structures10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.064 ↗
22. In-plane compression behavior of hybrid honeycomb metastructures: Theoretical and experimental studies10.1016/j.ast.2020.106081 ↗
23. Liangmo Wang, Wang L, Tang
24. Energy absorption characteristics of a lightweight auxetic honeycomb under low-velocity impact loading10.1016/j.tws.2023.110577 ↗
25. Characterization and physical properties of aluminium foam–polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite hybrid structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111521 ↗
26. Hybrid Structures Made of Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite Foams Embedded within Aluminum Open-Cell Foam10.3390/met10060768 ↗
27. Multifunctional hybrid structures made of open-cell aluminum foam impregnated with cellulose/graphene nanocomposites10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116197 ↗
28. Dynamic penetration of cellular solids: Experimental investigation using Hopkinson bar and computed tomography10.1016/j.msea.2020.140096 ↗
29. High-velocity impact resistance of doubly curved sandwich panels with re-entrant honeycomb and foam core10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104230 ↗
30. Study on the low-velocity impact response of foam-filled multi-cavity composite panels10.1016/j.tws.2022.108953 ↗
31. Low-velocity impact resistance of all composite cylindrical shell panels with a foam filled honeycomb core: Theoretical and experimental investigation10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104765 ↗
32. Dynamic impact response of aluminum honeycombs filled with Expanded Polypropylene foam10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.043 ↗
33. Experimental and numerical study of in-plane uniaxial compression response of PU foam filled aluminum arrowhead auxetic honeycomb10.1108/RPJ-08-2023-0267 ↗
34. Dynamic crushing performance of bio-inspired sandwich structures with beetle forewing cores10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104456 ↗
35. Mechanical characteristics and foam filling enhancement mechanism of polymeric periodic hybrid structures under uniaxial compression10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111762 ↗
36. ASTM. Test methods for tension testing of metallic materials (E8/E8M−22) 2022.
37. Non-linear necking behaviour of S275 to S960 structural steels under monotonic tension10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114263 ↗
38. Effect of polyurea coating with different mechanical properties on blast resistance of aluminum alloy circular tube structures: Experiments vs numerical simulations10.1016/j.tws.2022.110361 ↗
39. The high strain rate response of PVC foams and end-grain balsa wood10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.005 ↗
40. Chen · 2011
41. Mechanical behaviors of the carbon fiber reinforced X-core sandwich structure under the dynamic compression
42. Fast prediction for dynamic response of cellular material under dynamic crushing
43. Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
44. Dynamic crushing characteristics of bio-inspired minimal surface primitive structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116438 ↗
45. Study on constitutive relationship of 6061 aluminum alloy based on Johnson-Cook model
46. Dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with density gradient10.1177/1099636213509099 ↗
47. Hu Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, Ding S, Wang R, Xia R. Design methodology for functional gradient star-shaped honeycomb with enhanced impact resistance and energy absorption. Mater Today Commun 2024:108020.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.108020 ↗
48. Energy absorption characteristics and negative Poisson’s ratio effect of axisymmetric tetrachiral honeycombs under in-plane impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117493 ↗
49. In-plane crushing behavior and energy absorption of a novel graded honeycomb from hierarchical architecture10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107202 ↗
50. In-plane dynamics crushing of a combined auxetic honeycomb with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced energy absorption10.1016/j.tws.2020.107366 ↗
51. In–plane dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with a novel type of multi-cells10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.028 ↗
52. Self-similar hierarchical honeycombs in two different fractal layouts: A comparative study of the in-plane crushing behaviors10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104900 ↗
53. Dynamic impact testing of cellular solids and lattice structures: Application of two-sided direct impact Hopkinson bar10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103767 ↗